AngelJacqueline L.2003. Devolution and the social welfare of elderly immigrants: Who will bear the burden?Public Administration Review63, no. 1: 79–89.
2.
BrammerDana B.1996. Term limits for state legislators. Public Administration Survey43, no. 3–4: 1–4.
3.
CiglerBeverly A.1998. Emerging trends in state-local relations. In Governing partners: State-local relations in the United States, edited by RussellHansonL., 53–74. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.
ClingermayerJames. 1995. Policy implications of leadership turnover. Policy currents: Newsletter of public policy section of the American Political Science Association (May): 1–5.
5.
ConlanTimothy. 1998. From New Federalism to devolution: Twenty-five years of inter-governmental reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6.
DillmanDon. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
DonahueJohn D.1999. The Devolution revolution: Hazardous crosscurrents confronting inequality in an era of devolution. New York: Century Foundation Press.
8.
DyeThomas R.1995. Federalism: A return to the future. Madison Review1: 2–4.
GoreAl.1993. Creating a government that works better and costs less: The report of the National Performance Review. New York: Plume Books.
11.
HepburnMary A.2000. Service learning and civil education in the schools: What does research tell us? In Education for civic engagement in democracy: Service learning and other promising practices, edited byMannSheilahPatrickJohn J.. Bloomington: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
12.
HibbingJohn R.Theiss-MorseElizabeth, eds. 2001. What is it about government that Americans dislike?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HosanskyDavid. 1995. The other war over mandates. Governing8: 26–28.
14.
KellyJanet M.1994. Mandate reimbursement measures in the states. American Review of Public Administration24, no. 4: 351–73.
15.
KurtzKarl. 1992. Limiting terms: What's in store. State Legislatures18: 33–35.
16.
LeavittMichael. 1995. Restoring states to their historic, rightful role. Governing8, no. 5: 11.
17.
McGuireTherese. 1995. Issues and challenges in state and local finances. Policy Forum: Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois8: 1–4.
NewmanMeredith A.LovrichNicholas P.. 2000. Washington. In Home rule in America: A fifty-state handbook, edited by Dale Krane, PlatonRigosN.HillMelvin, 436–44. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
20.
NiceDavidFredericksenPatricia. 1995. The politics of intergovernmental relations, 2nd ed.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
21.
NyeJoseph S.ZelikowPhilip O.KingDavid C., eds. 1997. Why people don't trust government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22.
OsborneDavidd GaeblerTe. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
RauschJohn David. 1996. The politics of term limits. In Constitutional politics in the states: Contemporary controversies and historical patterns, edited byAlan TarrG.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
24.
RobertsGene. 1996. The local press is a tragedy waiting to happen. The Washington Spectator, 1 July, 1.
25.
SandelMichael. 1996. Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
26.
SeligmanAdam B.1997. The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
SteelBrentLovrichNicholasPierceJohn. 1994. Effects of knowledge on voter opinion about taxes in Oregon and Washington. State and Local Government Review26, no. 2: 89–103.
28.
WinterWilliam F.1993. Hard truths/tough choices: An agenda for state and local reform—The first report of the National Commission on the State and Local Public Service. Albany, NY: The Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government.
