The literature offers different definitions of development traps, which largely depend on the conceptual frameworks and the methodologies used. Instead of looking at this phenomenon from the reductionist side of relative income, GDP or economic growth, this paper aims to revisit the link between economic development and structural change, proposing a structural (change) approach to development traps. From this perspective, we define regional development traps as the inability of some regions to evolve and transform their productive structures along four dimensions (productivity, technological intensity, value added and diversity), thus remaining stuck at different levels of the regional development ladder. Based on employment data for the main 85 labor market areas in Argentina between 1996 and 2019, we propose two alternative and intuitive ways to identify regional development traps following the development ladder metaphor. The results reveal that several Argentine regions are trapped at low and intermediate steps of the development ladder, while others show regressive (or favorable) trajectories towards (or away from) these levels. Finally, we verify the relationship between regional development traps and movements along the ladder and different performance indicators.
AbelesM.AmarA.. 2017. “La industria manufacturera argentina y su encrucijada.” In Manufactura y cambio estructural: aportes para pensar la política industrial en la Argentina, edited by AbelesM.CimoliM.LavarelloP.. ECLAC.
2.
AbelesM.VillafañeS.. 2022. Asimetrías y desigualdades territoriales en la Argentina: aportes para el debate. ECLAC.
3.
AboalD.ArzaV.RoviraF.. 2017. “Technological Content of Exports.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology26 (7): 661-82.
4.
AtkinD.CostinotA.FukuiM.. 2021. “Globalization and the Ladder of Development: Pushed to the Top or Held at the Bottom?” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16741. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4026582
5.
AzariadisC.StachurskiJ.. 2005. “Poverty Traps.” In Handbook of Economic Growth - Volume 2, edited by AghionP.DurlaufS.. North Holland.
6.
BallandP. A.BoschmaR.. 2024. “An Evolutionary Approach to Regional Development Traps in European Regions.” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 24–20. Utrecht University.
7.
BallandP. A.BoschmaR.CrespoJ.RigbyD.. 2019. “Smart Specialization Policy in the European union: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification.” Regional Studies53 (9): 1252–68.
8.
BarlettaF.YoguelG.. 2017. “De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de política industrial?” In Manufactura y cambio estructural: aportes para pensar la política industrial en la Argentina, edited by AbelesM.CimoliM.LavarelloP.. ECLAC.
9.
BarlettaF.FiorentinF.SuárezD.. 2022. “Diversificación productiva en contextos de heterogeneidad estructural: evidencia para el caso argentino.” In Anales de la 27° Reunión Anual Red Pymes Mercosur, edited by RoitterS.FedericoJ.. Asociación Civil Red Pymes Mercosur.
10.
BénassyJ. P.BrezisE. S.. 2013. “Brain Drain and Development Traps.” Journal of Development Economics102: 15–22.
11.
BernatG.2020. Contenido tecnológico de las exportaciones argentinas: ¿contiene más I+D+i un dólar de soja que un dólar de autos?Technical Report No. 13. CIECTI.
12.
BianchiC.IsabellaF.MartinisA.PicassoS.. 2024. “Varieties of Middle-Income Trap: Heterogeneous Trajectories and Common Determinants.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics71: 320–36.
13.
BlancoA.Díaz de AstarloaB.DrenikA.MoserC.TrupkinD.. 2022. “The Evolution of the Earnings Distribution in a Volatile Economy: Evidence from Argentina.” Quantitative Economics13 (4): 1361–1403.
14.
BlažekJ.KvětoňV.Baumgartinger-SeiringerS.TripplM.. 2020. “The Dark Side of Regional Industrial Path Development: towards a Typology of Trajectories of Decline.” European Planning Studies28 (8): 1455–73.
15.
BorelloJ.2002. Áreas económicas locales: criterios para su definición en la Argentina. Informe del Proyecto sobre Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas Industriales en América Latina (ITA/99/145). ECLAC.
16.
BorelloJ.GonzálezL.. 2021. Distribución geográfica de la actividad económica en la Argentina: revisión bibliográfica y perspectivas. ECLAC.
17.
BoschmaR.2021. “The Geographical Dimension of Structural Change.” In New Perspectives on Structural Change: Causes and Consequences of Structural Change in the Global Economy, edited by Foster-McGregorA.AlcortaL.SzirmaiN.VerspagenB.. Oxford University Press.
18.
BourdinS.TaiJ.. 2022. “Abstentionist Voting–Between Disengagement and Protestation in Neglected Areas: A Spatial Analysis of the Paris metropolis.” International Regional Science Review45 (3): 263-92.
19.
