The authors analyze the consequences of imperfect output markets for the land-use decisions of semi-subsistence farmers in an agricultural frontier of southern Mexico. The approach is motivated by previous applications of the agriculture household model establishing that the farm household’s productionand consumptiondecisions are analytically nonseparable when markets are not used. Econometric results generated by a switching regression model suggest the importanceof distinguishing the discrete choiceof market participation from thatof area cultivated.
Achard, F., H. Eva, A. Glinni, P. Mayaux, T. Richards, and H. Stibig, eds. 1998. Identification of deforestation hot spot areas in the humid tropics. Trees Publ. Series B, Research Report no. 4. Brussels: Space Application Institute, Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit. Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
2.
Barnum, H., and L. Squire.1979. A modelof anagricultural household. Washington, DC: World Bank.
3.
Benjamin, D.1992. Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: Testing for separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica60: 287-322.
4.
Chomitz, K. M., and D. A. Gray. 1996. Roads, land, markets and deforestation: A spatial model of land use in Belize. World Bank Economic Review10: 487-512.
5.
Cropper, M., C. Griffiths, and M. Mani. 1999. Roads, population pressures, and deforestation in Thailand, 1976-1989. Land Economics75: 58-73.
6.
de Janvry, A., M. Fafchamps, and E. Sadoulet. 1991. Peasant household behavior with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. Economic Journal101: 1400-1417.
7.
de Janvry, A., E. Sadoulet, and G. Gordillo de Anda. 1995. NAFTA and Mexico’s maize producers. World Development23: 1349-1362.
8.
Deaton, A.1997. The analysis of household surveys: A microeconomic approach to development policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
Dolton, P. J., and G. H. Makepeace. 1987. Interpreting sample selection effects. Economic Letters24: 373-379.
10.
Godoy, R., J. Franks, K. O’Neill, S. Groff, P. Kostishack, A. Cubas, J. Demmer, K. McSweeney, J. Overman. D. Wilkie, N. Brokaw, and M. Martínez. 1997. Household determinants of deforestation by Amerindians in Bolivia. World Development25: 977-987.
11.
Goetz, S. J.1992. A selectivity model of household food marketing behaviour in Sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics74: 444-452.
12.
Greene, W. H.1997. Econometric analysis. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Heckman, J. J.1974. Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica42: 679-694.
14.
Huang, C., R. Raunikar, and S. Misra. 1991. The application and economic interpretation of selectivity models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics73: 496-501.
15.
INEGI 1985-87. Cartas topograficas. 1:50,000. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografica e Informatica.
16.
INEGI 1991a. Campeche: XI Censo General de Poblacion y Vivienda. Resultados Definitivos, Datos por Localidad Aguascalientes. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografica e Informatica.
17.
INEGI 1991b. Quintana Roo: XI Censo General de Poblacion y Vivienda. Resultados Definitivos,Datos por Localidad Aguascalientes. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografica e Informatica.
18.
Jacoby, H. G.1993. Shadow wages and peasant family labour supply: An econometric application to the Peruvian Sierra. Review of Economic Studies60: 903-921.
19.
Jones, W. D., V. H. Dale, J. J. Beauchamp, M. A. Pedlowski, and R. V. O’Neill. 1995. Farming in Rondonia. Resource and Energy Economics17: 155-188.
20.
Key, N., E. Sadoulet, and A. de Janvry. 2000. Transaction costs and agricultural household response.American Journal of Agricultural Economics82: 245-259.
21.
Killingsworth, M. R.1983. Labor supply. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Klepeis, P. 2000. Deforesting the once deforested: Land transformation in southeastern México. Doctoral diss., Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
23.
Lee, L. F.1982. Some approaches to the correction of selectivity bias. Review of Economic Studies49: 355-372.
24.
Lopez, R. E.1986. Structural models of the farm household that allow for interdependent utility and profit-maximization decisions. In Agricultural household models: Extensions, applications, and policy, ed. I. Singh, L. Squire, and J. Strauss. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
McDonald, J., and R. Moffitt. 1980. The uses of Tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics60: 318-321.
26.
Maddala, G. S.1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Medellin, M., L. Apedaile, and D. Pachico. 1994. Commercialization and price response of a beangrowing farming system in Columbia. Economic Development and Cultural Change23: 795-816.
28.
Monela, G. C. 1995. Tropical rainforest deforestation, biodiversity benefits, and sustainable land use: Analysis of economic and ecological aspects related to the Nguru Mountains, Tanzania. Doctoral diss., Agricultural University of Norway, Aas.
29.
Nelson, G. A., and D. Hellerstein. 1997. Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics79: 80-88.
30.
Omamo, S. W.1998a. Farm-to-market transaction costs and specialisation in small-scale agriculture: Explorations with a non-separable household model. Journal of Development Studies35: 152-163.
31.
Omamo, S. W.1998b. Transport costs and smallholder cropping choices: An application to Siaya District, Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics80: 116-123.
32.
Pfaff, A.1999. What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management37: 26-43.
33.
Pichón, F. J.1997. Colonist land-allocation decisions, land use, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon frontier. Economic Development and Cultural Change44: 127-164.
34.
Roe, T., and T. Graham-Tomasi. 1986. Yield risk in a dynamic model of the agricultural household. In Agricultural household models: Extensions, applications, and policy, ed. I. Singh, L. Squire, and J. Strauss. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35.
Sadoulet, E., A. de Janvry, and C. Benjamin. 1998. Household behavior with imperfect labor markets. Industrial Relations37: 85-108.
36.
Saha, A.1994. A two-season agricultural household model of output and price uncertainty. Journal of Development Economics45: 245-269.
37.
Singh, I., L. Squire, and J. Strauss, eds. 1986. Agricultural household models: Extensions, applications, and policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
Tao Yang, Dennis. 1997. Education and off-farm work. Economic Development and Cultural Change45: 613-632.
39.
Turner, B. L.1983. Once beneath the forest: Prehistoric terracing in the Rio Bec region of the Maya lowlands. Dellplain Latin American Studies no. 13. Boulder, CO: Westview.
40.
Warwick, D. P., and C. A. Luinger. 1975. The sample survey: Theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
