ACIR. See U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
2.
AltshulerAlanMorillWilliamWolmanHaroldMitchellFaith, eds. 1999. Governance and opportunity in metropolitan America. Washington, D.C.: Committee on Improving the Future of U.S. Cities through Improved Metropolitan Area Governance; National Academy Press.
3.
BaerSusanMarandoVincent L.. The sub-districting of cities: Applying the polycentric model. Journal of Urban Affairs (forthcoming).
4.
BlomquistWilliam A.ParksRoger B.. 1995. Fiscal, service, and political impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County's Unigov. Publius25, no. 4 (Fall): 37–54.
5.
DownsAnthony. 1976. Urban problems and prospects. 2d ed.Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
7.
FishmanRobert. 2000. The death and life of American regional planning. In Reflections on regionalism, 107–23. Bruce Katz, ed. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
8.
GuhathakurtaSubhrajitWichertMichele L.. 1998. Who pays for growth in the city of Phoenix?Urban Affairs Review33, no. 6 (July): 813–38.
9.
HirschWerner Z.1984. Urban economics. New York: Macmillan.
10.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
11.
LewisPaul G.1996. Shaping suburbia: How political institutions organize urban development. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
LoweryDavid. 2000. A transactions costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation versus redistribution in urban America. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10, no. 1 (January): 49–78.
13.
OakersonRonald J.1999a. Governance structures and problem-solving in metropolitan areas: Responding to (Downsian) growth-related problems. Paper prepared for presentation at the Workshop on the Workshop II, Bloomington, Ind., June 9–13.
14.
OakersonRonald J.. 1999b. Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, Calif.: ICS Press.
15.
OakersonRonald J.ParksRoger B.. 1988. Citizen voice and public entrepreneurship: The organizational dynamic of a complex metropolitan county. Publius18, no. 4 (Fall): 91–112.
16.
OakersonRonald J.ParksRoger B.. 1989. Local government constitutions: A different view of metropolitan governance. American Review of Public Administration19, no. 4 (December): 279–94.
17.
OrfieldMyron. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
18.
OstromVincentBishRobertOstromElinor. 1988. Local government in the United States. San Francisco: ICS Press.
OstromVincentTieboutCharlesWarrenRobert. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review55 (December): 831–42.
21.
ParksRoger B.1985. Metropolitan structure and systemic performance: The case of police service delivery. In Policy implementation in federal and unitary states, 161–91. Kenneth Hanf and Theo A. J. Toonen, eds. Dordrecht: Martinus-Nijhoff.
22.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.. 1989. Metropolitan organization and governance: A local public economy approach. Urban Affairs Quarterly25, no. 1 (September): 18–29.
23.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.. 1990. Local taxes, spending, and public accountability: How Wisconsin compares. Milwaukee: Wisconsin Policy Research Institute.
24.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.. 1993. Comparative metropolitan organization: Service production and governance structures in St. Louis and Allegheny Counties. Publius23, no. 1 (Winter): 19–39.
25.
ParksRoger B.BakerPaul C.KiserLarryOakersonRonaldalet. 1982. Coproduction of public services. In Analyzing urban service distributions, 185–99. Richard C. Rich, ed. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
26.
PowellJohn A.2000. Addressing regional dilemmas for minority communities. In Reflections on regionalism, 218–46. Bruce Katz, ed. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
27.
RosentraubMark. 2000. City-county consolidation and the rebuilding of image: The fiscal lessons from Indianapolis's UniGov program. State and Local Government Review32, no. 3 (Fall): 180–91.
28.
RuskDavid. 1995. Cities without suburbs. 2d ed.Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
29.
SavasE. S.1987. Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
30.
SavitchHankVogelRon. 2000. Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. State and Local Government Review32, no. 3 (Fall 2000): 198–212.
31.
SokolowAlvin. 1993. State rules and the city-county arena: Competition for land and taxes in California's Central Valley. Publius23, no. 1 (Winter): 53–69.
TeafordJon C.1979. City and suburb: The political fragmentation of metropolitan America, 1850–1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
TeafordJon C.. 1997. Post-suburbia: Government and politics in the edge cities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35.
TeskePaulSchneiderMarkMintromMichaelBestSamuel. 1993. Establishing the micro foundations of a macro theory: Information, movers, and the competitive local market for public goods. American Political Science Review87, no. 3 (September): 702–13.
36.
TieboutCharles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy44: 416–24.
37.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1982. State and local roles in the federal system. Report A-88. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
38.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1987. The organization of local public economies. Report A-109. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
39.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1988. Metropolitan organization: The St. Louis case. Report M-158. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
40.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1992. Metropolitan organization: The Allegheny County case. Report M-181, Washington, D.C.: ACIR.