Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1993. State laws governing local government structure and administration. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
2.
BentonJ. EdwinGambleDarwin. 1984. City-county consolidation and economies of scale: Evidence from a time series analysis in Jacksonville, Florida. Social Science Quarterly65: 190–98.
3.
BlodgettTerry. 1996. Current city-county consolidation attempts. Washington D.C.: National Association of Counties.
4.
CampbellRichard W.DurningDan. 2000. Is city-county consolidation good policy? A symposium. Public Administration Quarterly 24, no. 2: 133–39.
5.
CarrJered B.2000. The political economy of local government boundary change: State laws, local actors, and collective action. Ph.D. diss., Florida State University.
6.
CarrJered B.FeiockRichard C.. 1999. Metropolitan government and economic development. Urban Affairs Review 34, no. 3: 476–88.
7.
CarrJered B.FeiockRichard C.., ed. forthcoming. Reshaping the local landscape: Perspectives on city-county consolidation and its alternatives. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
8.
CarverJoan. 1973. Responsiveness and consolidation: A case study. Urban Affairs Quarterly 9, no. 2: 211–50.
9.
DeGroveJohn. 1973. City of Jacksonville: Consolidation in action. In Regional governance: Promise and performance. Substate regionalism and federalism. Washington D.C.: ACIR.
10.
DurningDanEdwardsDavid. 1992. The attitudes of consolidation elites: An empirical assessment of their views of city-county mergers. Southeastern Political Review 20, no. 2: 355–83.
11.
FeiockRichard C.CarrJered B.. 1997. A reassessment of city/county consolidation: Economic development impacts. State and Local Government Review 23, no. 3: 166–71.
12.
FeiockRichard C.CarrJered B.. 2000. Private incentives and academic entrepreneurs: The promotion of city/county consolidation. Public Administration Quarterly 24, no. 2: 235–45.
13.
FeiockRichard C.CarrJered B.. 2001. Incentives, entrepreneurs, and boundary change: A collective action framework. Urban Affairs Review 36, no. 3: 382–405.
14.
FleischmannArnold. 2000. Regionalism and city-county consolidation in small metro areas. State and Local Government Review 32, no. 3: 213–26.
15.
HoranJames F.TaylorThomas L.. 1977. Experiments in metropolitan government. New York: Praeger.
16.
JohnsonLinda S.CarrJered B.. 2001. Linking elite attitudes to outcomes of city-county consolidation referenda: An exploratory analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration, Baton Rouge, 11–13 October.
17.
JohnsonLinda S.FeiockRichard C.. 1999. Revolutionary change in local governance: Revisiting the Rosenbaum and Kammerer theory of successful city-county consolidation. Journal of Political Science27 (fall): 21–52.
18.
MarandoVincent L.1979. City-county consolidation: Reform, regionalism, referenda, and requiem. Western Political Quarterly32 (December): 409–21.
19.
MarandoVincent L.WanamakerDaniel K.. 1972. Political and social variables in city-county consolidation referenda. Polity 4, no. 4: 512–22.
MessingerBoyd R.1989. Local government restructuring: A test of the Rosenbaum-Kammerer theory. Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh.
22.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public good and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
23.
RosenbaumWalter A.KammererGladys M.. 1974. Against long odds: The theory and practice of successful governmental consolidation. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
24.
SchluckebierJack. 1995. A study of the 1992 consolidation charter proposal for Tallahassee and Leon County. Ph.D. diss., Florida State University.
25.
SeamonFredFeiockRichard. 1995. Political participation and city-county consolidation: Jacksonville-Duval County. International Journal of Public Administration18: 1741–52.
26.
SiegelSidneyCastellanN. JohnJr.1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
SwansonBert. 2000. Quandaries of pragmatic reform: A reassessment of the Jacksonville experience. State and Local Government Review 32, no. 3: 227–37.