ArnsteinSherry R.1969. A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal35: 216–24.
2.
BacotA. HunterDawesRoy A.. 1996. Responses to federal devolution: Measuring state environmental efforts. State and Local Government Review 28, no. 2: 124–35.
3.
BlomquistWilliamSchlagerEdella. 2000. Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, 24 March, San Jose.
4.
BowmanAnn O'M.KearneyRichard C.. 1986. The resurgence of the states. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BrownGregHarrisCharles. 2000. The U.S. Forest Service: Whither the new resource management paradigm?Journal of Environmental Management58: 1–19.
6.
BrownR. StevenMarshallKaren. 1996. Ecosystem management in state governments. Ecological Applications 6, no. 3: 721–23.
7.
CalvertJerry W.1989. Party politics and environmental policy. In Environmental politics and policy, edited byLesterJames P., 158–73. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
8.
CarterLarry E.LaPlantJames T.1997. Diffusion of health care policy innovation in the United States. State and Local Government Review 29, no. 1: 17–26.
9.
CortnerHanna J.MooteMargaret A.. 1999. The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
10.
DavenportThomas E.PhillipsNancy J.KirschnerBruce A.KirschnerLyn T.. 1996. The watershed protection approach: A framework for ecosystem protection. Water, Science, and Technology 33, no. 4-5: 23–26.
11.
DillmanDon. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12.
DuramLeslie A.BrownKatharine G.. 1999. Assessing public participation in U.S. watershed planning initiatives. Society and Natural Resources12: 455–67.
13.
FeiockRichard C.RowlandC. K.. 1990. Environmental regulation and economic development: The movement of chemical production among states. Western Political Quarterly43: 561–76.
14.
GogginMalcolm L.BowmanAnn O'M.LesterJames P.O'TooleLaurence J.Jr.1990. Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown.
15.
HagerAlan. 1997. State school lands: Does the federal trust mandate prevent preservation?Natural Resources and Environment 12, no. 1: 39–45.
16.
JacobsonSusan K.MarynowskiSusan B.. 1997. Public attitudes and knowledge about ecosystem management on Department of Defense land in Florida. Conservation Biology 11, no. 3: 770–81.
17.
JohnDeWitt. 1994. Civic environmentalism: Alternatives to regulation in states and communities. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
18.
KelloggWendy A.1998. Adopting an ecosystem approach: Local variability in Remedial Action Planning. Society and Natural Resources11: 465–83.
19.
KoontzTomas M.1997. Differences between state and federal public forest management: The importance of rules. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27, no. 1: 15–37.
20.
KoontzTomas M.. 1999. Citizen participation: Conflicting interests in state and national agency policy making. The Social Science Journal 36, no. 3: 441–58.
21.
LesterJames P.1995. Federalism and state environmental policy. In Environmental politics and policy: Theories and evidence, edited byLesterJames P.. 2d ed.Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
22.
LesterJames P.LombardEmmett N.. 1990. The comparative analysis of state environmental policy. Natural Resources Journal30: 301–19.
23.
LubellMarkSchneiderMarkScholzJohn T.MeteMihriye. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science46: 148–63.
24.
MaloneCharles R.1998. The federal ecosystem management initiative in the United States. In Ecological sustainability and integrity: Concepts and approaches, edited byLemonsJohnWestraLauraGoodlandRobert, 203–317. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25.
edited by John Lemons. 2000. Ecosystem management policies in state government of the USA. Landscape and Urban Planning48: 57–64.
26.
MoseleyCassandra. 2000. Innovation in crisis: The Applegate Partnership. In Beyond the Great Divide, edited byBrickPhillipVan de WeteringSarahSnowDon. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
27.
Natural Resources Law Center. 1998. The state role in western watershed initiatives. Research Report 18. Boulder: University of Colorado.
28.
PelkeyNeilLeachWilliamHarrisonSkyCookElizabethZafonteMatthewSabatierPaul. 1999. The impacts of social and ecological conditions on the likelihood of stakeholder-based resource management efforts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 4 November, Washington, D.C.
29.
SalantPriscillaDillmanDon. 1994. How to conduct your own survey. New York: Wiley.
30.
SouderJon A.FairfaxSally K.. 1996. State trust lands: History, management, and sustainable use. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
31.
SteelBrentShindlerBruce. 2000. Models for sustainable ecosystem-based management: A comparison of U.S. and Canadian public support. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, 17 June, Bellingham, Wash.
32.
ThomasCraig W.1999. Linking public agencies with community-based watershed organizations: Lessons from California. Policy Studies Journal 27, no. 3: 54464.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1994. Ecosystem management: Additional actions needed to adequately test a promising approach. GAO/RCED-94-111. Washington, D.C.