BentonJ. E.GambleD.. 1984. City/county consolidation and economies of scale: Evidence from a time-series analysis in Jacksonville, Florida. Social Science Quarterly64: 190–98.
2.
BlodgettT.1996. Current city-county consolidation attempts. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Counties.
3.
BoyneG.1992. Local government structure and performance: Lessons from America?Public Administration70: 333–57.
4.
BunchB. S.StraussR. P.. 1992. Municipal consolidation: An analysis of the financial benefits for fiscally distressed small municipalities. Urban Affairs Quarterly27: 615–29.
5.
CarrJ. B.FeiockR. C.. 1999. Metropolitan government and economic development. Urban Affairs Review34: 476–88.
6.
CarverJ.1973. Responsiveness and consolidation: A case study. Urban Affairs Quarterly9: 211–45.
7.
CondreyS. E.1994. Organizational and personnel impacts of local government consolidation: Athens–Clarke County, Georgia. Journal of Urban Affairs16: 371–83.
8.
DolanD. A.1990. Local government fragmentation: Does it drive up the cost of government?Urban Affairs Quarterly26: 28–45.
9.
DurningD.1995. The effect of city-county government consolidation: The perspectives of united government employees in Athens–Clarke County, Georgia. Public Administration Quarterly (fall): 272–98.
10.
IsinE. F.WolfsonJ.. 1999. The making of the megacity: An introduction. Urban Studies Programme working paper, no. 21. York University. Toronto.
11.
LornicJ.2001. The decline and fall of the great Canadian cities. Saturday Night116: 36–42.
12.
LyonsW. E.1977. The politics of city-county merger: The Lexington–Fayette County experience. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
13.
LyonsW. E.LoweryD.. 1989. Governmental fragmentation versus consolidation: Five public choice myths about how to create informed, involved, and happy citizens. Public Administration Review49: 533–43.
14.
MillerD.MirandaR.RoqueR.WilfC.. 1995. The fiscal organization of metropolitan areas: The Allegheny County case reconsidered. Publius25: 19–35.
NelsonM.1992. Municipal amalgamation and the growth of the local public sector in Sweden. Journal of Regional Science32: 39–53.
17.
NeumanL.2002. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 5/e. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
Ottawa City Auditor. 2001. City auditor's report on transition costs. 13 March.
19.
RazinE.RosentraubM.. 2000. Are fragmentation and sprawl interlinked? North American evidence. Urban Affairs Review35: 821–36.
20.
RosentraubM.2000. City-county consolidation and the rebuilding of image: The fiscal lessons from Indianapolis's UniGov program. State and Local Government Review32: 180–92.
21.
SavitchH. V.1994. Reorganization in three cities explaining the disparity between intended actions and unanticipated consequences. Urban Affairs Quarterly29: 565–95.
22.
VengroffR.WhelanR.. 2001. Decentralization a la carte: Municipal reform, municipal consolidation and the rule of the MRCs in Quebec. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, 30 August–2 September, San Francisco.
23.
VojnovicI.2000. The transitional impacts of municipal consolidation. Journal of Urban Affairs22: 385–417.
24.
WolfsonJ.FriskenF.. 2000. Local response to the global challenge: Comparing economic development policies in a regional context. Journal of Urban Affairs22: 361–84.