Regional Science,Regional Scientists,and Policy

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anas, A. 1994. Comment (on Bailly and Coffey). Papers in Regional Science 73, 1: 29-31.

Bailly, A. , and W. Coffey . 1994. Regional science in crisis: A plea for a more relevant and open approach. Papers in Regional Science 73, 1: 3-14.

Bolton, R. , and R. Jensen . 1995. Regional science and regional practice. International Regional Science Review 18, 2: 133-145.

Fujita, M. 1989. Urban economic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gibson, L. 1994. Fixing the fix we're in. Papers in Regional Science 73, 1: 15-18.

Huntoon, L. 1995. Can regional science find its place in the policy arena? International Regional Science Review 18, 2: 233-236.

Isserman, A. 1993. Lost in space? On the history, status, and future of regional science. Review of Regional Studies 23, 1: 1-50.

Isserman, A. M. 1995. The history, status, and future of regional science: An American perspective. International Regional Science Review 17, 3: 249-296.

Krugman, P. 1993. First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location. Journal of Regional Science 33, 2: 129-144.

10.

Plane, D. 1994. On discipline and disciplines in regional science. Papers in Regional Science 73, 1:19-23.

11.

Premer, M. , and U. Walz . 1994. Divergent regional development, factor mobility, and nontraded goods. Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, 6: 707-722.