We explore how the hub-and-spoke system in the international freight transportation network contributes to the global shrinkage of space. The friction in long-distance trade routes varies by the location of shippers and nodal characteristics of traversed ports, and is mitigated by the quality of scale economies driven by the hub-and-spoke distribution system along the trajectory of the logistic process. In order to confirm the shrinkage of space brought about by the hub-and-spoke shipping economies through transshipment routes via hub ports, we examine disaggregated cross-Atlantic cargo shipping trajectory data from Europe to the U.S. recorded both on landside and seaside with a discrete choice model. The results present that hub-and-spoke shipping economies arise with the scales of landside and maritime port operations and with shipping line diversity. Generally, they are found to offset distance friction that occurs along landside and maritime shipping voyages, but hub-and-spoke shipping economies arise differently depending on how hub-and-spoke configurations are set. They mainly stem from larger scale of ports’ operation and more diverse shipping lines serving the final port of export. The hub-and-spoke system is confirmed as a main driver of global shrinkage of space in terms of long-distance commercial activities.
BehrensK.GaignéC.OttavianoG. I. P.ThisseJ. F.2006. “Is Remoteness a Locational Disadvantage?” Journal of Economic Geography6 (3): 347––368.
2.
BergstrandJ. H.1985. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” The Review of Economics and Statistics67 (3): 474–481.
3.
BerthelonM.FreundC.2008. “On the Conservation of Distance in International Trade.” Journal of International Economics75 (2): 310–320.
4.
BlaineyG.1966. The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia’s History?Melbourne, Australia: Sun Books.
5.
BleaneyM.NeavesA. S.2013. “Declining Distance Effects in International Trade: Some Country-Level Evidence.” World Economy36 (8): 1029–1040.
6.
BrooksM. R.FrostJ. D.2004. “Short Sea Shipping: A Canadian Perspective.” Maritime Policy and Management31 (4): 393–407.
7.
BuchC. M.KleinertJ.ToubalF.2004. “The Distance Puzzle: On the Interpretation of the Distance Coefficient in Gravity Equations.” Economics Letters83 (3): 293–298.
8.
CairncrossF.1997. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publications.
9.
CarrèreC.SchiffM.2005. “On the Geography of Trade: Distance is Alive and Well.” Revue Économique56 (6): 1249–1274.
10.
Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University and Information Technology Outreach Services - ITOS - University of Georgia [CIESIN-ITOS]. 2013. Global roads open access data set, version 1 (gROADSv1). [online]. Available from: DOI: 10.7927/H4VD6WCT. Accessed 9 Jun 2020.
11.
CoeD. T.SubramanianA.TamirisaN. T. 2007. “The Missing Globalization Puzzle: Evidence of the Declining Importance of Distance.” IMF Staff Papers54 (1): 34–58.
12.
CoeD. T.SubramanianA.TamirisaN. T.BhavnaniR.2002. The missing globalization puzzle. No. No. 02/171.
13.
DeardorffA. V.1998. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In Regionalization of the world economy, edited by FrankelJ.A., 7–32. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
DisdierA.-C.HeadK.2008. “The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade.” Review of Economics and Statistics90 (1): 37–48.
15.
EldridgeJ. D.JonesJ. P.1991. “Warped space: A Geography of Distance Decay.” Professional Geographer43 (4): 500–511.
16.
FlemingD. K.HayuthY.1994. “Spatial Characteristics of Transportation Hubs: Centrality and Intermediacy.” Journal of Transport Geography2 (1): 3–18.
17.
ForerP.1978. “A Place for Plastic Space?” Progress in Human Geography2 (2): 230–267.
18.
FratianniM.MarchionneF.2012. “Trade Costs and Economic Development.” Economic Geography88 (2): 137–163.
19.
FujitaM.MoriT.1996. “The Role of Ports in the Making of Major Cities: Self-Agglomeration and Hub-Effect.” Journal of Development Economics49 (1): 93–120.
20.
FujitaM.MoriT.2005. “Transport Development and the Evolution of Economic Geography.” Portuguese Economic Journal4 (2): 129–156.
21.
GallegoN.LlanoC.de La MataT.DÍaz-LanchasJ.2015. “Intranational Home Bias in the Presence of Wholesalers, Hub-Spoke Structures and Multimodal Transport Deliveries.” Spatial Economic Analysis10 (3): 369–399.
22.
GanapatiS.WongW. F.ZivO.2021. Entrepot: Hubs, Scale, and Trade Costs. No. w29015.
23.
GatrellA. C.1983. Distance and Space: A Geographical Perpsective. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
24.
GlaeserE. L.KohlhaseJ. E.2004. “Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs.” In Fifty Years of Regional Science, edited by FloraxR. J. G. M.PlaneD. A., 197–228. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
25.
GuerreroD.GraslandC.DucruetC.2016. “Explaining International Trade Flows with Shipping-Based Distances.” In Maritime Networks: Spatial Structures and Time Dynamics, 302–320. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
26.
HallP. v.JacobsW.2010. “Shifting Proximities: The Maritime Ports Sector in an Era of Global Supply Chains.” Regional Studies44 (9): 1103–1115.
27.
HeadK.MayerT.2013. “What Separates Us? Sources of Resistance to Globalization.” Canadian Journal of Economics46 (4): 1196–1231.
28.
