BarrettKatherineGreeneRichard. 1999. Grading the states: A management report card. Governing, February, 17–90.
2.
BarrettKatherineGreeneRichard. 2001. Powering up: How public managers take control of information technology. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
3.
BarrettKatherineGreeneRichardMarianiMichele. 2001. Grading the states. Governing, February, 20–90.
4.
BarrilleauxCharlesFeiockRichardCrewRobert E.Jr.1992. Measuring and comparing American states' administrative characteristics. state and Local Government Review 24, no. 1: 12–18.
5.
BarzelayMichaelArmajaniBabak J.. 1992. Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BehnRobert D.1999. Do goals help create innovative organizations? In Public management reform and innovation: Research, theory, and application, edited byFredericksonH. GeorgeJohnsonJocelyn M., 70–88. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
7.
BehnRobert D.KantPeter A.. 1999. Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting. Public Productivity and Management Review22 (June): 470–89.
8.
BerkmanMichaelReenockChristopher. 2000. Building the American states: Executive branch reform and reorganization, 1952–1992. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 19–22 April, Chicago.
9.
BerryFrances S.ChackerianRichardWechslerBarton. 1999. Reinventing government: Lessons from a state capital. In Public management reform and innovation: Research, theory, and application, edited byFredericksonH. GeorgeJohnsonJocelyn M., 329–55. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
10.
BowlingCynthiaWrightDeil S.. 1998. Change and continuity in state administration: Administrative leadership across four decades. Public Administration Review58 (September-October): 429–42.
11.
BrudneyJeffrey L.HebertF. TedWrightDeil S.. 1999. Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review59 (January-February): 19–30.
12.
ChackerianRichard. 1996. Reorganization and state government: 1900–1985. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6 (January): 25–47.
13.
ChoChung-laeWrightDeil S.. 2001. The devolution revolution in the 1990s: Changing patterns and perceptions of state administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, 29 August-2 September, San Francisco.
14.
ConantJames K.2000. Management consequences of the 1960–1990 “modernization” of state government. In Handbook of state government administration, edited byGarganJohn J., 13–22. New York: Marcel Dekker.
15.
DonahueAmy KneedlerSeldenSallyIn-grahamPatricia. 2000. Measuring government management capacity: A comparative analysis of city human resources management systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (April): 381–411.
16.
DonahueJohn D.1999. The devolution revolution: Hazardous crosscurrents confronting inequality in an era of devolution. New York: Century Foundation Press.
17.
DownsAnthony. 1967. Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
18.
DurningDan. 1995. Governors and administrative reform in the 1990s. State and Local Government Review 27, no. 1: 36–54.
FredericksonH. George. 1996. Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review56 (May-June): 263–70.
21.
GarnettJames L.1980. Reorganizing state government: The executive branch. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
22.
HoveyHarold A.1999. Can the states afford devolution? The fiscal implications of shifting federal responsibilities to state and local governments. New York: Century Foundation Press.
23.
IngrahamPatricia W.KneedlerAmy E.. 2000. Dissecting the black box revisited: Characterizing government management capacity. In Advancing public management: New developments in theory, methods, and practice, edited byBrudneyJeffrey L.O'TooleLaurence J.RaineyHal G., 235–52. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
KostJohn M.1996. New approaches to public management: The case of Michigan. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
26.
LightPaul C.1997. The tides of reform making government work: 1945–1995. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27.
LueckSarah. 1999. Survey measures satisfaction with federal service. Wall Street Journal, 13 December, A2.
28.
LynnLaurence E.HeinrichCarolyn J., eds. 2000. Governance and performance: Models, methods, and results. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
29.
MarchJames G.OlsonJohan P.. 1983. What administrative reorganization tells us about governing. American Political Science Review77 (June): 281–96.
30.
MillerTrudi C.1984. Public sector performance: A conceptual turning point. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
NathanRichard P.1996. The “devolution revolution”: An overview. Rockefeller Institute Bulletin, 5–15. Albany: State University of New York.
32.
National Academy of Public Administration. 1999. A government to trust and respect: Rebuilding citizen-government relations for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: Report of the Panel on Civic Trust and Citizen Responsibility, National Academy of Public Administration.
33.
OsborneDavidGaeblerTed. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin Books.
34.
PetersB. GuyPierreJohn. 1998. Governance without government: Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8 (April): 223–43.
35.
PressmanJeffrey L.1975. Federal programs and city politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
PressmanJeffrey L.WildavskyAaron B.. 1973. Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
SchneiderWilliam. 1992. Off with their heads: The confidence gap and the revolt against professionalism in American politics. In Reexamining democracy, edited byMarksGaryDiamondLarry, 315–31. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
38.
SigelmanLee. 1976. The quality of state administration: An exploration in the American States. Administration and Society8: 107–44.
39.
ThompsonFrank J., ed. 1993. Revitalizing state and local public service: Strengthening performance, accountability, and citizen confidence. National Commission on the State and Local Public Service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
ThompsonFrank J.,. 1995. Executive leadership as an enduring institutional issue. State and Local Government Review 27, no. 1: 7–17.
41.
VolckerPaul A.WinterWilliam F.. 1994. Introduction: Democracy and public service. In Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? edited byDiIulioJohn J., xi–xvii. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
42.
WrightDeil S.ChoChung-lae. 2001. American State Administrators Project (ASAP) overview: Major features of the ASAP surveys, 1964–1998. Chapel Hill: Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina.