BasehartHarryComerJohn. 1991. Partisan and incumbent effects in state legislativeredistricting. Legislative Studies Quarterly16, no. 1: 65–79.
2.
BehrensAngelaUggenChristopherManzaJeff. 2003. Ballot manipulation and the menace of negro domination: Racial threat and felon disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850–2002. American Journal of Sociology109, no. 3: 559–605.
3.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science42, no. 1: 327–48.
4.
BoixCarles. 1999. Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral system in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review93, no. 3: 609–24.
5.
BracePaulSims-ButlerKellieArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartin. 2002. Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science46, no. 1: 173–89.
6.
Brown-DeanKhalilah L.2003. Culture, context, and competition: Explaining state-level variation in felon disenfranchisement laws. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 3–6, Chicago.
7.
ChandlerKim. Felon voting bill ensnares Riley: Governor would defy GOP if he signed it. Birmingham News (June 22, 2003).
8.
CoxGary W.KatzJonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DavidsonChandlerGrofmanBernard, eds. 1994. Quiet revolution in the South: The impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965–1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.
DawsonMichael C.1994. Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
DemeoMarisa J.OchoaSteven A.. 2003. Diminished voting power in the Latino community: The impact of felony disenfranchisement laws in ten targeted states. Los Angeles: Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
12.
DeSipioLouis. 1996. Counting on the Latino vote: Latinos as a new electorate. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
13.
ElazarDaniel. 1984. American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Harper and Row.
14.
EriksonRobert S.1976. The relationship between public and state policy: A new look at some forgotten data. American Journal of Political Science20, no. 1: 25–36.
15.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EwaldAlec C.2002. “Civil death”: The ideological paradox of criminal disenfranchisement law in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review5: 1045–137.
17.
FellnerJamieMauerMarc. 1998. Losing the vote: The impact of felony disenfranchisement laws in the United States. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch and the Sentencing Project.
18.
FennoRichard F.Jr.1978. Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Harper Collins.
19.
GilesMichael W.BucknerMelanie A.. 1993. David Duke and black threat: An old hypothesis revisited. Journal of Politics55, no. 3: 702–13.
20.
HarveyAlice E.1994. Ex-felon disenfranchisement and its influence on the black vote: A need for a second look. University of Pennsylvania Law Review142, no. 3: 1145–89.
21.
HenchVirginia. 1998. The death of voting rights: The legal disenfranchisement of minority voters. Case Western Reserve Law Review48, no. 4: 727–98.
22.
HerzikEric B.1985. The legal-formal structuring of state politics: A cultural explanation. Western Political Quarterly38, no. 3: 413–23.
23.
HillKim QuaileHinton-Anderson.Angela1995. Pathways of representation: A causal analysis of public opinion-policy linkages. American Journal of Political Science39, no. 4: 924–35.
24.
HoekstraValerieJohnsonTimothy. 2003. Delaying justice: The Supreme Court's decision to hear rearguments. Political Research Quarterly56, no. 3: 351–60.
25.
JamesScott C.LawsonBrian L.. 1999. The political economy of voting rights enforcement in America's gilded age. American Political Science Review93, no. 1: 115–31.
26.
JohnsonTimothy. 2003. The Supreme Court, the solicitor general, and the separation of powers. American Politics Research31, no. 4: 426–51.
27.
KeyV. O.Jr.1949. Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Vintage Books.
28.
KeyssarAlexander. 2000. The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.
29.
KingGaryZengLangche. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9, no. 2: 137–63.
30.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.SquirePeverill. 1995. The politics of institutional choice: Presidential ballot access for third parties in the United States. British Journal of Political Science25, no. 3: 419–27.
31.
ManzaJeffUggenChristopher. 2004. Punishment and democracy: Disenfranchisement of nonincarcerated felons in the United States. Perspectives on Politics2, no. 3: 491–505.
32.
ManzaJeffUggenChristopher. n.d. Locked out: Felon disenfranchisement and American democracy. New York: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.
33.
ManzaJeffBrooksClemUggenChristopher. 2004. Public attitudes toward felon disenfranchisement in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly68, no. 2: 275–86.
34.
McDonaghEileen L.PriceH. Douglas. 1985. Woman suffrage in the Progressive era: Patterns of opposition and support in referenda voting, 1910–1918. American Political Science Review79, no. 2: 415–35.
35.
McLeodAmanWhiteIsmail K.GavinAmelia R.. 2003. The locked ballot box: The impact of state criminal disenfranchisement laws on African American voting behavior and implications for reform. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law11, no. 1: 66–88.
36.
MilesThomas J.2004. Felon disenfranchisement and voter turnout. Journal of Legal Studies33, no. 1: 85–129.
37.
NiceDavid C.1992. The states and the death penalty. Western Political Quarterly45, no. 4: 1037–48.
38.
Office of the Pardon Attorney. 1996. Civil disabilities of convicted felons: A state-by-state survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
PalmerBarbaraSimonDennis. 2003. Political ambition and women in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1916–2000. Political Research Quarterly56, no. 2: 127–38.
40.
PinaireBrianHeumannMiltonBilottaLaura. 2003. Barred from the vote: Public attitudes toward the disenfranchisement of felons. Fordham Urban Law Journal30 (July): 1519–50.
41.
PreuhsRobert R.2001. State felon disenfranchisement policy. Social Science Quarterly82, no. 4: 733–48.
42.
ReiterDanStamAllan C.. 2003. Identifying the culprit: Democracy, dictatorship, and dispute initiation. American Political Science Review97, no. 2: 333–37.
43.
RingquistEvan J.HillKim QuaileLeighleyJan E.Hinton-Anderson.Angela1997. Lower-class mobilization and policy linkage in the U.S. states: A correction. American Journal of Political Science41, no. 1: 339–44.
44.
ShapiroAndrew L.1993. Challenging criminal disenfranchisement under the Voting Rights Act: A new strategy. Yale Law Journal103, no. 2: 537–66.
45.
TateKatherine. 1993. From protest to politics: The new black voters in American elections. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46.
TomzMichaelKingGaryZengLangche. 1999. RELOGIT: Rare events logistic regression, version 1.1. October 1. Cambridge: Harvard University.
47.
UggenChristopherManzaJeff. 2002. Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review67, no. 6: 777–803.
48.
WrightGerald C.SchaffnerBrian F.. 2002. The influence of party: Evidence from the state legislatures. American Political Science Review96, no. 2: 367–79.