ACIR. See U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
2.
CarrnsAnn. 1998. In Charlotte, the sky really is the limit. The Wall Street Journal (October 9).
3.
City-County Consolidation Study Committee (Charlotte-Mecklenburg County). 1984. Final report (November).
4.
KorosecRonnie LaCourseMeadTimothy D.. 1996. Lessons from privatization task forces: Comparative case studies. Policy Studies Journal24 (Winter): 641–48.
5.
LyonsSchley R.1972. Citizen attitudes and metropolitan government. Charlotte: Institute for Urban Studies and Community Service, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
6.
MeadTimothy D.1985. Functional consolidation of metropolitan services: A case study. Paper prepared for presentation at the meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Norfolk, Va., April 18–20.
7.
MeadTimothy D.. 1996. Functional consolidation and regionalism. Twelfth conference on the small city and regional community, 267–72. Peter B. Meyer and Thomas S. Lyons, eds. Stevens Point, Wis.: Center for the Small City, University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point.
8.
RuskDavid. 1993. Cities without suburbs. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.