BarrettL. I.1989. Giving the public what it wants. Time, 23 October, 34.
4.
BarzelayM.BabakA. J.. 1992. Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BendickM.1989. Privatizing the delivery of social services: An idea to be taken seriously. In Privatization and the welfare state, edited byKamermanS. B.KahnA. J.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
6.
BerenyiE. B.StevensB.. 1988. Does privatization work? A study of the delivery of eight local services. State and Local Government Review20: 11–20.
7.
City of Charlotte. 2001a. Charlotte story: Public service is our business. Charlotte, N.C.: City of Charlotte.
8.
City of Charlotte. 2001b. FY2000 year-end report. Charlotte, N.C.: City of Charlotte.
9.
DruckerP. F.1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper and Row.
10.
GreeneJ. D.1994. Does privatization make a difference? The impact of private contracting on municipal efficiency. International Journal of Public Administration 17, no. 7: 1299–325.
11.
Harvard Business School. 1998. 1999. Harvard business school case studies A and B on the city of Charlotte's balanced scorecard implementation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
12.
HodgeG. A.1997. Contracting out: Just another fad or fundamental reform?Journal of Economic and Social Policy 2, no. 1: 54–65.
13.
HodgeG. A.. 2000. Privatization: An international review of performance. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
14.
HolmesP. A.1985. Taking public services private: A growing trend cuts government costs. Nation's Business 73, no. 8: 18–24.
15.
JurkiewiczC. L.MasseyT. K.Jr.BrownR. G.. 1998. Motivation in public and private organizations: A comparative study. Public Productivity and Management Review 21, no. 3: 230–50.
16.
KaplanR. S.NortonD. P.. 1996. The balanced scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
KleinerA.1995. The battle for the soul of corporate America: Hammerism battles Demingism for how the corporation (or society) should be governed in the information age. Wired (August): 121–171ff.
18.
KotterJ. P.1992. Power, dependence, and effective management. In Managing people and organizations, edited byGabarroJ. J.. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.
19.
LeTartJ.1997. Technology frees HR's time for strategy. HR Magazine42: 78–84.
20.
NahavandiA.1997. The art and science of leadership. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
OsborneD.PlastrikP.. 1997. Banishing bureaucracy. New York: Addison-Wesley.
23.
ParkerD.1992. Agency status, privatization and improved performance: Some evidence from the UK. International Journal of Public Sector Management 5, no. 1: 30–38.
24.
SavasE. S.1994. On privitization. In Current issues in public administration, edited byLaneF. S.. New York: St. Martin's Press.
25.
SyfertP.2000. Managing change. Lecture at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte. 18 April.