ACIR. See U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
2.
BentonJ. Edwin. 1996. Fiscal aid and mandates: The county experience. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge.MenzelDonald, ed. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
3.
BermanDavid R.1988. State-local relations: Authority, finance, and regional cooperation. In The municipal year book, 1988. Washington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
4.
BermanDavid R.. 1993. County governments in an era of change. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
5.
CiglerBeverly. 1994. The county-state connection: A national study of associations of counties. Public Administration Review54, no. 1 (January/February): 3–11.
6.
CiglerBeverly. 1995. County governance in the 1990s. State and Local Government Review27, no. 1 (Winter): 55–70.
7.
CiglerBeverly. 1996. Revenue diversification among American counties. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge. Donald Menzel, ed. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
8.
DuncombeHerbert Sydney. 1977. Modern county government. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Counties.
9.
SydneyDuncombeDuncombeWilliamKinneyRichard. 1992. Factors influencing the politics and process of county government budgeting. State and Local Government Review24, no. 1 (Winter): 19–27.
10.
EhrenhaltAlan. 1998. Are New England's counties as expendable as they seem? Governing (October): 100.
11.
GAO. See U.S. General Accounting Office.
12.
GoldSteven D.RitchieSara. 1994. State actions affecting cities and counties, 1990–1993: De facto federalism. Public Budgeting & Finance14, no. 2 (Summer): 26–53.
13.
HyRonald JohnBolandCindyHopperRichardSimsRichard. 1993. Measuring revenue capacity and effort of county governments: A case study of Arkansas. Public Administration Review53, no. 3 (May/June): 220–27.
14.
JoycePhilipMullinsDaniel. 1991. The changing fiscal structure of the state and local public sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Administration Review51, no. 3 (May/June): 240–53.
15.
LaddHelen F.1978. An economic evaluation of state limitations on local taxing and spending powers. National Tax Journal31, no. 1 (March): 1–18.
16.
LaddHelen F.YingerJohn. 1989. America's ailing cities: Fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
MackeyScott. 1997. Critical issues in state-local fiscal policy: A guide to local options taxes. Denver, Colo.: National Conference of State Legislatures.
18.
MarandoVincentReevesMavis Mann. 1993. County government structural reform: Influence of state, region, and urbanization. Publius23 (Winter): 41–52.
19.
MarandoVincentThomasRobert D.. 1977. The forgotten governments: County commissioners as policy makers. Gainesville: The University Presses of Florida.
20.
McCabeBarbara Coyle. 1998. State rules and city money. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Association for Budgeting and Financial Management, Washington, D.C., November 5–7.
21.
MenzelDonald C., ed. 1996. The American county: Frontiers of knowledge. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
22.
MullinsDanielJoycePhilip. 1996. Tax and expenditure limitations and state and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance16, no. 1 (Spring): 75–101.
23.
NathanRichard P.1997. The newest new federalism for welfare: Where are we now and where are we headed? In Rockefeller Reports. Albany, N.Y.: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government (October 30).
24.
NathanRichard P.GaisThomas L.. 1998a. Overview report: Implementation of the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996. Albany, N.Y.: Rockefeller Institute of Government.
25.
NathanRichard P.GaisThomas L.. 1998b. Ten early findings about the newest new federalism for welfare. Paper prepared for presentation at the Woodrow Wilson Center Conference on Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom? Washington, D.C., March 27.
26.
PetersenJohn. 1999. The fiscal face of devolution. Governing (February): 100.
27.
PowellDavid. 1996. The effects of tax and expenditure limitations on local school districts and education finance: Restrictive by design. Ph.D. diss., Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
28.
RubinIrene. 1998. Class, tax, and power: Municipal budgeting in the United States. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
29.
SalantTanis J.1991. County governments: An overview. Intergovernmental Perspective17, no. 1 (Winter): 5–9.
30.
SchragPeter. 1998. Paradise lost: California's experience, America's future. New York: New Press.
31.
SextonTerriSheffrinSteven. 1995. Five lessons from tax revolts. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the National Tax Association of America, 175–81. Columbus, Ohio: National Tax Association.
32.
ShadbegianRonald J.1999. The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on the revenue structure of local government, 1962–1987. National Tax Journal52, no. 2 (June): 221–37.
33.
SokolowAlvin D.1993. State rules and the county-city arena: Competition for land and taxes in California's Central Valley. Publius23, no. 1 (Winter): 53–69.
34.
SokolowAlvin D.. 1998. The changing property tax and state-local relations. Publius28, no. 1 (Winter): 165–87.
35.
StonecashJeffrey M.1998. The politics of state-local fiscal relations. In Governing partners: State-local relations in the United States.HansonRussell L., ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
36.
ToddBarbara. 1991. Counties in the federal system: The state connection. Intergovernmental Perspective17, no. 1 (Winter): 21–25.
37.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1972. Profile of county government. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
38.
ToddBarbara. 1995. Tax and expenditure limits on local governments. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.
39.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1993. State and local finances: Some jurisdictions confronted by short- and long-term problems. GAO/HRD-94–1. Washington, D.C.: GAO (October).
40.
WaltersJonathan. 1996. Cry, the beleaguered county. Governing (August): 31–37.