ConlanTimothy. 1986. Federalism and competing values in the Reagan administration. Publius16: 29–47.
5.
ConlanTimothy. 1988. New federalism: Intergovernmental reform from Nixon to Reagan. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
6.
ConlanTimothy J.WalkerDavid B.. 1983. Reagan's new federalism: Design, debate, and discord. Intergovernmental Perspective8, no. 4 (Winter): 6–22.
7.
CorwinEdward S.1950. The passing of dual federalism. Virginia Law Review36: 1–24.
8.
DilgerRobert Jay. 1989. National intergovernmental programs. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
9.
DilgerRobert Jay. 1998. TEA-21: Transportation policy, pork barrel politics, and American federalism. Publius28, no. 1: 49–69.
10.
DownsAnthony. 1996. The devolution revolution: Why Congress is shifting a lot of power to the wrong levels. Brookings Policy Brief no. 3. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
11.
EdelmanMurray. 1967. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12.
ElazarDaniel J.1962. The American partnership: Intergovernmental co-operation in the nineteenth-century United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GrodzinsMorton. 1960. The federal system. In Report of the President's Commission on National Goals, The American Assembly, Goals for America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
15.
GrodzinsMorton. 1966. The American system. Chicago: Rand McNally.
16.
GulloTheresa A.KellyJanet M.. 1998. Federal unfunded mandate reform: A first-year retrospective. Public Administration Review58, no. 5 (September/October): 379–87.
KincaidJohn. 1990. From cooperative to coercive federalism. In American federalism: The third century, 139–52. Special issue of Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.KincaidJohn, ed. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
19.
KincaidJohn. 1992. Developments in federal-state relations, 1990–91. Book of the states 1992–93. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.
20.
KincaidJohn. 1998. The devolution tortoise and the centralization hare. New England Economic Review (May/June): 13–52.
21.
KochWendy. 1999. Bill would grant schools flexibility with federal aid. USA Today (March 1): 2A.
22.
LindblomCharles E.1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review19 (Spring): 79–88.
23.
McDowellBruce D.1997. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations in 1996: The end of an era. Publius27 (Spring): 111–27.
24.
NathanRichard P.1996. The devolution revolution: An overview. Rockefeller Institute Bulletin 1996. Albany, N.Y.: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
SchneiderSaundra K.1997. Medicaid Section 1115 Waivers: Shifting health care reform to the states. Publius27 (Spring): 89–109.
40.
SchramSanford F.WeissertCarol S.. 1997. The state of American federalism, 1996–1997. Publius27 (Spring): 1–13.
41.
ShannonJohn. 1983. Federal and state-local spenders go their separate ways. Intergovernmental Perspective8, no. 4 (Winter): 23–29.
42.
ShannonJohn. 1987. The return of fend-for-yourself federalism: The Reagan mark. Intergovernmental Perspective13 (Summer/Fall): 34–37.
43.
SharkanskyIra. 1978. The maligned states. 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1980. The federal role in the federal system: The dynamics of growth; hearings on the federal role. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
45.
SharkanskyIra. 1985. The question of state government capacity. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
46.
SharkanskyIra. 1995. Characteristics of federal grant-in-aid programs to state and local governments: Grants funded FY 1995. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
47.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 1999. Budget of the United States government, fiscal year 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO.
48.
SharkanskyIra. 2000. Budget of the United States government, fiscal year 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO.
49.
WalkerDavid. 1995. The rebirth of federalism. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House Publishers.
50.
WallinBruce A.1996. Federal cutbacks and the fiscal condition of the states. Publius26 (Summer): 141–59.