BonneauChrisHallMelinda Gann. 2003. Predicting challengers in state supreme court elections: Context and the politics of institutional design. Political Research Quarterly56: 337–49.
4.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 1995. Studying courts comparatively: The view from the American states. Political Research Quarterly48: 5–29.
5.
BracePaulLangerLaura. 2002. The preemptive power of sate supreme courts: Enactment of abortion and death penalty laws in the American states. Working paper. Rice University.
6.
BrodyDavid. 2004. The relationship between judicial performance evaluations and judicial elections. Judicature87, no. 4:168–77.
7.
ClaytonCornellGillmanHoward. 1999. Supreme court decision-making: New institutionalist approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DuboisPhilip. 1986. Penny for your thoughts? Campaign spending in California trial court elections 1976–1982. Western Political Quarterly39: 265–84.
10.
EmmertCraig. 1989. Judicial review in state supreme courts, 1981–1985. PhD diss., Florida State University.
11.
EuleJulian. 1994. Crocodiles in the bathtub: State courts, voter initiatives and the threat of electoral reprisal. University of Colorado Law Review65: 733–41.
FreejohnJohn. 1995. Law, legislation, and positive political theory. In Modern political economy: Old topics, new directions, edited byBanksJ.HanushekE.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
HallMelinda Gann. 1987. Constituent influences in state supreme courts: Conceptual notes and a case study. Journal of Politics49: 1117–24.
16.
HallMelinda Gann. 1992. Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics54: 427–46.
17.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001. State supreme courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review95, no. 2:315–29.
18.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1988. Order in the courts. Western Political Quarterly73: 391–405.
19.
JarosDeanCanonBradley. 1971. Dissent on state supreme courts: The differential significance of characteristics of judges. Midwest Journal of Political Science15: 322–46.
20.
LandesWilliamPosnerRonald. 1975. The independent judiciary in an interest group perspective. Journal of Law and Economics18, no. 3:875–901.
21.
Law professor challenges the court. 2002. The Spokesman-Review (April 2): A1.
22.
LovrichNicholasSheldonCharles. 1984. Voters in judicial elections: An attentive public or an uninformed electorate. Judicial System Journal9: 923–39.
MertonRobert. 1954. 1990. The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. New York: The Free Press.
25.
MertonRobertFiskeMajorieKendallPatricia. 1990. The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. 2nd ed.New York: Free Press.
26.
MillerKen. 1999. The role of courts in the initiative process: A search for standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5.
27.
Money in Politics Research Project. 2002. Independent expenditures: Who's paying for them and why? Press release. Portland, OR. May 17.
28.
Montana Human Rights Network. 1999. Montanans for a Better Government sets political agenda. Press release. Helena, MT. April 2.
Politics, money erode US trust in judiciary. 2002. New York Times (August 12): A1.
32.
ReadJames. 1995. Our complicated system: James Madison on power and liberty. Political Theory23: 452–75.
33.
RichardsonRichardVinesKenneth. 1970. The politics of federal courts: Lower courts in the United States. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
34.
SiengerCathy. 1999. Has the high court gone too far? Queen City New Service (Jan 22): A3.
35.
UelmenGerald. 1972. Crocodiles in the bathtub: The independence of state supreme courts in an era of judicial politicalization. Notre Dame Law Review72: 1135–53.
36.
WarwickDonaldLiningerCharles1975. The sample survey: Theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