Bustillo CarrascoR.2019. Cambio estructural y patrón de crecimiento peruano (2001-2012): análisis desde un enfoque de economía regional. PhD Thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
20.
CalignanoG.NilsenT.Jørgensen NordliA.HaugeA.. 2024. “Beyond ‘periphery’: A Detailed and Nuanced Taxonomy of the Norwegian Regions.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography106 (1): 49-73.
21.
CaoH.VacaJ.. 2006. “Desarrollo regional en la Argentina: la centenaria vigencia de un patrón de asimetría territorial.” EURE32 (95): 95-111.
22.
CassiniL.RobertV.. 2017. “Oportunidad versus complejidad en los procesos de aprendizaje: criterios para clasificación de sectores según los atributos de los regímenes sectoriales de innovación.” In: La Encuesta Nacional de Dinámica de Empleo e Innovación (ENDEI) como herramienta de análisis: La innovación y el empleo en la industria manufacturera argentina, edited by ECLAC. ECLAC.
23.
CEP. 2007. Contenido tecnológico de las exportaciones argentinas 1996-2007. Tendencias de upgrading intersectorial. Centro de Estudios para la Producción (CEP).
24.
ChenT.2024. Regional Development Traps in China. MSc Thesis on Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Università degli studi di Padova.
25.
Çınarİ. T.2023a. “Regional Development Trap and Economic Complexity in Turkey: Evidence from Provincial Data.” Regional Science Policy & Practice15 (9): 2224-52.
26.
Çınarİ. T.2023b. “Regional Development Trap in Turkey: Can Relatedness Find a Way Out?” Papers in Regional Science102 (4): 817-50.
27.
CoatzD.García DíazF.PortaF.SchteingartD.. 2018. “Incentivos y trayectorias de cambio estructural.” In Ensayos sobre desarrollo sostenible. La dimensión económica de la Agenda 2030 en la Argentina, edited by MercadoR.. UNDP.
28.
DiemerA.IammarinoS.Rodríguez-PoseA.StorperM.. 2022. “The Regional Development Trap in Europe.” Economic Geography98 (5): 487-509.
29.
ECLAC. 2012. Structural Change for Equality: An Integrated Approach to Development. ECLAC.
30.
ECLAC. 2024. Development Traps in Latin America and the Caribbean: Vital Transformations and How to Manage Them. ECLAC.
31.
EderJ.2019. “Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda.” International Regional Science Review42 (2): 119-46.
32.
EichengreenB.ParkD.ShinK.. 2014. “Growth Slowdowns Redux.” Japan and the World Economy32: 65-84.
33.
European Commission. 2024a. Forging a Sustainable Future Together: Cohesion for a Competitive and Inclusive Europe. Report of the High-Level Group on the Future of Cohesion Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
34.
European Commission. 2024b. Ninth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Luxembourg: European Union.
FanZ.AnwarS.. 2021. “International Migration of Entrepreneurs and the Emergence of Economic Development Traps.” Review of Development Economics25 (1): 6–22.
37.
FelipeJ.AbdonA.KumarU.. 2012. Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What Is it, Who Is in it, and Why?Working Paper No. 715. Levy Economics Institute.
38.
Fernández BugnaC.PeiranoF.. 2011. “Cambio Estructural. Cinco Enfoques Estilizados.” Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Segunda Época19: 95–114.
39.
Foster-McGregorA.AlcortaL.SzirmaiN.VerspagenB., eds. 2021. New Perspectives on Structural Change: Causes and Consequences of Structural Change in the Global Economy. Oxford University Press.
40.
GillI.KharasH.. 2007. An East Asian Renaissance. Ideas for Economic Growth. The World Bank.
41.
GlücklerJ.ShearmurR.MartinusK.. 2023. “Liability or Opportunity? Reconceptualizing the Periphery and its Role in Innovation.” Journal of Economic Geography23 (1): 231–49.
42.
HartmannD.PinheiroF.. 2022. “Economic Complexity and Inequality at the National and Regional Level. To Appear.” In Handbook of Complexity Economics, edited by ChenP.ElsnerW.PykaA.. Routledge. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.00818
43.
HartmannD.BezerraM.LodoloB.PinheiroF.. 2020. “International Trade, Development Traps, and the Core-Periphery Structure of Income Inequality.” EconomiA21 (2): 255–78.
44.
HertrichT.BrennerT.. 2023. “Classification of Regions According to the Dominant Innovation Barriers: The Characteristics and Stability of Region Types in Germany.” Regional Science Policy & Practice15 (9): 2182–2223.
45.
HicksD.2011. “Structural Change and Industrial Classification.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics22 (2): 93–105.
46.
IammarinoS.Rodríguez-PoseA.StorperM.. 2019. “Regional Inequality in Europe: Evidence, Theory and Policy Implications.” Journal of Economic Geography19 (2): 273–98.
