BartikTimothy J.EbertsRandall W.. 1999. Examining the effect of industry trends and structure on welfare caseloads. In Economic conditions and welfare reform, edited byDanzigerSheldon H., 119–58. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
2.
BellStephen. 2001. Why are welfare caseloads falling?Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
3.
BlankRebecca. 2001. What causes public assistance caseloads to grow?Journal of Human Resources36, no. 1: 85–119.
4.
BracePaul. 1993. State government and economic performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Council of Economic Advisers. 1997. Technical report: Explaining the decline in welfare receipt, 1993–1996. Washington, DC: Council of Economic Advisers.
6.
FiglioDavid N.ZiliakJames P.. 1999. Welfare reform, the business cycle, and the decline in AFDC caseloads. In Economic conditions and welfare reform, edited byDanzigerSheldon H., 17–48. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
7.
KarchAndrew. 2002. Carrots, sticks, and welfare reform: Are states racing to the bottom? Paper prepared for presentation at the 2nd Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy, May 24–26, Milwaukee.
8.
McCallumHeather. 1999. Welfare as we know it now … State approaches to TANF. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31–September 4, Atlanta.
9.
National Governors Association. Center for Best Practices. 1997. Summary of selected elements of state plans for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. November 20. www.nga.org.
10.
National Governors Association. Center for Best Practices. 1999. Round two summary of selected elements of state programs for temporary assistance. March 14. www.nga.org.
11.
ReichertDanaTweedieJack. 1999. Programs and services funded with TANF and MOE. National Conference of State Legislatures, Welfare Reform Project. www.ncsl.org/statefed/welfare/tanfuses.htm.
12.
TweedieJack. 2000. More than just welfare. State Legislatures26, (February): 30–33.
13.
WallaceGeoffreyBlankRebecca M.. 1999. What goes up must come down? Explaining recent changes in public assistance caseloads. In Economic conditions and welfare reform, edited byDanzigerSheldon H., 49–90. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
14.
ZedlewskiSheila R.1998. States' new TANF policies: Is the emphasis on carrots or sticks?Policy & Practice of Public Human Services56: 57–64.
15.
ZiliakJames P.FiglioDavid N.DavisElizabeth E.ConnollyLaura S.. 2000. Accounting for the decline in AFDC caseloads: Welfare reform or the economy?Journal of Human Resources35, no. 3: 570–86.