A key feature of the South East regional economy in recent decades has been the development of several intermediate markets in specialized business services. This article investigates whether the greater development of specialized markets in the South East is associated with different competitive and technological behaviors of innovative firms in this region when compared with firms in the Industrial Heartland regions of the West Midlands, North West England, and York-shire and Humberside. We find greater buying and selling of technology by firms and the presence of technological externalities in the South East, even when the services-intensive nature of the region’s production is accounted for. Industrial Heartland firms, in contrast, more frequently collaborate with domestic suppliers who are also an important source of technology. They also have greater collaboration with higher education institutes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonelli, C.1998. The microdynamics of technological change. London: Routledge.
2.
Athreye, S.1998. On markets in knowledge. Journal of Management and Governance1: 231-253.
3.
Bresnahan, T.
, and A. Gambardella. 1998. The division of inventive labour and the extent of the market. In General purpose technologies and economic growth, edited by E. Helpman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Bullock, A.
, J. Duncan, and E. Wood. 1996. The survey method, sample attrition and the SME panel database. In The changing state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium sized firms, 1986-95, edited by A. Cosh and A. Hughes, 94-101. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
5.
Cosh, A. D.
, and A. Hughes1996. The changing state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and comparative advantage in small and medium sized firms, 1986-95. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
6.
Curran, J.
, and R. A. Blackburn. 1994. Small firms and local economic networks: The death of the local economy?London: Chapman.
7.
Department of Trade and Industry
. 1998. Business start-ups and closures: VAT registrations and deregistrations in 1997. Statistical press release p/98/645.
8.
Huggins, R.2000. An index of competitiveness in the UK: Local, regional and global analysis. Mimeo. Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University, UK.
9.
Hughes, A.
, and E. Wood. 1999. Rethinking innovation comparisons between manufacturing and services: The experience of CBR SME surveys in the UK. Working Paper 140. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, UK.
10.
Keeble, D.1980. The South East: II Greater London. In Regional development in Britain, edited by G. Manners, D. Keeble, B. Rodgers, and K. Warren. 2d. ed.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
11.
Keeble, D.1996. North-south and urban-rural variations in SME performance, innovation and business characteristics. In The changing state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium sized firms 1986-95, edited by A. D. Cosh and A. Hughes, 83-93. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
12.
Keeble, D.1997. Small firms, innovation and regional development in Britain in the 1990s. Regional Studies31: 281-293.
13.
Keeble, D.1998. North-south and urban-rural variations in SME growth, innovation and networking in the 1990s. In Enterprise Britain: Growth, innovation and public policy in the small and medium sized enterprise sector 1994-1997, edited by A. D. Cosh and A. Hughes, 99-113. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
14.
Keeble, D.
, and J. Bryson. 1996. Small firm creation and growth, regional development and the north-south divide in Britain. Environment and Planning A28: 909-934.
15.
Kitson, M.
, and F. Wilkinson. 1996. Markets and competition. In The changing state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium sized firms 1986-95, edited by A. D. Cosh and A. Hughes. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
16.
Lewis, J.
, and A. Townsend, eds. 1989. The north-south divide: Regional change in Britain in the 1980s. London: Chapman.
17.
Martin, R.1988. The political economy of Britain’s north-south divide. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series13: 389-418.
18.
Moore, B.1996. Sources of innovation, technology transfer and diffusion. In The changing state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium sized firms 1986-95, edited by A. D. Cosh and A. Hughes. Cambridge, UK: ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
19.
O’Farrell, P. N.
, D.M.W.N. Hitchens, and L.A.R. Moffat. 1992. The competitiveness of business service firms: A matched comparison between Scotland and the south east of England. Regional Studies26: 519-533.
20.
O’Farrell, P. N.
, D.M.W.N. Hitchens, and L.A.R. Moffat. 1993. The competitiveness of business services and regional development: Evidence from Scotland and the south east of England. Urban Studies30: 1629-1652.
21.
O’Farrell, P. N.
, L.A.R. Moffat, and D.M.W.N Hitchens. 1993. Manufacturing demand for business services in a core and peripheral region: Does flexible production imply vertical disintegration of business services?Regional Studies27: 385-400.
22.
Office for National Statistics
. 1997. Regional trends. London: The Stationery Office.
23.
Rosenberg, N.1963. Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840-1910. Reprinted in N. Rosenberg, ed. 1976. Perspectives on technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Scazzieri, R.1993. A theory of production. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
25.
Stigler, G. J.1951. The division of labour is limited by the extent of the market. The Journal of Political Economy59: 185-193.
26.
Tether, B.
, and J. Howells. 2000. W(h)ither Manchester? Paper presented at the 8th International Schumpeter Society Conference, July, Manchester, UK.
27.
Wood, P.
, J. Bryson, and D. Keeble. 1993. Regional patterns of small firm development in the business services: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A25: 677-700.
28.
Young, A.1928. Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal38: 527-542.
