In all of his numerous publications, Andy Isserman has consistently advocated the development of new and suitable theories and methods for planning for the future. The purpose of this brief article is to reflect Andy Isserman’s scientific contributions to Urban and Regional Planning and to reaffirm the need to search for and develop appropriate scientific reasoning and methods to solve urban and regional issues in the Information Age.
GordonPeterRichardsonHarry W.
. 1997. “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 95–105
2.
IssermanAndrew M.1977. “Planning Practice and Planning Education: The Case of Quantitative Methods.”Bulletin of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning15:1–7
3.
IssermanAndrew M.1985. “Dare to Plan: An Essay on the role of the Future in Planning Practice and Education.”Town Planning Review56 (4): 483–91
4.
IssermanAndrew M.LeverWilliam F..
1993. “A Tale of Two Centres: Case Studies in the Institutional Evolution and Survival of Urban and Regional Studies.”Urban Studies30 (2): 229–36
5.
KimT. J.1978. “A Model of Zoning for a Metropolis.”Environment and Planning A10-6:1035–47
6.
KimT. J.1986. “Modeling the Density Variations of Urban Land Uses with Transportation Network Congestion.”Journal of Urban Economics19:264–76
7.
RhoJeong HyunKimT. J.
, 1989. “Solving a Three-Dimensional Urban Activity Model of Land-Use Intensity and Transportation Congestion.”Journal of Regional Science29 (4): 595–613
