BardachEugene. 2003. Policy analysis and public participation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22, no. 1: 115–33.
2.
BermanEvan M.1997. Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review57, no. 2 (March-April): 105–12.
3.
BernerMaureen. forthcoming. Current practices for involving citizens in local government budgeting: moving beyond method. Public Administration Quarterly.
4.
CallahanKathe. 2000. Citizen participation run amok. Public Performance and Management Review23, no. 3: 394–98.
5.
ChristopherGail. 1999. From the publisher: More than surface repair. The New Public Innovator5 (spring-summer): 5.
6.
ClarkT. N.1974. Can you cut a budget pie?Policy and Politics3, no. 2: 3–31.
7.
EbdonCarol. 2000. The relationship between citizen involvement in the budget process and city structure and culture. Public Productivity and Management Review23, no. 3 (March): 383–93.
8.
FishkinJames. 2003. Consulting the public through deliberative polling. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22, no. 1: 128–33.
9.
GlaserMarkDenhardtKathryn G.GrubbsJoseph W.. 1997. Local government sponsored community development: Exploring relationships between perceptions of empowerment and community impact. American Review of Public Administration27, no. 1: 76–94.
10.
GoodDavid A.2003. Promises and pitfalls: Experience in collaboration between the Canadian federal government and the voluntary sector. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22, no. 1: 122–27.
11.
KathleneLynMartinJohn A.. 1991. Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management10, no. 1: 46–63.
12.
KingCheryl SimiellFelteyKatherine M.SuselBridget O'Neill. 1998. The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review58, no. 4: 317–26.
13.
LeighningerMattMcCoyMartha. 1998. Mobilizing citizens: Study circles offer a new approach to citizenship. National Civic Review87, no. 2: 183–89.
14.
DomecqMonteRaulF.1998. Paraguay's public budget hearings: A path to citizen responsiveness. Government Finance Review14, no. 5 (October): 54–55.
15.
PleinChristopher L.GreenKenneth E.WilliamsDavid G.. 1998. Organic planning: A new approach to public participation in local governance. The Social Science Journal35, no. 4: 509–23.
16.
PreisserVic. 1997. Citizen-based budgeting: The Redding, California experiment. Public Management79, no. 5 (May): 18–22.
17.
RubinIrene. 1998. Class, tax and power: Municipal budgeting in the United States. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
18.
SiegelLenny. 2003. The success of a national dialogue on sustainable military range management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22, no. 1: 117–21.
19.
SimonsenBillJohnsonNancyBarnettRussell. 1996. Attempting non-incremental budget change in Oregon: An exercise in policy sharing. American Review of Public Administration26, no. 2 (June): 231–50.
SmithGerald E.HuntsmanCarole A.. 1997. Reframing the metaphor of the citizen-government relationship: A value-centered perspective. Public Administration Review57, no. 4: 309–18.
22.
SpiggleThomas. 2000. Unpublished memo. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute of Government.
23.
SpragueAmy. 2000. Municipal initiatives to increase popular participation in Brazil. LBJ Journal of Public Affairs12, no. 1 (spring): 33–41.
24.
SteinHerbert. 1989. Governing the $5 trillion economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
StephensG. Ross. 1974. State centralization and the erosion of local autonomy. The Journal of Politics36, no. 1: 44–76.
26.
TimneyMary M.1998. Overcoming administrative barriers to citizen participation: Citizen as partners, not adversaries. In Government is us, edited byKingCheryl SimerellStiversCamilla, 88–101. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
WaltersLawrenceAydelotteJamesMillerJessica. 2000. Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Administration Review60, no. 4 (July-August): 349–59.
28.
WatsonDouglas J.JusterRobertJohnsonGerald W.. 1991. Institutionalized use of citizen surveys in the budgetary and policy-making process: A small city case study. Public Administration Review51, no. 3: 232–40.
29.
WeeksEdward C.2000. The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials. Public Administration Review60, no. 4: 360–72.
30.
WirtFrederick M.1985. The dependent city? External influences upon local control. The Journal of Politics47, no. 1: 83–112.
31.
ZimmermanJoseph F.1981. Measuring local discretionary authority. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
