The Chinese reforms are assessed on the basis of theoretical considerations and East European experience. The probable characteristics of a successful comprehensive reform are presented. The Chinese reform does not appear any closer to this ideal type than previous socialist reforms. In essence, no reform can work if it is not concerned with fundamental resource allocation and interrelation between economic activities and the political sphere. Without such a comprehensive approach, the reformed sectors are incompatible with other sectors which can limit the success of the reforms and may lead to the emergence of new problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baum,J.1987. How to succeed in China—with a bit of (capitalist) style. The Christian Science Monitor, April 28, p. 1, 36.
2.
Flaherty, D.1984. Regional policy and the reform of central planning: An assessment of the GDR, Hungarian, and Yugoslav approaches. Contributions to Political Economy3: 39-63.
3.
Graaff, J. de V.1963. Theoretical welfare economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Griffin, K.
, ed. 1984. Institutional reform and economic development in the Chinese countryside. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
5.
Jackson, S.1986. Reform of state enterprise management in China. The China Quarterly107: 405-432.
6.
Johnson, D. G.1982. Progress of economic reform in the People's Republic of China. Washington, D.C. and London: American Enterprise Institute.
7.
Kornai, J.1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam and New York: North Holland.
8.
Lai, C-F.1985. Special economic zones: The Chinese road to socialism?Environment and Planning D: Society and Space3: 63-84.
9.
Lee, P. N.1986. Enterprise autonomy in post-Mao China: A case study of policy-making, 1978-83. The China Quarterly105: 45-71.
10.
Lyons, T. P.1986. Explaining economic fragmentation in China: A systems approach. Journal of Comparative Economics10, 3: 209-236.
11.
Lyons, T. P.1987. Spatial aspects of development in China: The motor vehicle industry, 1956-1985. International Regional Science Review11, 1: 75-96.
12.
Pannel, C. W.1987. Economic reforms and readjustment in the People's Republic of China, and some geographic consequences. Studies in Comparative International Development (forthcoming).
13.
Prybyla, J. S.1986. China's economic experiment: From Mao to market. Problems of Communism35: 21-38.
14.
Pye, L. W.1986. On Chinese pragmatism in the 1980s. The China Quarterly106: 207-234.
15.
Rothenberg, J.1987. Space, interregional economic relations, and structural reform in China. International Regional Science Review11, 1: 5-22.
16.
Solinger, D. J.1987. Uncertain paternalism: Tensions in recent regional restructuring in China. International Regional Science Review11, 1: 23-42.
17.
Tardos, M.1986. The conditions of developing a regulated market. Acta Oeconomica36: 67-89.
18.
U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee
. 1986. China's economy looks toward the year 2000, volume 1: The four modernizations. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
19.
Walder, A. G.1987. Wage reform and the web of factory interests. The China Quarterly109: 22-41.
20.
Wong, C. P. W.1986. The economics of shortage and problems of reforms in Chinese industry. Journal of Comparative Economics10, 4: 363-384.
21.
Zweig, D.1987. From village to city: Reforming urban-rural relations in China. International Regional Science Review11, 1: 43-58.
