ACIR. See U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
2.
BerryWilliam D.LoweryDavid. 1987. Understanding United States government growth: An empirical analysis of the postwar era. New York: Praeger.
3.
BermanDavid R.1997. State and local politics. 8th ed.Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
4.
BollensScott A.1986. Examining the link between state policy and the creation of special districts. State and Local Government Review18: 118–24.
5.
BrennanGeoffreyBuchananJames. 1980. The power to tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BurnsNancy. 1994. The formation of American local governments: Private values in public institutions. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
CiglerBeverly A.1995. County governance in the 1990s. State and Local Government Review27: 55–70.
8.
DoigJameson W.MitchellJerry. 1992. Expertise, democracy, and the public authority model: Groping toward accommodation. In Public authorities and public policy.MitchellJerry, ed. New York: Greenwood Press.
9.
DyeThomas R.FeiockRichard C.. 1995. State income tax adoption and economic growth. Social Science Quarterly76: 648–54.
10.
FeiockRichard C.CarrJered. 1999. An economic theory of local boundaries and boundary change. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association meeting, Seattle, March 25–27.
11.
FleischmannArnold. 1986. The goals and strategies of local boundary changes: Government organization or private gain?Journal of Urban Affairs4: 63–75.
12.
FosterKathryn A.1997. The political economy of special-purpose government. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
13.
FoxSharon E.LeeJeong-Hwa. 1996. Determinants of foreign firm location decisions in the United States, 1985–1990. American Politics Quarterly24: 81–104.
14.
HenriquesDiana B.1986. The machinery of greed. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
15.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
16.
JoycePhilip G.MullinsDaniel R.. 1991. The changing structure of the state and local sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Administration Review51: 240–53.
17.
KingGary. 1989a. Variance specification in event count models: From restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator. American Journal of Political Science33: 762–84.
18.
KingGary. 1989b. Unifying political methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LeiglandJames. 1992. External controls on public authorities and other special purpose governments. In Public authorities and public policy. Jerry Mitchell, ed. New York: Greenwood Press.
20.
MacManusSusan A.1981. Special district governments: A note on their use as property tax relief mechanisms in the 1970s. Journal of Politics43: 1207–14.
21.
MarandoVincent. 1974. The politics of metropolitan reform. Administration and Society6: 229–62.
22.
NelsonMichael A.1990. Decentralization of the sub-national public sector: An empirical analysis of the determinants of local government structure in metropolitan areas in the U.S. Southern Economic Journal57: 443–57.
23.
NorthDouglass C.1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
25.
OstromVincentTieboutCharles M.WarrenRobert. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review55: 831–42.
26.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.. 1989. Metropolitan organization and governance: A local public economy approach. Urban Affairs Quarterly25: 18–29.
27.
PetersonPaul. 1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
PivenFrances FoxFriedlandRoger. 1984. Public choice and private power: A theory of fiscal crisis. In Public service provision and urban development.AndrewKirbyPaulKnoxStevenPinch, eds. New York: St. Martin's Press.
29.
RigosPlaton N.SpindlerCharles J.. 1991. Municipal incorporation and state statutes: A state-level analysis. State and Local Government Review23: 76–81.
30.
SchneiderMarkTeskePaul. 1995. Public entrepreneurs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31.
StephensG. RossWikstromNelson. 1998. Trends in special districts. State and Local Government Review30: 129–38.
32.
StoneClarence. 1987. Summing up: Urban regimes, development policy, and political arrangements. In The politics of urban development.StoneClarence N.SandersHeywood T., eds. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
33.
TaoJillFeiockRichard C.. 1999. Directing benefits to need: The redistributive consequences of urban economic development. Economic Development Quarterly13: 55–66.
34.
TieboutCharles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64: 416–24.
35.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1964. 1993. 1994. 1995. The problem of special districts in American government. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
36.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1972. 1977. 1982. 1987. 1992. Census of governments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO.
37.
VogelRonald K.SwansonBert E.. 1989. The growth machine versus the antigrowth coalition. Urban Affairs Quarterly25: 63–85.