Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The literature on knowledge utilization generally reveals limited use of social science research in policymaking, and the proliferation of information sources and access suggests further erosion of traditional sources of expertise. However, many studies of knowledge utilization assess whether policymakers consider written research- articles, books, reports - in reaching decisions. This emphasis on the written research product neglects an important vehicle for transmitting research to policymakers: the researchers themselves and their intermediaries. I argue that social science and policy research do influence public policymaking, yet the influence of research is mediated through think tanks and other boundary individuals and organizations that digest and transmit information to policymakers. Scholars studying research utilization should recognize the importance of people apart from written research, and scholars hoping to influence policymaking should recognize that publications alone are unlikely to sway policymakers. I offer some suggestions for how scholars and legislators can better connect knowledge and power.

Keywords

knowledge utilization expertise policymaking decision-making think tanks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson, Donald E. 2002. Do think tanks matter? Assessing the impact of public policy institutes. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

---. 2006. A capitol idea: Think thanks & US Foreign Policy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Bumiller, Elisabeth. 2008. Research Groups Boom in Washington. New York Times, January 30.

Caplan, Nathan , A. Morrison , and R. Stambaugh. 1975. The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level. Ann Arbor, MI : Institute for Social Research.

Danziger, Sheldon. 2001. Welfare reform from Nixon to Clinton: What role for social science? In Social science and policy-making: The search for relevance in the twentieth century, ed. David L. Feather-man and Maris A. Vinovskis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Esterling, Kevin M. 2004. The political economy of expertise: Information and efficiency in American politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Greenberg, David H. , and Marvin B. Mandell . 1991. Research utilization in policymaking: A tale of two series (of social experiments). Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10:633-56.

Heclo, Hugh. 1975. OMB and the Presidency: The problem of ‘Neutral Competence.’. The Public Interest 38:80-98.

Henig, Jeffrey R. 2008. Spin cycle: How research is used in policy debates: The case of charter schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

10.

Hird, John A. 2005. Power, knowledge, and politics: Policy analysis in the states. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

11.

Jones, Charles O. 1976. Why congress can’t do policy analysis (or words to that effect). Policy Analysis 2:251-64.

12.

Kirp, David L. 1992. The end of policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5:693-6.

13.

Lindblom, Charles E. , and David K. Cohen . 1979. Useable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

14.

Lupia, Arthur , and Mathew D. McCubbins . 1994. Who controls? Information and the structure of legislative decision making. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:361-84.

15.

McGann, James G. 2007a. 2007 survey of think tanks: A summary report. Foreign Policy Research Institute.

16.

---. 2007b. The global ‘Go-To Think Tanks’: The leading public policy research organizations in the world. Foreign Policy Research Institute.

17.

Nathan, Richard P. 2000. Social science in government: The role of policy researchers . Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.

18.

Patton, Michael Q. , Patricia Smith Grimes , Kathryn M. Guthrie , Nancy J. Brennan , Barbara Dickey French , and Dale A. Blyth . 1977. In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research. In Using social research in public policy making, ed. Carol H. Weiss. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

19.

Ricci, David M. 1993. The transformation of American politics: The New Washington and the rise of think tanks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

20.

Rich, Andrew. 2004. Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Schick, Allen. 1976. The supply and demand for analysis on Capitol Hill . Policy Analysis 2:215-34.

22.

Shulock, Nancy. 1999. The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18:226-44.

23.

Stone, Diane , and Andrew Denham , eds. 2004. Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.

24.

Szanton, Peter. 1981. Not well advised. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

25.

Weaver, Kent. 1989. The changing world of think tanks. PS: Political Science and Politics 22:563-78.

26.

Weimer, David L. 2005. Institutionalizing neutrally competent policy analysis: Resources for promoting objectivity and balance in consolidating democracies . Policy Studies Journal 33:131-46.

27.

Weiss, Carol H. 1978. Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection , ed. Laurence E. Lynn Jr. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

28.

---. 1979. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 39:426-31.

29.

Wilson, James Q. 1978. Social science and public policy: A personal note . In Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection, ed. Laurence E. Lynn Jr. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

The Study and Use of Policy Research in State Legislatures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References