The intended destination pattern of immigrant settlement is a potentially dynamic choice, with fiscal and adjustment implications for both immigrants and the receiving area. Using yearly data from the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the intended immigrant settlement pattern is examined within a pooled cross-section time-series framework, focusing on the twenty-five largest U.S. metropolitan areas between 1980 and 1990. Trends in settlement patterns differentiate between the immigration streams from various sources and immigrant classes. Although no systematic differences were found across national origin groups, the results show that the choice of the intended destination is a dynamic process. Characteristics and determinants of settlement choice, particularly with respect to family and friends effects (as opposed to economic effects), change over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alba, R. D.
, and J. R. Logan. 1991. Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography28: 431-453.
2.
Allen, J. P.
, and E. Turner. 1996. Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation. The Professional Geographer48: 140-155.
3.
Bartel, A. P.
, and M. M. Koch. 1991. Internal migration of U.S. immigrants. In Immigration, trade and the labor market, edited by J. M. Abowd and R. B. Freeman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Bean, F. D.
, and M. Tienda. 1987. The Hispanic population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage.
5.
Borjas, G. J.1985. Assimilation, changes in cohort quality, and the earnings of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics3: 463-489.
6.
Boswell, T.
, and J. R. Curtis. 1984. The Cuban-American experience: Culture, images and perspectives. Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
Brown, L. A.
, and J. P. Jones. 1985. Spatial variation in migration processes and development: A Costa Rican example of conventional modeling augmented by the expansion method. Demography22: 327-352.
8.
Casetti, E.1972. Generating models by the expansion method. Geographical Analysis4: 81-91.
9.
Castles, S.
, and M. J. Miller. 1993. The age of migration. New York: Guilford.
10.
Clark, W.A.V.1998. The California cauldron. New York: Guilford.
11.
Desbarats, J.1985. Indochinese resettlement in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers75: 522-538.
12.
Dunlevy, J. A.
, and H. A. Gemery. 1977. The role of migrant stock and lagged migration in the settlement patterns of 19th century immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics59: 137-144.
13.
Ellis, M.
, and R. Wright. 1998a. The balkanization metaphor in the analysis of U.S. immigration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers88: 686-698.
14.
Ellis, M.
, and R. Wright. 1998b. When immigrants are not migrants: Counting arrivals of the foreign-born using the U.S. census. International Migration Review32: 127-144.
15.
Frey, W.1995. Immigration and internal migration “flight”: A California case study. Population and Environment16: 353-375.
16.
Frey, W.1996. Immigrant and native migrant magnets. American Demographics18: 37-53.
17.
Garvey, D. L.
, and T. J. Espenshade. 1997. State and local fiscal impacts of New Jersey’s immigrant and native households. In Keys to successful immigration: Implications of the New Jersey experience, edited by T. J. Espenshade. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
18.
Gorrie, P.1991. Farewell to Chinatown. Canadian Geographic111: 1-28.
19.
Greenlees, C. S.
, and R. Saenz. 1999. Determinants of employment of recently arrived Mexican immigrant wives. International Migration Review33: 354-377.
20.
Greenwood, M. J.1969. An analysis of the determinants of geographic labor mobility in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics51: 189-194.
21.
Greenwood, M. J.
, J. M. McDowell, and E. Trabka. 1991. Conducting descriptive and analytical research with the immigration and naturalization service public use tapes. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement17: 131-153.
22.
Howenstine, E.1996. Ethnic change in and segregation in Chicago. In Ethnicity, edited by C. C. Roseman, H. D. Laux, and G. Thieme, 31-50. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
Isbister, J.1996. The immigration debate: Remaking America. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
24.
Isserman, A.
, and J. Kort. 1988. Regional economic consequences of U.S. immigration policy. Working Paper 8810, Regional Research Institute, Morgantown, WV.
25.
Jones, J. P., III
, and E. Casetti. 1992. Applications of the expansion Method. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
26.
Kritz, M. M.
, and J. M. Nogle. 1994. Nativity concentration and internal migration among the foreign-born. Demography31: 509-524.
27.
Levitt, P.1998. Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review32: 926-948.
28.
Lieberson, S.
, and M. C. Waters. 1987. The location of ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Sociological Forum2: 780-810.
29.
Malecki, E. J.1975. Examining change in rank-size systems of cities. The Professional Geographer27: 43-47.
30.
Massey, D. S.1990. Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index56: 3-26.
31.
Massey, D. S.
, J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J. E. Taylor. 1994. An evaluation of international migration theory: The North American case. Population and Development Review20: 699-751.
32.
McHugh, K. E.
, I. N. Miyares, and E. H. Skop. 1997. The magnetism of Miami: Segmented paths in Cuban migration. Geographical Review87: 504-519.
33.
Moore, E. G.
, and M. W. Rosenberg. 1995. Modeling migration flows of immigrant groups in Canada. Environment and Planning A27: 699-714.
34.
Newbold, K. B.2000. Intended and initial settlement patterns of recent immigrants to the US, 1985-90: A comparison of PUMS and INS public use files. Population and Environment21: 539-564.
35.
Pedraza, S.
, and R. G. Rumbaut. 1996. Origins and destinations: Immigration, race and ethnicity in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
Piore, M. J.1979. Birds of passage: Migrant labor and industrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Portes, A.1994. Introduction: Immigration and its aftermath. International Migration Review28: 632-639.
38.
Portes, A.
, and R. Rumbaut. 1990. Immigrant America: A portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Rhoads, B. L.1991. A continuously varying parameter model of downstream hydraulic geometry. Water Resources Research27: 1865-1872.
40.
Roseman, C.
1999. Across the “divide”: Ethnic population change in small places in the US. Paper presented at the 95th meeting of the Association of American Geographers, March, Honolulu, HI.
41.
Sjaastad, L. A.1962. The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy70: 80-93.
42.
Trovato, F.
, and S. S. Halli. 1990. Ethnicity and geographic mobility. In Ethnic demography, edited by S. S. Halli. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
43.
Uhlenburg, P. H.1973. Non-economic determinants of nonmigration: Sociological considerations for migration theory. Rural Sociology38: 296-311.
44.
U.S. Bureau of the Census
. 1983. Census of population and housing, 1980: Public use microdata sample (machine-readable files). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
45.
U.S. Bureau of the Census
. 1992. Census of population and housing, 1990: Public use microdata sample (machine-readable files). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
46.
U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)
. 1992. Statistical yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1992. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
47.
Walker, R.
, and M. Hannan. 1989. Dynamic settlement processes: The case of US immigration. The Professional Geographer41: 172-183.
48.
Zavodny, M.2000. Determinants of recent immigrants’ locational choices. International Migration Review33: 1014-1030.
49.
Zelinsky, W.
, and B. A. Lee. 1998. Heterolocalism: An alternative model of the sociospatial behavior of immigrant ethnic communities. International Journal of Population Geography4: 281-298.