47.
IammarinoS.Rodríguez-PoseA.StorperM.DiemerA.. 2020. Falling into the Middle-Income Trap? A Study on the Risks for EU Regions to Be Caught in a Middle-Income Trap. Report Contract No. 2018CE16BAT055. Brussels: European Commission.
48.
JankowskaA.NagengastA.PereaJ. R.. 2012. “The Product Space and the Middle-Income Trap: Comparing Asian and Latin American Experiences.” OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 311. Paris: OECD.
49.
KataishiR.MoreroH.. 2020. “Taxonomías, oportunidades tecnológicas y cadenas globales de valor en países en vías de desarrollo: una sistematización conceptual y una propuesta de abordaje.” Investigación y Desarrollo28 (2): 168–220.
50.
KatzJ.BernatG.. 2011. “Exit–entry, Productivity Growth and Structural Change in Response to Changes in Macroeconomic Policy: Evidence from Argentina.” Innovation and Development1 (2): 227–44.
51.
KatzJ.StumpoG.. 2001. “Sectoral Regimes, Productivity and International Competitiveness.” CEPAL Review75: 131–52.
52.
KharasH.KohliH.. 2011. “What Is the Middle Income Trap, Why Do Countries Fall into it, and How Can it Be Avoided?” Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies3 (3): 281–89.
53.
Krieger-BodenC.Traistaru-SiedschlagI.. 2008. “Regional Structural Change and Cohesion in the Enlarged European Union: An Introduction.” In The Impact of European Integration on Regional Structural Change and Cohesion, edited by Krieger-BodenC.MorgenrothE.PetrakosG.. Routledge.
54.
KrügerJ.2008. “Productivity and Structural Change: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys22 (2): 330–63.
55.
LavopaA.2015. Structural Transformation and Economic Development: Can Development Traps Be Avoided?Doctoral Thesis. Maastricht University.
56.
LavopaA.SzirmaiA.. 2018. “Structural Modernisation and Development Traps. An Empirical Approach.” World Development112: 59–73.
57.
Le Petit-GuerinM.VelthuisS.RoyerJ.Cauchi-DuvalN.FranklinR.LeibertT.MacKinnonD.PikeA.. 2023. “Lost in Transition? Trajectories of Regional ‘left-Behindness’ in the EU15 from 1982 to 2017.” Beyond Left behind Places Project Working Paper 04/23. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS). Newcastle University.
58.
LeeK.2013. Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-Up: Knowledge, Path-Creation, and the Middle-Income Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
LiH.HaynesK. E.. 2011. “Economic Structure and Regional Disparity in China: Beyond the Kuznets Transition.” International Regional Science Review34 (2): 157–90.
60.
LiY.RigbyD.. 2023. “Relatedness, Complexity, and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities.” International Regional Science Review46 (1): 3–37.
61.
LópezA.NiembroA.RamosD.. 2014. “Latin America’s Competitive Position in Knowledge-Intensive Services Trade.” CEPAL Review113: 21–39.
62.
MacKinnonD.BéalV.LeibertT.. 2024. “Rethinking ‘left-Behind’ Places in a Context of Rising Spatial Inequalities and Political Discontent.” Regional Studies58 (6): 1161–66.
63.
MarinA.PetraliaS.. 2018. “Sources and Contexts of Inter-industry Differences in Technological Opportunities: the Cases of Argentina and Brazil.” Innovation and Development8 (1): 29–57.
64.
MartinsP.2015. “Sub-regional Perspectives on Structural Change.” In CREDIT Research Paper No. 15/03. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT). The University of Nottingham.
65.
MohapatraS.RozelleS.HuangJ.. 2006. “Climbing the Development Ladder: Economic Development and the Evolution of Occupations in Rural China.” The Journal of Development Studies42 (6): 1023–55.
66.
NardoM.SaisanaM.SaltelliA.TarantolaS.HoffmannA.GiovanniniE.. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD.
67.
NeffkeF.HartogM.BoschmaR.HenningM.. 2018. “Agents of Structural Change: The Role of Firms and Entrepreneurs in Regional Diversification.” Economic Geography94 (1): 23–48.
68.
NiembroA.CaláC. D.. 2021. “Approximating the Impact of COVID-19 on Regional Production in Countries with Scarce Subnational Data: A Proposal and Application for Argentina during the First Wave.” REGION8 (2): 167–86.
69.
NiembroA.CaláC. D.. 2024. “Regional Structural Change in Argentina (1996-2019): Concepts, Measurements and Unequal Trajectories over the Business Cycle.” Regional Science Policy & Practice16 (8): 100068.
