As agricultural frontiers expand, and habitats contract, potential conflicts between conservation and development goals increase. Transferable development rights (TDR) programs offer a means of minimizingthe opportunitycosts (in foregoneagricultural rents) of protectinga desired quantity of habitat. These programs may be particularly applicable to Brazil, where long-standing regulations require a fixed proportion of each property to be set aside as a forest reserve. The article develops a simple, geographically explicit simulation model to examine the economic and environmental impact of a hypothetical TDR program under alternative implementation scenarios. Dataonlandcover and land productivity from the Brazilianstate of Minas Gerais are used to calibrate the model. The model shows substantial reductions in conservation cost from widening the geographical scope of trading. Restricting the program to large landholders drastically reduces transactions costs while only mildly reducing the amount of forest placed under protection.
American Farmland Trust2001. Transfer of development rights fact sheet. Washington, DC: American Farmland Trust. http://www.farmlandinfo.org/documents/27746/FS_TDR_1-01.pdf (accessed April 21, 2004).
3.
Bernardes, Aline T. 1999. Some mechanisms for biodiversity protection in Brazil, with emphasis on their application in the state of Minas Gerais. Paper prepared for the Brazil Global Overlay Project, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC.
4.
Bierregaard, Richard O., Jr., and Virginia H. Dale. 1996. Islands in an ever-changing sea: The ecological and socioeconomicdynamics of Amazonian rainforest fragments. In Forest patches in tropical landscapes, ed. John Schelhas and Russell Greenberg. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5.
Bruner, A. G., R. E. Gullison, R. E. Rice, and G. A. B. da Fonseca. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science291: 125-128.
6.
Cervigni, R.1993. Biodiversity, incentives to deforest and tradeable development rights. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) Working Paper GEC 93-07, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/publications/wp/.
7.
Chomitz, K. M., E. Brenes, and L. Constantino. 1999. Financing environmental services: The Costa Rican experience. Science of the Total Environment240: 157-169.
8.
Chomitz, K. M., and D. A. Gray. 1996. Roads, land use, and deforestation: A spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Economic Review10: 487-512.
9.
Chomitz, K. M., and K. Kumari. 1998. The domestic benefits of tropical forest preservation: A critical review emphasizing hydrological functions. World Bank Research Observer13: 13-35.
10.
Costa, Cláudia M. R., Gisela Herrmann, Cásio Soares Martins, Lívia Vanucci Lins, and Ivana Reis Lamas. 1998. Biodiversidade em Minas Gerais: um Atlas para sua Conservação. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Fundação Biodiversitas.
11.
Danner, J. C.1997. TDRs—Great idea but questionable value. Appraisal Journal65: 133-142.
12.
Environmental Law Institute1997. Implementing an emissions cap and allowance trading system for greenhouse gases: Lessons from the Acid Rain Program. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute. http://www.eli.org.
13.
Environmental Law Institute2002. Emissions reduction trading systems: An overview of recent results and an assessment of best practices. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute. http://www.eli.org.
14.
15.
Germani, Luiz Augusto. 1997. O custo de preservação. O Estado do São Paulo, October 29.
16.
17.
IBGE. 1998. Censo Agropecuário 1995-1996. Número 16:Minas Gerais. CD-ROM. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE).
18.
Johnston, R., and M. Madison. 1997. From landmarks to landscapes: A review of current practices in the transfer of development rights. Journal of the American Planning Association63: 365-378.
19.
Laurance, William F., and R. O. Bierregaard Jr.1997. Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Mahar, Dennis, and Cecile Ducrot. 1999. Land-use zoning on tropical frontiers: Emerging lessons from the Brazilian Amazon. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
21.
Nogueira-Neto, Paulo.1998.As Florestas e o Imposto Territorial Rural. O Estadodo SãoPaulo, June8.
22.
Panayotou, T.1994. Conservation of biodiversity and economic development: The concept of transferable development rights. Environmental and Resource Economics4: 91-110.
23.
Parks, Peter J., and Randall A. Kramer. 1995. A policy simulation of the Wetlands Reserve Program.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management28: 223-240.
24.
Pearce, David, Francis E. Putz Jr., and Jerome K. Vanclay. 2003. Sustainable forestry in the tropics: Panacea or folly?Forest Ecology and Management172: 229-247.
25.
Pruetz, R.1997. Saved by development: Preserving environmental areas, farmland and historic landmarks with transfer of development rights. Burbank, CA: Arje Press.
26.
Rice, R., C. Sugal, and I. Bowles. 1998. Sustainable forest management: A review of the current conventional wisdom. Washington, DC: Conservation International.
27.
Schelhas, John, and Russell Greenberg, eds. 1996. Forest patches in tropical landscapes. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo. 1996. The economics of biodiversity in Brazil: The case of forest conversion. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IPEA.
29.
Simpson, R. D., and R. A. Sedjo. 1996. Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Political Economy104: 1548-1570.
30.
Soulié do Amaral, Carlos. 1997. Atualização de cadastro muda quadro de posse de terra. O Estado doSão Paulo, December 15.
31.
Stavins, R. N.1995. Transaction costs and tradable permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management29: 133-148.
32.
Stavins, R. N., and Adam B. Jaffe. 1990. Unintended impacts of public investment on private decisions: The depletion of forested wetlands. American Economic Review80: 337-352.
33.
Tripp, J. T. B., and D. J. Dudek.1989. Institutional guidelines for designing successful transferable rights programs. Yale Journal of Regulation6: 369-391.
34.
UNCTAD1998. Greenhouse gas emissions trading: Defining the principles, modalities, rules, and guidelines for verification, reporting, and accountability. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
35.
Wright, J. B.1994. Designing and applying conservation easements. Journal of the American Planning Association60: 380-389.
