Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1995. Tax and expenditure limits on local governments. Information Report, M-194, Washington, DC: ACIR.
2.
BaumolWilliam J.1967. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review57, no. 3: 415–26.
3.
BerneRobertStiefelLeanna. 1993. Cutback budgeting: The long-term consequences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12 (fall): 664–84.
4.
BoydDonald. 2003. The current state fiscal crisis and its aftermath. Paper prepared for the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. September. Washington, DC: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
5.
BoydDonaldLankfordHampWyckoffJim. 2002. School district expenditures and fiscal stress. Report prepared for the Education Finance Research Consortium. July. Albany, New York.
6.
BradburyKatharine L.LaddHelen F.PerraultMarkReschovskyAndrewYingerJohn. 1984. State aid to offset fiscal disparities across communities. National Tax Journal 37 (June):151–70.
7.
BrunnerEric J.ImazekiJennifer. 2003. Private contributions and public school resources. December. Working Paper, Department of Economics, San Diego State University, San Diego.
8.
BrunnerEric J.SonstelieJon. 2003. School finance reform and voluntary fiscal federalism. Journal of Public Economics87 (September): 2157–85.
9.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2003. Compensation cost trends; employment cost index. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor. http://stats.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm. Accessed 2 October.
10.
Center for Public Policy Priorities. 2003. State budget shortfall for 2004–2005: How bad is it? Policy brief. Austin, TX: Center for Public Policy Priorities. http://www.cppp.org/products/policyanalysis/budgetfaq.html. Accessed 3 March.
11.
DuncombeWilliamYingerJohn. 2000. Financing higher student performance standards: the case of New York state. Economics of Education Review19: 363–86.
12.
EcklCorinaPérez.Arturo2003. State budget actions 2002; special fiscal report. April. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.
13.
FowlerWilliam J.Jr.MonkDavid H.. 2001. A primer for making cost adjustments in education. March. National Center for Education Statistics, Research and Development Report, NCES 2001–323. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, March.
14.
GamkharShama. 2002. Federal intergovernmental grants and the states: Managing devolution. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
15.
GoldSteven D.1995a. Spending policies and revenue trends compared. In The fiscal crisis of the state; lessons for the future, edited byGoldSteven D., 67–80. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16.
GoldSteven D.1995b. State fiscal problems and policies. In The fiscal crisis of the state: Lessons for the future, edited byGoldSteven D., 6–40. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
17.
GreenRichard K.ReschovskyAndrew. 1994. Fiscal assistance to municipal governments. In Dollars & sense, vol. III, edited byNicholsDonald A.. Madison: Robert M. La Follette Institute of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin.
18.
InmanRobert P.2003. Should Philadelphia's suburbs help their central city?Business Review. Second quarter. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
19.
JennyNicholas W.2003. Tax increases shore up state revenue. State Revenue Report no. 53 (September). Albany, NY: Fiscal Studies Program, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
20.
JohnsonNicholas. 2003. Despite major spending cuts and tax increases, states are likely to face large deficits for next year. 22 October. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. www.cbpp.org/10–22–03sfp.htm.
21.
JohnsonNicholasSchiessJenniferLlobreraJoseph. 2003. State revenues have fallen dramatically: Tax increases so far have failed to fill the gap. 22 October. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
22.
Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. 2003. The state of the nation's housing 2003. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
23.
LaddHelen F.1997. How school districts respond to fiscal constraint. In Selected papers in school finance 1996, edited by William F. Fowler Jr. NCES 98–217. June. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24.
LaddHelen F.YingerJohn. 1991. America's ailing cities: Fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
LevinsonArik. 1998. Balanced budgets and business cycles: Evidence from the states. National Tax Journal51 (December): 715–32.
26.
McNicholElizabeth C.SchiessJennifer. 2003. Fiscal crisis is shrinking state budgets. 22 October. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
27.
National Association of State Budget Officers. 2001. Fiscal survey of the states. November. Published with the National Governors Association. Washington, DC.
28.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2003a. Projections of education statistics. Table 4. Enrollment in grades K-12 in public elementary and secondary schools, by region and state, with enrollment projections: Fall 1995 to Fall 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2004013. Accessed 1 November.
29.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2003b. Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: School year 2000–01. Table 2: Percentage distribution of revenue for public elementary and secondary schools, by source and state: School year 2000–01. Statistics in Brief. NCES 2003–362. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003362.pdf. Accessed 5 October.
30.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2003a. State budget and tax actions, 2003. Preliminary report. Denver: Fiscal Affairs Program, NCSL. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/fiscal/presbta03.htm. Accessed 10 October.
31.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2003b. State budget update. February. Denver: Fiscal Affairs Program, NCSL.
32.
National Governors Association. 2002. State budget outlook remains bleak. Press release. 25 November. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
33.
ReschovskyAndrewImazekiJennifer. 2003. Let no child be left behind: Determining the cost of improved student performance. Public Finance Review31 (May): 263–90.
34.
ReschovskyAndrewSchwartzAmy Ellen. 1992. The impacts of grant-in-aid cutbacks on fiscal disparities among recipient governments. In Public finance with several levels of government, edited byPrud'hommeRémy, 235–48. The Hague: Foundation Journal Public Finance.
35.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. State and local government finances by level of government and by state: 1999–2000. http://www.census.gov/govs/www/estimate00.html. Accessed 10 February 2003.