Using a longitudinal micro data file of manufacturing plants (1974 to 1999), this study tests the relationship between trade and industrial specialization experienced by regional manufacturing economies. Consistent with trade driven by comparative advantage, the analysis demonstrates that export intensity (exports as a share of output) is positively associated with industrial specialization. This association is strongest in cross-section but remains, albeit weaker, when the data are differenced throughout time. The association between trade and specialization is strongest outside of urban areas and Ontario and Quebec, regions where trade is most likely driven by access to resource endowments. The association between trade and specialization weakens significantly after 1990, a period that corresponds with the rapid integration of the Canadian economy into the U.S. market resulting from trade liberalization.
Baldwin, J.R., and W.M. Brown.2001. Dynamics of the Canadian manufacturing sector in metropolitan and rural regions. Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series, catalogue no. 11F0019MIE2001169. Ottawa : Statistics Canada.
2.
———. 2004. Regional manufacturing employment volatility in Canada: The effects of specialization and trade. Papers in Regional Science383: 519-41.
3.
———. 2007. The differential effect of trade on plant size, product diversity and production run lengths across Canadian regions, 1974-1999 . Unpublished paper.
4.
Baldwin, J.R., and W. Gu.2006. The impact of trade on plant scale, production-run length and diversification. Economic Analysis Research Paper Series, catalogue no. 11F0027MIE2006038. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
5.
Baldwin, J.R., and M. Rafiquzzaman .1995. Restructuring in the Canadian manufacturing sector from 1970 to 1990: Industry and regional dimensions of job turnover. Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series, catalogue no. 11F0019MIE1995078. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
6.
Brown, W.M.2007. The ebb and flow of comparative advantage: Trade and the industrial specialization of Canadian manufacturing regions, 1974 to 1999 . Economic Analysis Research Paper Series, catalogue no. 11F0027MIE2007044. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
7.
Brown, W.M., and W.P. Anderson.1999. Influence of industrial and spatial structure on Canada-U.S. regional trade. Growth and Change30: 23-47.
8.
———. 2002. Spatial markets and the potential for economic integration betweenCanadian and U.S. regions. Papers in Regional Science81: 99-120.
9.
Brown, W.M., and J.R. Baldwin.2003. The changing geography of the Canadian manufacturing sector in metropolitan and rural regions, 1976-1997. Canadian Geographer47: 116-34.
10.
Bruölhart, M., and M. Thorpe.2001. Export growth of NAFTA members, intra-industry trade and adjustment. Global Business and Economics Review3: 94-110.
11.
Caves, R.E., M. Porter, A.M. Spence, and J.T. Scott.1980. Competition in the open economy: A model applied to Canada. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Christaller, W. [1933] 1966. Central places in southern Germany . Translated by C. W. Baskin. London: Prentice Hall.
13.
Daly, D.J., B.A. Keys, and E.J. Spence.1968. Scale specialization in Canadian manufacturing. Economic Council Staff Study, no. 21. Ottawa: Queen's Printer.
14.
Davis, D.1995. Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach . Journal of International Economics39: 201-26.
15.
Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A.J. Venables.1999. The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
16.
Head, K., and J. Ries.1999a. Can small-country manufacturing survive trade liberalization? Evidence from the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. In Perspectives on North American free trade, paper no. 1, catalogue no. C21-28/2-1999. Ottawa: Industry Canada, Strategic Policy Sector, Micro-Economic Policy Analysis Branch.
17.
———. 1999b. Rationalization effects of tariff reductions. Journal of International Economics47: 295-320.
18.
———. 2001. Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of U.S.-Canada trade. American Economic Review91: 858-76.
19.
Krugman, P.1980. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review70: 950-59.
20.
Krugman, P.R.1991a. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
21.
———. 1991b. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy99: 483-99.
22.
McCallum, J.1999. Two cheers for the FTA: Tenth-year review of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. In Econoscope. Toronto : Royal Bank of Canada.
23.
Schwanen, D.1997. Trading up: The impact of increased continental integration on trade, investment and jobs in Canada. Commentary no. 37. Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute.
24.
Spence, A.M.1977. Efficiency, scale and trade in Canadian manufacturing industries. In Studies in Canadian Industrial Organization , ed. R. E. Caves, M. E. Porter, A. M. Spence, and J. T. Scott, with A. Lemelin.Study no. 28 for the Royal Commission on Corporate Concentration. Ottawa : Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
25.
Statistics Canada.Various years. Annual survey of manufactures. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
26.
Trefler, D.2004. The long and short of the Canada/U.S. Free Trade Agreement . American Economic Review94: 870-95.
