Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1995. Significant features of fiscal federalism. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
2.
AmmonsDavid N.1990. Administrative analysis for local government. Athens: Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.
3.
BaltagiBadi H.1995. Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BorgMary O.MasonPaul M.. 1988. The budgetary incidence of a lottery to support education. National Tax Journal41: 75–85.
5.
BuchananJames M.1963. The economics of earmarked taxes. Journal of Political Economy71: 457–69.
6.
BunchBeverly S.1988. Variations in state government capital spending and debt practices: An empirical analysis. Ph.D. diss., Carnegie Mellon University.
7.
ClementsBetty J.WeeksJ. Devereux. 1997. County and municipal revenue sources in Georgia. Athens: Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.
8.
DeranElizabeth. 1965. Earmarking and expenditures: A survey and a new test. National Tax Journal25: 223–28.
9.
DyeRichard F.McGuireTherese J.. 1992. The effect of earmarked revenues on the level and composition of expenditures. Public Finance Quarterly 20, no. 4: 543–56.
10.
EklundP.1972. A theory of earmarking appraised. National Tax Journal25: 223–28.
11.
Georgia Department of Community Affairs. 1984-97. Local government operations survey. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Community Affairs.
12.
EklundP.. 1984-97. Report of local government finances. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Community Affairs.
13.
EklundP.. 1994. Local option sales taxes (1989-1993). Atlanta: Georgia Department of Community Affairs. Georgia Department of Revenue. 1999. Revenue charts. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Revenue.
14.
GramlichEdward M.1969. State and local governments and their budget constraints. International Economic Review10 (June): 163–82.
15.
JungChanghoon. 2001. Does the local option sales tax provide property tax relief? The Georgia case. Public Budgeting & Finance 21, no. 1: 73–86.
16.
KimKarl E.1987. Public capital investment in large American cities. Discussion paper no. 2. Manoa: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
17.
KmentaJan. 1986. Elements of econometrics. New York: Macmillan.
18.
MillerDonald E.PiercePatrick A.. 1997. Lotteries for education: Windfall or hoax?State and Local Government Review 29, no. 1: 34–42.
19.
PaganoMichael A.MooreRichard. 1985. Cities and fiscal choices: A new model of urban public investment. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
20.
PerezArturoSnellRonald. 1995. Earmarking state taxes. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.
21.
PetersenJohn E.1968. The determinants of state and local government capital outlays. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
22.
PetersenJohn E.HolsteinCatherineWeissBarbara. 1993. The future of infrastructure needs and financing. In The handbook of municipal bonds and public finance, edited byLambRobertLeiglandJamesRappaportStephen, 724–80. New York: New York Institute of Finance.
23.
PoterbaJames. 1987. Capital budgets, borrowing rules, and state capital spending. An MIT and NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, Mass.
24.
SayersLois W.1989. Pooled time series analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
25.
SpindlerCharles J.1995. The lottery and education: Robbing Peter to pay Paul?Public Budgeting and Finance 15, no. 3: 54–62.
26.
University of Georgia. 1983-97. The Georgia county guide. Athens: Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development, University of Georgia.