HesseM.2013. “Cities and Flows: Re-Asserting a Relationship as Fundamental as it is Delicate.” Journal of Transport Geography29:33–42.
29.
HesseM.RodrigueJ.-P.2004. “The Transport Geography of Logistics and Freight Distribution.” Journal of Transport Geography12 (3): 171–184.
30.
HummelsD.2007. “Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives21 (3): 131–154.
31.
HummelsD.SkibaA.2002. “A Virtuous Circle? Regional Tariff Liberalization and Scale Economies in Transport.” In Integrating the Americas: FTAA and Beyond, edited by Estevade-OrdalA.RodrikD.TaylorA. M.VelascoA.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
JanelleD. G.BeutheM.1997. “Globalization and Research Issues in Transportation.” Journal of Transport Geography5 (3): 199–206.
33.
KashihaM.DepkenC.ThillJ.-C.2016. “Border Effects in a Free-Trade Zone: Evidence from European Wine Shipments.” Journal of Economic Geography16 (6): 1–23.
34.
KnowlesR. D.2006. “Transport Shaping Space: Differential Collapse in Time-Space.” Journal of Transport Geography14:407–425.
35.
KrugmanP.1993. “The Hub Effect: Or, Threeness in Interregional Trade.” In The Policy and Dynamics in International Trade, edited by EthierW. J.HelpmanE.NearyJ. P., 29–37. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
36.
KubyM.ReidN.1992. “Technological Change and the Concentration of the U.S. General Cargo Port System: 1970-88.” Economic Geography68 (3): 272–289.
37.
LendleA.OlarreagaM.SchroppS.VézinaP. L.2016. “There Goes Gravity: Ebay and the Death of Distance.” Economic Journal126 (591): 406–441.
38.
MalchowM.KanafaniA.2001. “A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection.” Maritime Policy and Management28 (3): 265–277.
39.
MalchowM. B.KanafaniA.2004. “A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review40 (4): 317–337.
40.
McFaddenD.1978a. “Modeling the Choice of Residential Location.” Transportation Research Record673:72–77.
41.
McFaddenD.1978b. “Modelling the Choice of Residential Location.” In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, edited by KarlqvistA.LundqvistL.SnickarsF.WeibullJ. W., 75–96. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
42.
MoriT.2012. “Increasing Returns in Transportation and the Formation of Hubs.” Journal of Economic Geography12 (4): 877–897.
43.
MoriT.NishikimiK.2002. “Economies of Transport Density and Industrial Agglomeration.” Regional Science and Urban Economics32 (2): 167–200.
44.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 2000. Global Shipping Lane Network Dataset[online]. Available from:http://geocommons.com/datasets?id=25. Accessed 12 Jun 2020.
45.
O’KellyM. E.1998. “A Geographer’s Analysis of Hub-and-Spoke Networks.” Journal of Transport Geography6 (3): 171–186.
46.
O’KellyM. E.BryanD. L.1998. “Hub Location with Flow Economies of Scale.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological32 (8): 605–616.
47.
OrtúzarJ. de D.WillumsenL. G.2011. Modeling Transport. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
PlaneD. A.1984. “Migration Space: Doubly Constained Gravity Model Mapping of Relative Interstate Seperation.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers74 (2): 244–256.
49.
ReddingS. J.SturmD. M. 2008. “The Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification.” American Economic Review98 (5): 1766–1797.
50.
RietveldP.VickermanR.2004. “Transport in Regional Science: The ‘Death of Distance’ is Premature.” Papers in Regional Science83 (1): 229–248.
51.
RobertsonP. E.RobitailleM. C.2017. “The Tyranny of Distance and the Gravity Of Resources.” Economic Record93 (303): 533–549.
52.
RodrigueJ. P.AsharA.2016. “Transshipment Hubs in the New Panamax Era: The Role of the Caribbean.” Journal of Transport Geography51:270–279.
53.
RodrigueJ. P.NotteboomT.2010a. “Foreland-Based Regionalization: Integrating Intermediate Hubs with Port Hinterlands.” Research in Transportation Economics27 (1): 19–29.
54.
RodrigueJ. P.NotteboomT.2010b. “Comparative North American and European Gateway Logistics: The Regionalism of Freight Distribution.” Journal of Transport Geography18 (4): 497–507.
55.
StevenA. B.CorsiT. M.2012. “Choosing a Port: An Analysis of Containerized Imports into the US.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review48 (4): 881–895.
56.
ThillJ. C.1992. “Choice Set Formation for Destination Choice Modelling.” Progress in Human Geography16 (3): 361–382.
57.
ThillJ.-C.2011. “Is spatial really that special? A tale of spaces.” In Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems, edited by PopovichV. v.ClaramuntC.DevogeleT.SchrenkM.KorolenkoK., 3–12. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
58.
TillerK. C.ThillJ.-C.2015. “Spatial Patterns of Landside Trade Impedance in Containerized South American Exports.” Journal of Transport Geography58:272–285.
59.
ToblerW. R.1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography46:234–240.
60.
TrainK.2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
WangC.WangJ.2011. “Spatial Pattern of the Global Shipping Network and its Hub-and-Spoke System.” Research in Transportation Economics32 (1): 54–63.
62.
XuH.ItohH.2017. “Density Economies and Transport Geography: Evidence from the Container Shipping Industry.” Journal of Urban Economics105:121–132.
