Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) can generate important knowledge spillovers on local economies, fostering regional innovation, especially in developing countries. In this paper, we analyze how regional industrial structure shapes the effects of inward FDI spillovers on the innovative performance of Brazilian regions. Prior literature has analyzed the effects of FDI spillovers on the productivity of host countries’ firms, while less attention has been given to the corresponding effects on regional innovation. Thus, we use data on the investments of Multinational Companies in Brazilian regions for 2003-2014 and relate these data to the innovative performance measured by patents. Our results show that inward FDI positively influences innovation at the regional level since Brazilian regions that receive inward FDI present stronger innovative performance. In addition, the positive effects of inward FDI on local innovation are reinforced by the diversity of the regional industrial structure. Diversified regions that receive inward FDI are therefore better able to leverage the benefits of inward FDI spillovers.
AmendolagineVitoPresbiteroAndrea F.RabellottiRobertaSanfilippoMarco. 2019. “Local Sourcing in Developing Countries: The Role of Foreign Direct Investments and Global Value Chains.” World Development113, (January): 73‐88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.010.
2.
AraújoVeneziano de CastroGarciaRenato. 2019. “Determinants and Spatial Dependence of Innovation in Brazilian Regions: Evidence from a Spatial Tobit Model.” Nova Economia29 (2): 375‐400. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/4456.
3.
AscaniAndreaBallandPierre-AlexandreMorrisonAndrea. 2020. “Heterogeneous Foreign Direct Investment and Local Innovation in Italian Provinces.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics53, June: 388‐401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.06.004.
4.
AscaniAndreaGagliardiLuisa. 2020. “Asymmetric Spillover Effects from MNE Investment.” Journal of World Business55 (6): 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101146.
5.
AudretschDavid B.FeldmanMaryann P.. 1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review86 (3): 630‐640. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118216.
6.
BeaudryCatherineSchiffauerovaAndrea. 2009. “Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate.” Research Policy38 (2): 318‐337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010.
7.
CabralRenéAlvaradoJorge Alberto. 2020. “The Role of FDI on Exports Performance: Evidence from the Mexican States.” International Regional Science Review44 (December), 684‐708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620979641.
8.
CorsateaTeodora DianaJayetHubert. 2014. “Spatial Patterns of Innovation Activities in France: Market’s Role versus Public Research Efforts.” The Annals of Regional Science52 (3): 739‐762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0608-2.
9.
CrescenziRiccardoIammarinoSimona. 2017. “Global Investments and Regional Development Trajectories: The Missing Links.” Regional Studies51 (1): 97‐115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1262016.
10.
CrespoNunoFontouraMaria Paula. 2007. “Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers – What Do We Really Know?” World Development35 (3): 410‐425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.04.001.
11.
CuiLinXuYing. 2019. “Outward FDI and Profitability of Emerging Economy Firms: Diversifying from Home Resource Dependence in Early Stage Internationalization.” Journal of World Business54 (4): 372‐386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.002.
12.
FagerbergJanMartinSrholecVerspagenBart. 2010. “Innovation and Economic Development.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 2, 833‐872. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02004-6.
13.
FrenkenKoenFrank Van OortVerburgThijs. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth.” Regional Studies41 (5): 685‐697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296.
14.
FritschMichaelSlavtchevViktor. 2010. “How Does Industry Specialization Affect the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems?” Annals of Regional Science45 (1): 87‐108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0292-9.
15.
FuXiaolan. 2008. “Foreign Direct Investment, Absorptive Capacity and Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from China.” Oxford Development Studies36 (1): 89‐110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701848193.
GarcíaFranciscoJinByungchaeSalomonRobert. 2013. “Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Improve the Innovative Performance of Local Firms?” Research Policy42 (1): 231‐244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.005.
18.
GarciaRenatoAraujoVenezianoMascariniSuelene. 2013. “The Role of Geographic Proximity for University-Industry Linkages in Brazil: An Empirical Analysis.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies19 (3): 433‐456.
19.
GonçalvesEduardoMaria de MatosCirleneFernandes de AraújoInácio. 2019. “Path-Dependent Dynamics and Technological Spillovers in the Brazilian Regions.” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy12 (3): 605‐629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-018-9259-5.
