This paper focuses attention on the concept of accuracy in regional input-output tables. Two interpretations of accuracy, namely partitive and holistic accuracy, are discussed with reference to interpretation of input-output tables. Implications are drawn from recent contributions to the regional input-output literature in terms of the `reconciliation' debate and the survey versus non-survey debate. Holistic accuracy is the only concept which is tenable in practice; some suggested criteria for holistic accuracy are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borque, P. J.
, Chamber, E. J., Chiu, J. S., Denman, F. L., Dowdle, B., Gordon, G., Thomas, M., Tiebout, C., and Weeks, E.1967. The Washington economy: an input-output study. Seattle: Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Washington.
2.
Bullard, C. W.1976. Uncertainty in the 1967 U.S. input-output data, Urbana-Champaign: Centre for Advanced Computation, University of Illinois, Document No. 191.
3.
Conway, R. S.1975. The stability of regional interindustry models. Journal of Regional Science15, 1: 67-72.
4.
Conway, R. S.1977. The stability of regional input-output multipliers. Environment and Planning A9, 2: 197-214.
5.
Edwards, G. C.
1977. An input-output model of the Tasmanian economy. Proceedings of the Input-Output Workshop of the Second Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Section of the Regional Science Association.
6.
Evans, W. D.1954. The effects of structural matrix errors on interindustry relations estimates. Econometrica22, 4: 461-480.
7.
Freiberger, W. F.
ed. 1960. The International Dictionary of Applied Mathematics. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
8.
Gerking, S. D.1967a. Input-output as a simple econometric model. Review of Economics and Statistics58, 3: 274-282.
9.
Gerking, S. D.1976b. Reconciling `rows only' and `columns only' coefficients in an input-output model. International Regional Science Review1, 2: 30-46.
10.
Gerking, S. D.1979. Reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input-output analysis. International Regional Science Review4, 1: 23-36.
11.
Isard, W.
and Langford, T. W.1971. Regional input-output study: recollections, reflections and diverse notes on the Philadelphia experience. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
12.
Jensen, R. C.1978. Some accounting procedures and their effects on input-output multipliers. Annals of Regional Science12, 3: 21-38.
13.
Jensen, R. C.
, Mandeville, T. D., and Karunaratne, N. D.1979. Regional economic planning: generation of regional input-output analysis. London: Croom Helm.
14.
Jensen, R. C.
and McGaurr, D.1976. Reconciliation of purchases and sales estimates in an input-output table. Urban Studies13, 1: 59-65.
15.
Jensen, R. C.
and McGaurr, D.1977. Reconciliation techniques in input-output analysis: some comparisons and implications. Urban Studies14, 3: 327-338.
16.
Jensen, R. C.
and West, G. R.1980. The effect of relative coefficient size on input-output multipliers. Environment and Planning A12, 6: 659-670.
17.
Miernyk, W. H.
, Shellhammer, K. L., Brown, D. M., Coccari, R. L., Gallagher, C. J., and Wineman, W. H.1970. Simulating regional economic development. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath & Company.
18.
Miernyk, W. H.1976. Comments on recent developments in regional input-output analysis. International Regional Science Review1, 2: 47-55.
19.
Morgenstern, O.1963. On the accuracy of economic observations (Second Edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
Schultz, W. M.1978. On accuracy and precision in statistical estimates. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics26, 1: 15-26.
21.
Smith, P.
and Morrison, W. I.1974. Simulating the urban economy. London: Pion.
