AleschDaniel J.PetakWilliam J.. 1986. The politics and economics of earthquake hazard mitigation. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado.
2.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BerkePhilip R.BeatleyTimothy. 1992. Planning for earthquakes: Risk, politics, and policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
BirklandThomas A.1996. Natural disasters as focusing events: Policy communities and political response. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters14, no. 2: 221–43.
5.
BirklandThomas A.1997. After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
6.
BirklandThomas A.1998. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy18, no. 3: 53–74.
7.
BurbyRaymond J.MayPeter J.. 1998. Making building codes an effective tool for earthquake hazard mitigation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, November 5–8, Pasadena, CA.
8.
BurbyRaymond J.MayPeter J.PattersonRobert C.. 1998. Improving compliance with regulations: Choices and outcomes for local government. Journal of the American Planning Association64, no. 3: 324–34.
9.
ComerioMary C.1998. Disaster hits home: New policy for urban housing renewal. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
KingdonJohn W.1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd ed.Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
11.
MayPeter J.1991a. Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics. Journal of Public Policy11: 187–206.
12.
MayPeter J.1991b. Addressing public risks: Federal earthquake policy design. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management10: 263–85.
13.
MayPeter J.BirklandThomas A.. 1994. Earthquake risk reduction: An examination of local regulatory efforts. Environmental Management18: 923–37.
14.
MayPeter J.FeeleyT. Jens. 2000. Regulatory backwaters: Earthquake risk reduction in the western United States. State and Local Government Review32, no. 1: 20–33.
15.
MushkatelAlvin H.NiggJoanne. 1987. Effect of objective risk on key actors' support for seismic mitigation policy. Environmental Management11: 77–87.
16.
OsborneDavidGaeblerTed. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
RossiPeter H.WrightJames D.Weber-Burdin.Eleanor1982. Natural hazards and public choice: The state and local politics of hazard mitigation. New York: Academic Press.
18.
SabatierPaul A.1999. Theories of the policy process: Theoretical lenses on public policy. Boulder: Westview Press.
19.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaul. 1992. Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review86: 737–47.
20.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaulMintromMichael. 1995. Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
ShoafKimberley I.BourqueLinda B.. 1999. Correlates of damages to residences following the Northridge earthquake. Earthquake Spectra15 (February): 145–72.
22.
StallingsRobert A.1995. Promoting risk: Constructing the earthquake threat. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
23.
WilsonJames Q., ed. 1980. The politics of regulation. New York: Basic Books.