20.
HesseKoljaFornahlDirk. 2020. “Essential Ingredients for Radical Innovations? The Role of (Un‐)Related Variety and External Linkages in Germany.”.Papers in Regional Science99 (5): 1165-1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12527.
21.
HighamKylede RassenfosseGaétanJaffeAdam B.. 2021. “Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement.” Research Policy50 (4): 104215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104215.
22.
HuangLingyunLiuXiamingXuLei. 2012. “Regional Innovation and Spillover Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Threshold Approach.” Regional Studies46 (5): 583‐596. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.520694.
23.
HuynhHien T. N.NguyenPhuong v.TrieuHoa D. X.TranKhoa T.. 2021. “Productivity Spillover from FDI to Domestic Firms across Six Regions in Vietnam.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade57 (1): 59‐75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1562892.
24.
KangDongwooDall’erbaSandy. 2016. “An Examination of the Role of Local and Distant Knowledge Spillovers on the US Regional Knowledge Creation.” International Regional Science Review39 (4): 355‐385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017615572888.
25.
KimMinjung. 2015. “Productivity Spillovers from FDI and the Role of Domestic Firm’s Absorptive Capacity in South Korean Manufacturing Industries.” Empirical Economics48 (2): 807‐827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0804-z.
26.
LeeKeunMalerbaFranco. 2017. “Catch-up Cycles and Changes in Industrial Leadership:Windows of Opportunity and Responses of Firms and Countries in the Evolution of Sectoral Systems.” Research Policy46 (2): 338‐351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006.
27.
LiZhengLiJunHeBin. 2018. “Does Foreign Direct Investment Enhance or Inhibit Regional Innovation Efficiency?” Chinese Management Studies12 (1): 35‐55. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-02-2017-0034.
28.
MascariniSueleneGarciaRenatoRoselinoJosé Eduardo. 2019. “Analysis of the Effect of Territorial Factors on Regional Innovation in the State of São Paulo, Brazil.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos (RBERU)13 (2): 183‐200.
29.
MiguelezErnestMorenoRosina. 2018. “Relatedness, External Linkages and Regional Innovation in Europe.” Regional Studies52 (5): 688‐701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478.
30.
MorallesHerick FernandoMorenoRosina. 2020. “FDI Productivity Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity in Brazilian Firms: A Threshold Regression Analysis.” International Review of Economics and Finance70 (July): 257‐272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.07.005.
31.
NingLutaoWangFanLiJian. 2016. “Urban Innovation, Regional Externalities of Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese Cities.” Research Policy45 (4): 830‐843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.014.
RojecMatijaKnellMark. 2018. “Why Is There A Lack Of Evidence On Knowledge Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment?” Journal of Economic Surveys32 (3): 579‐612. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12207.
34.
SongHuashengZhangMin. 2017. “Spatial Spillovers of Regional Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Provinces.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade53 (9): 2104‐2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1284061.
35.
SuziganWilsonGarciaRenatoFeitosaPaulo Henrique Assis. 2020. “Institutions and Industrial Policy in Brazil after Two Decades: Have We Built the Needed Institutions?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology29 (7): 799‐813. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1719629.
36.
UbedaFernandoPérez-HernándezFrancisco. 2017. “Absorptive Capacity and Geographical Distance Two Mediating Factors of FDI Spillovers: A Threshold Regression Analysis for Spanish Firms.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade17 (1): 1‐28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-016-0226-z.
37.
ValacchiGiuliaDoytchNadiaYonzanNishant. 2021. “Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investments on Patent Activity of Greenfield Multinationals.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change173 (December): 121168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121168.
38.
WangYuandiNingLutaoLiJianPrevezerMartha. 2016. “Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation in Chinese Regions: The Role of Regional Industrial Specialization and Diversity.” Regional Studies50 (5): 805‐822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.933800.
39.
ZhangXinyuYuJihai. 2018. “Spatial Weights Matrix Selection and Model Averaging for Spatial Autoregressive Models.” Journal of Econometrics203 (1): 1‐18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.05.021.
