The Location-Allocation versus Functional Integration Debate: An Assessment in Terms of Linkage Effects

Abstract

The Belsky-Karaska critique of the functional integration approach to development maintains that its urban functions orientation to planning was originally designed for descriptive, not prescriptive, purposes and that functional integration neglects demand. These objections are examined in the contexts of the balanced versus unbalanced growth controversy and the hierarchical diffusion of innovation paradigm. Functional integration adopts a more developmental approach than does the application of location-allocation models, which nonetheless have value in their own right. The major goal of functional integration should be to induce linkage effects that will have beneficial, if not readily predictable, social and economic consequences. The relevance of functional integration would be enhanced by giving more attention to the economics of linkage effects, including the processes by which direct investment in agriculture induces urban functions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker, C. M. , and A. R. Morrison . 1988. The determinants of urban population growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change 36: 270-280.

Belsky, E. S. , and G. J. Karaska . 1990. Approaches to locating urban function in developing rural areas. International Regional Science Review 13: 225-240.

Berry, B. J. L. 1972. Hierarchical diffusion: The basis of developmental filtering and spread in a system of growth centers. In Growth centers in regional economic development, ed. N. Hansen . New York: The Free Press.

Berry, B. J. L. 1973. Growth centers in the American urban system. Cambridge: Ballinger.

Farnsworth, C. W. 1988. The world debates how to trade a food supply in jeopardy. New York Times, December 11, p.1.

Hansen, N. 1982. The role of small and intermediate cities in national development processes and strategies. In Small cities and national development, ed. O. P. Mathur . Nagoya: United Nations Center for Regional Development.

Hansen, N. 1988. Small and medium size cities in development. In Regional economic development, eds. B. Higgins and D. J. Savoie . Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hirschman, A. O. 1987. Linkages. In The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics, Vol. 3, eds. J. Eatwell , M. Milgate , and P. Newman . New York: Stockton Press.

10.

Jacobs, J. 1985. Cities and the wealth of nations. New York: Random House Vintage Books.

11.

Johnson, E. A. J. 1970. The organization of space in developing countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

12.

Jones, E. L. 1981. The European miracle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Myrdal, G. 1957. Rich Lands and poor. New York: Harper and Brothers.

14.

Nurkse, R. 1953. Problems of capital formation in the underdeveloped economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Rietveld, P. 1990. Infrastructure planning and rural development: Reflections on the urban functions approach. International Regional Science Review 13: 249-255.

16.

Rondinelli, D. A. 1983a. Development projects as policy experiments. New York: Methuen.

17.

Rondinelli, D. A. 1983b. Secondary cities in developing countries. Beverly Hills: Sage.

18.

Rondinelli, D. A. 1985. Applied methods of regional analysis: The spatial dimensions of regional policy. Boulder: Westview Press.

19.

Rondinelli, D. A. 1990a. Location planning and regional economic development: Appropriate methods in developing countries. International Regional Science Review 13: 241-248.

20.

Rondinelli, D. A. 1990b. Policies for balanced urban development in Asia: Concepts and reality. Regional Development Dialogue 11: 23-51.

21.

Rondinelli, D. A. , and K. Ruddle . 1978. Urbanization and rural development. New York: Praeger.

22.

Rosenstein-Rodan, P. M. 1943. Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Economic Journal 53: 202-211.