The labor market effects of the recent financial and economic crisis are rather heterogeneous across countries and regions. Such differences in labor market performance among industrialized countries are an issue of ongoing research. The objective of this article is to analyze labor market disparities among European regions and to provide evidence on the factors behind these differences. Whereas previous research focused on the effects of national labor market institutions, we also take structural characteristics of regions into account and investigate differences in labor demand responsiveness and their potential determinants. The data set covers the Nomenclature des unités territoriales statistiques 2 regions in the EU15 for the period 1980 to 2008. We employ an error correction model that is combined with spatial residual correlation. Our findings point to substantially distinct wage and output elasticities of employment among European countries and regions. Moreover, the rate of adjustment to disequilibrium is subject to significant variation across units of observation. There is robust evidence that labor market institutions affect the adjustment speed of regional labor markets and the wage elasticity of employment. Moreover, the findings suggest that some characteristics of regional labor markets matter as well. However, corresponding results are less robust compared with the evidence on labor market institutions.
AddisonJ. T.TeixeiraP.. 2005. “Employment Adjustment in Two Countries with Poor Reputations: Analysis of Aggregate, Firm, and Flow Data for Portugal and Germany.” International Economics and Economic Policy1:329–48.
2.
AgellJ.1999. “On the Benefits from Rigid Labour Markets: Norms, Market Failures and Social Insurance.” Economic Journal109:F143–64.
3.
AnselinL.1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
4.
ArpaiaA.MourreG.. 2012. “Institutions and Performance in European Labour Markets: Taking a Fresh Look at Evidence.” Journal of Economic Surveys26:1–41.
5.
BaddeleyM.MartinR.TylerP.. 2000. “Regional Wage Rigidity: The European Union and United States Compared.” Journal of Regional Science40:115–42.
6.
BeanC. R.1994. “European Unemployment: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature32:573–619.
7.
BeenstockM.FelsensteinD.. 2010. “Spatial Error Correction and Cointegration in Nonstationary Panel Data: Regional House Prices in Israel.” Journal of Geographical Systems12:189–206.
8.
BertolaG.BlauF.KahnL.. 2002. “Comparative Analysis of Labor Market Outcomes: Lessons for the US from International Long-run Evidence.” In The Roaring Nineties: Can Full Employment be Sustained?, edited by KruegerA.SolowR., 159–218. New York: Russell Sage and Century Foundations.
9.
BreitungJ.DasS.. 2005. “Panel Unit Root Tests Under Cross Sectional Dependence.” Statistica Neerlandica59:414–33.
10.
BrownA. J. G.KöttlJ.. 2012. “Active Labor Market Programs Employment Gain or Fiscal Drain?” Kiel Working Paper No. 1785, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany.
11.
BuscherH.DregerC.RamosR.SurinachJ.. 2005. “The Impact of Institutions on the Employment Performance in European Labor Markets.” IZA Discussion Paper 1732, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.
12.
DecressinJ.FatásA.. 1995. “Regional Labor Market Dynamics in Europe.” European Economic Review39:1627–55.
DurantonG.PugaD.. 2004. “Micro-foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4, edited by HendersonJ. V.ThisseJ. F., 2063–117. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
15.
EichhorstW.EscuderoV.MarxP.TobinS.. 2010. “The Impact of the Crisis on Employment and the Role of Labour Market Institutions.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5320, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA), Bonn, Germany.
16.
ElhorstJ. P.2003. “The Mystery of Regional Unemployment Differentials: Theoretical and Empirical Explanations.” Journal of Economic Surveys17:709–48.
17.
ElhorstJ. P.2014. Spatial Econometrics—From Cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
18.
FalkM.KoebelB.. 2001. “A Dynamic Heterogenous Labour Demand Model for German Manufacturing.” Applied Economics33:339–48.
19.
FlaigG.RottmannH.. 2013. “Labour Market Institutions and Unemployment: An International Panel Data Analysis.” Empirica40:635–54.
20.
HamermeshD. S.1986. “The Demand for Labor in the Long Run.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. I, edited by AshenfelterO.LayardR., 429–71. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
21.
HamermeshD. S.1993. Labor Demand. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HerwartzH.NiebuhrA.. 2011. “Growth, Unemployment and Labour Market Institutions: Evidence from a Cross-section of EU Regions.” Applied Economics43:4663–76.
23.
HerwartzH.SiedenburgF.. 2008. “Homogenous Panel Unit Root Tests Under Cross Sectional Dependence: Finite Sample Modifications and the Wild Bootstrap.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis53:137–50.
24.
KosfeldR.DregerC.. 2006. “Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment. A Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000.” Papers in Regional Science85:523–42.
25.
LaliveR.van OursJ.ZweimüllerJ.. 2006. “How Changes in Financial Incentives Affect the Duration of Unemployment.” Review of Economic Studies73:1009–38.
26.
LevinA.LinC. F.ChuC. J.. 2002. “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties.” Journal of Econometrics108:1–24.
27.
MarquezM.RamajoJ.HewingsG.. 2006. “Dynamic Effects within a Regional System: An Empirical Approach.” Environment and Planning A38:711–32.
28.
MarquezM.RamajoJ.HewingsG.. 2010. “A Spatio-temporal Econometric Model of Regional Growth in Spain.” Journal of Geographical Systems12:207–26.
29.
MitzeT.ÖzyurtS.. 2014. “The Spatial Dimension of Trade- and FDI-driven Productivity Growth in Chinese Provinces: A Global Cointegration Approach.” Growth and Change45:263–91.
30.
MourreG.2006. “Did the Pattern of Aggregate Employment Growth Change in the EURO Area in the Late 1990s?” Applied Economics38:1783–807.
31.
NeumarkD.WascherW.. 2004. “Minimum Wages, Labor Market Institutions, and Youth Employment: A Cross-national Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review57:223–48.
32.
NickellS.1997. “Unemployment and Labour Market Rigidities: Europe versus North America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives11:55–74.
33.
NickellS.LayardR.. 1999. “Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by AshenfelterO.CardD., Vol. 3, 3029–84. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
34.
NickellS.NunziataL.OchselW.. 2005. “Unemployment in the OECD Since the 1960s. What Do We Know?” Economic Journal115:1–27.
35.
NunziataL.2005. “Institutions and Wage Determination: A Multi-country Approach.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics67:435–66.
36.
NymoenR.SparrmanV.. 2014. “Equilibrium Unemployment Dynamics in a Panel of OECD Countries.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics77:164–90. doi:10.1111/obes.12061.
37.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1994. OECD 1994, The OECD Jobs Study. Paris, France: OECD.
PetrongoloB.PissaridesC. A.. 2001. “Looking into the Black Box: A Survey of the Matching Function.” Journal of Economic Literature39:390–431.
40.
RobsonM.2009. “Structural Change, Specialization and Regional Labour Market Performance: Evidence for the UK.”Applied Economics41:275–93.
41.
SolowR.2000. “Unemployment in the United States and in Europe: A Contrast and Reasons.” In The European Unemployment Problem, StudienIfo, Vol. 46, 1–12. IFO Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Munich.
42.
VisserJ.2011. Data Base on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts, 1960-2010 (ICTWSS). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS, University of Amsterdam.
43.
WhiteH.1980. “A Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity.” Econometrica48:817–38.