70.
NiembroA.SarmientoJ.. 2021. “Regional Development Gaps in Argentina: A Multidimensional Approach to Identify the Location of Policy Priorities.” Regional Science Policy & Practice13 (4): 1297–1328.
71.
NiembroA.CaláC. D.BelmartinoA.. 2021. “Una tipología de las Áreas Económicas Locales de Argentina en base a perfiles sectoriales de coaglomeración territorial (20112018).” Investigaciones Regionales - Journal of Regional Research50: 169–203.
PinheiroF.BallandP. A.BoschmaR.HartmannD.. 2022. “The Dark Side of the Geography of Innovation: Relatedness, Complexity and Regional Inequality in Europe.” Regional Studies59 (1): 2106362.
81.
QueirozA. R.RomeroJ. P.FreitasE. E.. 2024. “Relatedness and Regional Economic Complexity: Good News for Some, Bad News for Others.” EconomiA25 (2): 264–88.
82.
RivasD.RobertV.. 2015. Cambio estructural y desarrollo. Eficiencia keynesiana y schumpeteriana en la industria manufacturera en la Argentina en el período 2003-2011. Serie Estudios y Perspectivas -Buenos Aires- No. 42. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.
83.
Rodríguez-PoseA.BartalucciF.DávalosM.Lozano-GraciaN.. 2024. “Overcoming Left-Behindedness: Moving beyond the Efficiency versus Equity Debate in Territorial Development.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 10734. Washington DC: World Bank.
84.
Rodríguez-PoseA.DijkstraL.PoelmanH.. 2024. “The Geography of EU Discontent and the Regional Development Trap.” Economic Geography100 (3): 213–45.
85.
RoesslerM.2024. “Untangling Regional Development Traps through Narratives.” Regional Studies, Regional Science11 (1): 406–18.
86.
RoitterS.ErbesA.KababeY.. 2013. “Desarrollo inclusivo en Argentina: Cambio estructural y empleo en las etapas de recuperación y crecimiento reciente.” In Hacia un desarrollo inclusivo: El caso de la Argentina, edited by InfanteR.GerstenfeldP.. ECLAC.
87.
SaviottiP. P.FrenkenK.. 2008. “Export Variety and the Economic Performance of Countries.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics18: 201–18.
88.
SaviottiP. P.PykaA.. 2004. “Economic Development by the Creation of New Sectors.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics14: 1–35.
89.
SilvaE. G.TeixeiraA. A.. 2008. “Surveying Structural Change: Seminal Contributions and a Bibliometric Account.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics19 (4): 273–300.
90.
StiglitzJ.SenA.FitoussiJ. P.. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. European Commission.
91.
SztulwarkS.2005. El estructuralismo latinoamericano: Fundamentos y transformaciones del pensamiento económico de la periferia. Prometeo.
92.
TimmerM.de VriesG.de VriesK.. 2016. “Patterns of Structural Change in Developing Countries.” In Routledge Handbook of Industry and Development, edited by WeissJ.TribeM.. Routledge.
93.
TsiotasD.TseliosV.. 2023. “Understanding Peripherality in a Multidimensional Geographical, Socioeconomic, and Institutional Context: Evidence from Greece.” Regional Science Policy & Practice15 (7): 1424–57.
94.
TylerP.EvenhuisE.MartinR.SunleyP.GardinerB.. 2017. “Growing Apart? Structural Transformation and the Uneven Development of British Cities.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society10 (3): 425–54.
UNIDO. 2013. Industrial Development Report 2013. Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. UNIDO.
98.
VelthuisS.RoyerJ.Le Petit-GuerinM.Cauchi-DuvalN.FranklinR.LeibertT.MacKinnonD.PikeA.. 2022. “Geographically Uneven Structural Change in EU15 Regions from 1980 to 2017: A Cluster Analysis.” Beyond Left behind Places Project Working Paper 01/22. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University.
99.
VelthuisS.RoyerJ.Le Petit-GuerinM.Cauchi-DuvalN.FranklinR.LeibertT.MacKinnonD.PikeA.. 2024. “Regional Varieties of ‘left-Behindness’ in the EU15.” Regional Studies, published online.
100.
WainerA.BelloniP.. 2019. “Exportaciones argentinas desde 1990 a la actualidad: Un crecimiento exportador sin cambio estructural.” Papeles de Trabajo13 (23): 173–90.
101.
YoguelG.2014. “¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de cambio estructural? Una perspectiva evolucionista-neoschumpeteriana.” Paper Presented at Seminario-Taller: La estructura productiva argentina - Evolución reciente y perspectivas. October 1–3, 2014. ECLAC, Buenos Aires Office.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
