Understanding how regional cooperation shapes urban land use efficiency is essential for promoting sustainable development of urban agglomeration. Existing literature mainly focuses on the direct impact of regional economic cooperation on urban land use efficiency while overlooking the indirect effects transmitted through intercity network structures. This study investigates the effects of regional economic cooperation network on urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration between 2010 and 2019. Utilizing a modified gravity model to quantify regional economic cooperation networks and a Slack-Based Measure method to evaluate urban land use efficiency, we reveal a significant and positive influence of regional economic cooperation networks on land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta. The findings suggest that cities leveraging economic interconnectivity networks not only enhance their land-use efficiency but also benefit from network spillover effects. These insights provide valuable implications for policymakers and urban designers seeking to promote economic development while ensuring the sustainable use of urban land resources.
AlonsoW.1964. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press.
2.
AnguelovskiI.ShiL.ChuE., et al.2016. “Equity Impacts of Urban Land Use Planning for Climate Adaptation: Critical Perspectives from the Global North and South.” Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (3): 333–48.
3.
ArfanuzzamanM.DahiyaB.. 2019. “Sustainable Urbanization in Southeast Asia and Beyond: Challenges of Population Growth, Land Use Change, and Environmental Health.” Growth and Change50 (2): 725–44.
4.
BattenD. F.1995. “Network Cities: Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century.” Urban Studies32 (2): 313–27.
5.
BerryB. J.1964. “Cities as Systems Within Systems of Cities.” Papers - Regional Science Association13 (1): 147–63.
6.
BoarnetM. G.1998. “Spillovers and the Locational Effects of Public Infrastructure.” Journal of Regional Science38 (3): 381–400.
7.
BoixR.TrullénJ.. 2007. “Knowledge, Networks of Cities and Growth in Regional Urban Systems.” Papers in Regional Science86 (4): 551–74.
8.
BroersmaL.OosterhavenJ.. 2009. “Regional Labor Productivity in the Netherlands: Evidence of Agglomeration and Congestion Effects.” Journal of Regional Science49 (3): 483–511.
9.
BurgerM. J.MeijersE. J.. 2016. Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities, Vol. 5–15. Wiley Online Library.
10.
CamagniR. P.SaloneC.. 1993. “Network Urban Structures in Northern Italy: Elements for a Theoretical Framework.” Urban Studies30 (6): 1053–64.
11.
CapelloR.2000. “The City Network Paradigm: Measuring Urban Network Externalities.” Urban Studies37 (11): 1925–45.
12.
CastellsM.2011. The Rise of the Network Society. John Wiley & Sons.
13.
CerveroR.2013. “Linking Urban Transport and Land Use in Developing Countries.” Journal of transport and land use6 (1): 7–24.
14.
ChenZ.SchintlerL. A.. 2023. “Rediscovering Regional Science: Positioning the Field’s Evolving Location in Science and Society.” Journal of Regional Science63 (3): 617–42.
15.
ChristallerW.1966. Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice-Hall.
16.
DeiningerK.ByerleeD.. 2012. “The Rise of Large Farms in Land Abundant Countries: Do They Have a Future?” World Development40 (4): 701–14.
17.
DengX.HuangJ.RozelleS.UchidaE.. 2010. “Economic Growth and the Expansion of Urban L and in China.” Urban Studies47 (4): 813–43.
18.
DerudderB.TaylorP.. 2005. “The Cliquishness of World Cities.” Global Networks5 (1): 71–91.
19.
DurantonG.OvermanH. G.. 2005. “Testing for Localization Using Micro-geographic Data.” The Review of Economic Studies72 (4): 1077–106.
20.
EhrlichM. V.HilberC. A.SchöniO.. 2018. “Institutional Settings and Urban Sprawl: Evidence from Europe.” Journal of Housing Economics42: 4–18.
FekadeW.2000. “Deficits of Formal Urban L and Management and Informal Responses Under Rapid Urban Growth, An International Perspective.” Habitat International24 (2): 127–50.
23.
FuH.WangY.MaoL., et al.2022. “The Spatial Pattern and Governance of Zhongyuan Urban-rural System in Its Development Trajectory.” Journal of Geographical Sciences32 (7): 1261–80.
24.
FujitaM.KrugmanP. R.VenablesA.. 2001. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. MIT Press.
25.
GaoX.ZhangA.SunZ.. 2020. “How Regional Economic Integration Influence on Urban Land Use Efficiency? A Case Study of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China.” Land Use Policy90: 104329.
26.
GaoD.LiG.LiY.. 2022. “Government Cooperation, Market Integration, and Energy Efficiency in Urban Agglomerations—based on the Quasi-natural Experiment of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Economic Coordination Committee.” Energy & Environment33 (8): 1679–94.
27.
GennaioM.-P.HerspergerA. M.BürgiM.. 2009. “Containing Urban Sprawl—evaluating Effectiveness of Urban Growth Boundaries Set by the Swiss Land Use Plan.” Land Use Policy26 (2): 224–32.
28.
