BanksJeffrey S.KiewietD. Roderick. 1989. Explaining patterns of candidate competition in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science33, no. 4:997–1015.
2.
BondJon R.CovingtonGary R.FleisherRichard. 1985. Explaining challenger quality in congressional elections. The Journal of Politics47, no. 2:510–29.
3.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.1996. A dynamic analysis of the role of war chests in campaign strategy. American Journal of Political Science40, no. 2:352–71.
4.
CanonDavid T.1993. Sacrificial lambs or strategic politicians? Political amateurs in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science37, no. 4:1119–41.
5.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.. 1998. The effects of term limits on state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly23, no. 2:271–300.
6.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.. 2000. Term limits in the state legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
CassieWilliam E.BreauxDavid A.. 1998. Expenditures and election results. In Campaign finance in state legislative elections. edited byThompsonJoel A.MoncriefGary F.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
8.
ChubbJohn E.1988. Institutions, the economy, and the dynamics of state elections. American Political Science Review82, no. 1:133–54.
9.
DanielKermitLottJohn R.. 1997. Term limits and electoral competitiveness: Evidence from California's state legislative races. Public Choice90 no. 1–2:165–84.
10.
FrancisWayne L.KennyLawrence W.. 1997. Equilibrium projections of the consequences of term limits upon expected tenure, institutional turnover, and membership experience. Journal of Politics59, no. 1:240–52.
11.
FranklinDanielWestinTor. 1998. Predicting the institutional effects of term limits. Public Choice96, no. 3–4:381–93.
12.
GilmourJohn B.RothsteinPaul. 1994. Term limitation in a dynamic model of partisan balance. American Journal of Political Science38, no. 3:770–96.
13.
GoldenburgE.TraugottMichaelBaumgartnerFrank R.. 1986. Preemptive and reactive spending in U.S. House races. Political Behavior8, no. 1:3–20.
14.
GreenDonald P.KrasnoJonathan S.. 1988. Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House elections. American Journal of Political Science32, no. 4:884–907.
15.
GreeneJay P.1995. Term limits: A measure of our ignorance. Social Science Quarterly76, no. 4:717–19.
16.
HerrickRebekahMooreMichael K.HibbingJohn R.. 1994. Unfastening the electoral connection: The behavior of U.S. representatives when reelection is no longer a factor. The Journal of Politics56, no. 1:214–227.
HoganRobert E.2001. Campaign war chests and challenger emergence in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 54, no. 4:815–830.
19.
JacobsonGary C.1989. Strategic politicians and the dynamics of U.S. House elections, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review83, no. 3:773–93.
20.
JacobsonGary C.1995. The House under term limits: A comment. Social Science Quarterly76, no. 4:720–24.
21.
JacobsonGary C.1997. The politics of congressional elections. 4th ed.New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
22.
JacobsonGary C.KernellSamuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in congressional elections. 2nd ed.New Haven: Yale University Press.
23.
JewellMalcolm E.1994. State legislative elections: What we know and don't know. American Politics Quarterly, 22, no. 4:483–509.
24.
JewellMalcolm E.MorehouseSarah M.. 2001. Political parties and elections in the American states. 4th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
25.
JohannesJohn R.McAdamsJohn C.1981. The congressional incumbency effect: Is it casework, policy compatibility, or something else?American Journal of Political Science25, no. 3:512–42.
26.
KrasnoJonathon S.GreenDonald P.. 1988. Pre-empting quality challengers in House elections. Journal of Politics50, no. 4:920–36.
27.
MaiselL. Sandy. 1999. Parties and elections in America: The electoral process. 3rd ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
28.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29.
MillsEugene. 1996. Term limits and the prisoner's dilemma. Public Affairs Quarterly10, no. 2:143–152.
30.
MondakJeffrey J.1995. Elections as filters: Term limits and the composition of the U.S. House. Political Research Quarterly48, no. 4:701–27.
31.
OpheimCynthia. 1994. The effect of U.S. state legislative term limits revisited. Legislative Studies Quarterly19, no. 1:49–59.
32.
OppenheimerBruce I.1995. House term limits: A distorted picture. Social Science Quarterly76, no. 4:725–29.
33.
PowellRichard J.2000. The impact of term limits on the candidacy decisions of state legislatures in U.S. House elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly25, no. 4:645–61.
34.
RauschJohn D.1993. Testing legislative term limits: The San Mateo Board of County Supervisors as laboratory. National Civic Review82, no. 2:149–156.
35.
ReedWilliam R.SchansbergD. Eric. 1995. The House under term limits: What would it look like?Social Science Quarterly76, no. 4:699–716.
36.
RosenthalAlan. 1998. The decline of representative democracy: Process, participation, and power in state legislatures. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
37.
SchlesingerJoseph A.1966. Ambition and politics: Political careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
38.
SchragPeter. 1998. Paradise lost: California's experience and America's future. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
UpshawE.1995. An economist's view of research on term limits. Social Science Quarterly76, no. 4:734–40.
40.
EmilyVan Dunk. 1997. Challenger quality in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly50, no. 4:793–808.
41.
WrightonJ. MarkSquirePerverill. 1997. Uncontested seats and electoral competition for the U.S. House of Representatives over time. Journal of Politics, 59, no. 2:452–68.