This article presents some new estimates of the degree of returns to scale for European regional manufacturing, for the period 1986—2002. To obtain these estimates, the article makes use of a Verdoorn law framework, estimating both demand- and supply-side versions of the law. Estimation is further embedded within a spatial econometric framework that allows for both ``substantive'' and ``nuisance'' sources of spatial autocorrelation. The former arises from cross-regional spillovers in the growth process, while the latter is a result of the use of the administrative NUTS1 definition of regions. Whereas the demand-side version of the Verdoorn law yields estimates of substantial increasing returns, the supply-side version is unable to refute the hypothesis of constant returns. It is argued, however, that the demand-side version is to be preferred on a priori grounds. The article also considers the static-dynamic Verdoorn law paradox and successfully confirms a recently proposed explanation of this paradox.
Alcalá, F., and A. Ciccone.2004. Trade and productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics119: 613—46.
2.
Anselin, L.2006. Spatial econometrics. In Palgrave handbook of econometrics. Vol. 1, Econometric theory, ed. T. C. Mills and K. Patterson, 901—69. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
Anselin, L., A. Bera, R.J.G.M. Florax, and M. Yoon.1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics26: 77—104.
4.
Anselin, L., and S. Rey.1991. Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis23: 112—31.
5.
Arrow, K.1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies29: 155—73.
6.
Baldwin, R., and P. Martin.2004. Agglomeration and regional growth. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, ed. V. Henderson and J. Thisse , 2672—711. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
7.
Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-i-Martin .1991. Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1: 107—58.
8.
———. 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy100: 223—51.
9.
———. 2004. Economic growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Bartlett, M.S.1949. Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics5: 207—12.
11.
Bernat, G.A., Jr.1996. Does manufacturing matter? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor's laws. Journal of Regional Science36: 463—77.
12.
Borts, G.H., and J.L. Stein.1964. Economic growth in a free market. New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Ciccone, A.2002. Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review46: 213—27.
14.
Ciccone, A., and R.E. Hall.1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review86: 54—70.
15.
da Mata, D., U. Deichmann, J.V. Henderson, S.V. Lall, and H.G. Wang.Forthcoming. Determinants of city growth in Brazil. Journal of Urban Economics.
16.
Dixon, R., and A.P. Thirlwall.1975. A model of regional growth rate differences along Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers27: 201—14.
17.
Douglas, P.1976. The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. Journal of Political Economy84: 903—15.
18.
Elhorst, J.P.2003. Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models . International Regional Science Review24: 244—68.
19.
Fingleton, B., and J. LeGallo.2006. Finite sample properties of estimators of spatial models with autoregressive, or moving average, disturbances and system feedback. Paper presented at the 53rd annual North American meetings of the Regional Science Association International , November 16—18, Toronto, Canada.
20.
Fingleton, B., and J.S.L. McCombie .1998. Increasing returns and economic growth: Some evidence from the European Union regions. Oxford Economic Papers50: 89—105.
21.
Florax, R.J.G.M., and H. Folmer.1992. Specification and estimation of spatial linear regression models: Monte Carlo evaluation of pre-test estimators. Regional Science and Urban Economics22: 405—32.
22.
Florax, R.J.G.M., H. Folmer, and S.J. Rey.2003. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: The relevance of Hendry's methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics33: 557—79.
23.
Frankel, J.A., and D. Romer.1999. Does trade cause growth?American Economic Review89: 379—99.
24.
Glaeser, E.L., H.D. Kallal, J.A. Scheinkman, and A. Sheifer.1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy100: 1126—52.
McCombie, J.S.L.1982a. How important is the spatial diffusion of innovations in explaining regional growth disparities? UrbanStudies19: 377—82.
38.
———. 1982b. Economic growth, Kaldor's laws and the static-dynamic Verdoorn law paradox. Applied Economics14: 279—94.
39.
McCombie, J.S.L., and J.R. de Ridder .1984. The Verdoorn law controversy: Some new empirical evidence using US state data. Oxford Economic Papers36: 268—84.
40.
McCombie, J.S.L., M. Pugno, and S. Bruno.2002. Productivity growth and economic performance: Essays on Verdoorn's law. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
41.
McCombie, J.S.L., and M. Roberts.2007. Returns to scale and regional growth: The static-dynamic Verdoorn law paradox revisited. Journal of Regional Science47: 179—208.
42.
McCombie, J.S.L., and A.P. Thirlwall.1994. Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraint. London: Macmillan.
43.
Moroney, J.R.1972. The structure of production in American manufacturing . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
44.
Pons-Novell, J., and E. Viladecans-Marsal. 1999. Kaldor's laws and spatial dependence: Evidence for the European regions. Regional Studies33: 443—51.
45.
Porter, M.1996. Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review19: 85—90.
46.
Redding, S., and A.J. Venables.2004. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics62: 53—82.
47.
Roberts, M.2004. The growth performances of the GB counties: Some new empirical evidence for 1977—1993. Regional Studies38: 149—65.
48.
———. 2006. Seek and you will (not) find: Model specification and search in the presence of two-directional spatial autocorrelation. Paper presented at the 53rd annual North American meetings of the Regional Science Association International, November 16—18, Toronto, Canada.
49.
Roberts, M., and M. Setterfield.2007. Endogenous regional growth: A critical survey. Working paper, Cambridge Centre for Economic and Public Policy, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge , United Kingdom.
50.
Rowthorn, R.E.1975. What remains of Kaldor's law?Economic Journal85: 10—19.
51.
Shioji, E.1997. It's still 2%: Evidence on convergence from 116 years of US states panel data. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
52.
Solow, R.M.1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics70: 65-94.
53.
Swan, T.1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record32: 334—61.
54.
Thirlwall, A.P.1980. Regional problems are balance of payments problems. Regional Studies14: 419—26.
55.
Verdoorn, P.J.1949. Fattori che Regolano lo Sviluppo della Produttività del Lavoro. L'Industria1: 3—10. Translated by Anthony Thirlwall. Chap. 3 in Productivity growth and economic performance: Essays on Verdoorn's law, ed. J. S. L. McCombie , M. Pugno, and B. Soro. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2002.
56.
Wold, H., and P. Faxer.1957. On the specification error in regression analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics28: 265—67.
