Local Government Autonomy and Fiscal Stress: The Case of California Counties

Boyne George A. 1996. Competition and local government: A public choice perspective. Urban Studies 33 (4–5): 703–21.

Bradbury Katherine L. 1982. Fiscal distress in large U.S. cities. New England Economic Journal (November–December): 33–44.

Carlsen Fredrick . 1995. Why is central regulation of local spending decisions so pervasive? Evidence from a case study. Public Budgeting and Finance 15, no. 1 (spring): 43–57.

Chapman Jeffrey I. 1998a. Proposition 13: Some unintended consequences. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco.

Chapman Jeffrey I. 1998b. The continuing redistribution of fiscal stress: The long-run consequences of Proposition 13. Working paper. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Mass.

Chapman Jeffrey I. 1998c. Proposition 13: Tax limitations and unintended consequences. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Chairman's Roundtable, Cambridge, Mass.

Clark Gordon L. 1984. A theory of local autonomy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74, no. 2: 195–208.

Diaz Daniel Paul Green Gary . 2001. Fiscal stress and growth management effort in Wisconsin cities, villages, and towns. State and Local Government Review 33, no. 1 (winter): 7–22.

Dresch Marla Sheffrin Steven M. . 1997. The role of development fees and exactions in local public finance. State Tax Notes (December 1): 1411–16.

Eisenhardt Kathleen M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14, no. 1: 57–74.

Gurr Ted R. King Desmond S. . 1987. The state and the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hamilton Bruce W. 1976. Capitalization of interjuris-dictional differences in local tax rates. American Economic Review 66 (December): 743–53.

Kalchheim Chaim Rozevitch Shimon . 1990. Deficits in local government budgets in Israel: A reflection of political cycles and an expression of local autonomy. Public Budgeting and Finance 10, no. 1 (spring): 67–76.

Klaphake Ron . 1998. Montana's local government review process: Innovative constitutional theory and civic practice. DPA diss., University of Southern California.

Legislative Analyst's Office. State of California. 1998. Cal Facts (December). Sacramento. http://www.lao.ca.gov.

—–. 2001. Realignment revisited: An evaluation of the 1991 experiment in state-county relations (February 6). Sacramento.

Leibenstein Harvey . 1976. Beyond economic man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lewis Paul G. 2000. The durability of local government structures: Evidence from California. State and Local Government Review 32, no. 1 (winter): 34–48.

Logan John R. Molotch Harvey L. . 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lynn Laurence E. Jr. Heinrich Carolyn J. Hill Carolyn J. . 2001. Improving governance. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Olson Mancur . 1982. The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Pressman Jeffrey L. Wildavsky Aaron B. . 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Sokolow Alvin D. 1993. State-local relations in California: What happens when they take away the property tax. Working paper. Department of Community Development, University of California–Davis.

Wolman Harold Goldsmith Michael . 1990. Local autonomy as a meaningful analytic concept. Urban Affairs Quarterly 26, no. 1 (September): 3–27.