HasanS.FaggianA.KlaiberH. A.SheldonI.. 2018. “Agglomeration Economies or Selection? An Analysis of Taiwanese Science Parks.” International Regional Science Review41 (3): 335–63.
29.
HongJ.ChuZ.WangQ.. 2011. “Transport Infrastructure and Regional Economic Growth: Evidence from China.” Transportation38: 737–52.
30.
HuangX.ShiX.. 2025. “Functional Division of Urban Agglomerations and Regional Coordinated Development: an Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of Urban Agglomerations in China.” The Annals of Regional Science74 (3): 70.
31.
HuangZ.DuX.CastilloC. S. Z.. 2019. “How Does Urbanization Affect Farmland Protection? Evidence from China.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling145: 139–47.
IsardW.1956. Location and Space-economy: A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. MIT Press.
34.
KeS.2015. “Domestic Market Integration and Regional Economic Growth—China’s Recent Experience from 1995-2011.” World Development66: 588–97.
35.
KuangW.LiuJ.DongJ.ChiW.ZhangC.. 2016. “The Rapid and Massive Urban and Industrial Land Expansions in China Between 1990 and 2010: a CLUD-based Analysis of Their Trajectories, Patterns, and Drivers.” Landscape and Urban Planning145: 21–33.
36.
LeSageJ.PaceR. K.. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
37.
LiY.WuF.HayI.. 2015. “City-Region Integration Policies and Their Incongruous Outcomes: the Case of Shantou-Chaozhou-Jieyang City-region in East Guangdong Province, China.” Habitat International46: 214–22.
38.
LiuY.2018. “Introduction to Land Use and Rural Sustainability in China.” Land Use Policy74: 1–4.
39.
MaleckiE. J.2002. “The Economic Geography of the Internet’s Infrastructure.” Economic Geography78 (4): 399–424.
40.
MeijersE.2005. “Polycentric Urban Regions and the Quest for Synergy: Is a Network of Cities More than the Sum of the Parts?” Urban Studies42 (4): 765–81.
41.
MillwardH.2006. “Urban Containment Strategies: a case-study Appraisal of Plans and Policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian Cities.” Land Use Policy23 (4): 473–85.
42.
OsmanT.2020. “Restrictive Land Use Regulations and Economic Performance.” International Regional Science Review43 (4): 291–315.
43.
PanH.DealB.ChenY.HewingsG.. 2018. “A Reassessment of Urban Structure and Land-use Patterns: Distance to CBD or Network-based? Evidence from Chicago.” Regional Science and Urban Economics70: 215–28.
44.
PugaD.2010. “The Magnitude and Causes of Agglomeration Economies.” Journal of Regional Science50 (1): 203–19.
45.
Rodríguez-PoseA.CrescenziR.. 2008. “Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe.” Regional Studies42 (1): 51–67.
46.
StevensB. H.1980. “A Theoretical Review of Location Theory and Its Relevance to Interregional Input–output Analysis.” International Regional Science Review5 (1): 15–30.
47.
Von ThünenJ. H.1966. The Isolated State. Pergamon Press.
48.
WangZ.FuH.LiuH.LiaoC.. 2023. “Urban Development Sustainability, Industrial Structure Adjustment, and Land Use Efficiency in China.” Sustainable Cities and Society89: 104338.
49.
WeberA. 1929. Theory of the Location of Industries. University of Chicago Press.
50.
WenL.ChatalovaL.GaoX.ZhangA.. 2021. “Reduction of Carbon Emissions Through Resource-saving and Environment-friendly Regional Economic Integration: Evidence from Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change166: 120590.
51.
XieR.YaoS.HanF.FangJ.. 2019. “Land Finance, Producer Services Agglomeration, and Green Total Factor Productivity.” International Regional Science Review42 (5-6): 550–79.
52.
YuA. T. W.WuY.ShenJ.ZhangX.ShenL.ShanL.. 2015. “The Key Causes of urban-rural Conflict in China.” Habitat International49: 65–73.
53.
ZhangW.WangM. Y.. 2018. “Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Determinants of Land Urbanization Quality in China: Evidence from 285 prefecture-level Cities.” Sustainable Cities and Society38: 70–79.
54.
ZhangX.ChenJ.TanM.SunY.. 2007. “Assessing the Impact of Urban Sprawl on Soil Resources of Nanjing City Using Satellite Images and Digital Soil Databases.” Catena69 (1): 16–30.
55.
ZhangX.WuY.ShenL.. 2011. “An Evaluation Framework for the Sustainability of Urban Land Use: a Study of Capital Cities and Municipalities in China.” Habitat International35 (1): 141–49.
56.
ZhangW.WangB.WangJ.WuQ.WeiY. D.. 2022. “How Does Industrial Agglomeration Affect Urban Land Use Efficiency? A Spatial Analysis of Chinese Cities.” Land Use Policy119: 106178.
57.
ZhaoJ.ZhuD.ChengJ.JiangX.LunF.ZhangQ.. 2021. “Does Regional Economic Integration Promote Urban Land Use Efficiency? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China.” Habitat International116: 102404.
