AllisonPaul D.1984. Event history analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 07–046. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
2.
BerryFrances Stokes. 1994. Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal22, no. 3: 442–56.
3.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review84 (June): 395–416.
4.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states 1960–1993. American Journal of Political Science42 (January): 327–48.
5.
BonnerRaymond. 2001. Ban on execution of the retarded is vetoed in Texas. New York Times, 18 June, A6.
6.
BracePaulGann HallMelinda. 1995. Studying courts comparatively: The view from the American states. Political Research Quarterly48, no. 1: 5–29.
EmmertCraig F.Ann TrautCarol. 1994. The California Supreme Court and the death penalty. American Politics Quarterly22, no. 1: 41–61.
10.
EntzerothLyn. 2001. Putting the mentally retarded criminal defendant to death: Charting the development of a national consensus to exempt the mentally retarded from the death penalty. Alabama Law Review52, no. 3: 911–41.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.2001. Policy diffusion as a geographic expansion of the scope of political conflict: Same-sex marriage bans in the 1990s. State Politics and Policy Quarterly1 (spring): 5–26.
14.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.MeierKenneth J.1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of conflict. Journal of Politics58 (May): 332–49.
15.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1996. Justices' responses to case facts: An interactive model. American Politics Quarterly24, no. 2: 237–61.
KeyesDenis W.EdwardsWilliam. 1997. Mental retardation and the death penalty: Current status of exemption legislation. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter21 (September–October): 687–96.
18.
KeyesDenisEdwardsWilliamPerskeRobert. 1997. People with mental retardation are dying, legally. Mental Retardation (February): 59–63.
19.
LaneCharles. 2002. Court bars execution of mentally retarded. Washington Post, 21 June, A1.
20.
MeierKenneth J.1994. The politics of sin. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
21.
MintromMichael. 1997. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science41 (July): 738–70.
22.
MontgomeryLori.2002. Maryland suspends death penalty. Washington Post, 10 May, A1.
23.
MooneyChristopher Z.2001. The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy. New York: Chatham House Publishers, Seven Bridges Press.
24.
MooneyChristopher Z.LeeMei-Hsien. 1995. Legislating morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science39 (August): 599–627.
25.
MooneyChristopher Z.LeeMei-Hsien1999. The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states. Policy Studies Journal27, no. 4: 766–80.
26.
MooneyChristopher Z.LeeMei-Hsien2000. The influence of values on consensus and contentious morality policy: U.S. death penalty reform, 1956–82. Journal of Politics62 (February): 223–39.
27.
NorranderBarbara. 2001. Measuring state public opinion with the Senate National Election Study. State Politics and Policy Quarterly1 (spring): 111–25.
28.
PiercePatrick A.MillerDonald E.. 1999. Variations in the diffusion of state lottery adoptions: How revenue dedication changes morality politics. Policy Studies Journal27, no. 4: 696–706.
29.
ReedEmily Fabrycki. 1993. The Penry penalty: Capital punishment and offenders with mental retardation. Lan-ham, Md.: University Press of America.
30.
ReinLisa. 2002. Delegates shelve bill on executions. Washington Post, 19 February, B4.
31.
Statacorp. 1999. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. College Station, Tex.: Stata Corporation.
32.
SteikerCarolSteikerJordan. 1998. Defending categorical exemptions to the death penalty: Reflections on the ABA's resolutions concerning the executions of juveniles and persons with mental retardation. Law and Contemporary Problems61 (autumn): 89–104.
33.
TrautCarol AnnEmmertCraig F.. 1998. Expanding the integrated model of judicial decision making: The California justices and the death penalty. Journal of Politics60 (November): 1166–80.
34.
WalkerJ. L.1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review63 (September): 880–99.
35.
YardleyJim. 2001. 2 groups help sway Texas governor on veto. New York Times, 19 June, A18.