Since the 1970s, a small but significant number of American Indian nations have put together some of the most impressive stories of economic development in the United States. What insights do these stories have to offer for rural economic development generally? This article analyzes recent Indian reservation experience, concluding that local control, strategic thinking, effective governing institutions, and leadership all have played key roles in reservation development success. It considers implications of these findings for leadership and institutions in rural America.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barro, Robert
. 1991. Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics106: 407-443.
2.
Begay, Manley A., Jr.
, Stephen Cornell, and Miriam R. Jorgensen. Forthcoming. The role and limits of leadership in economic development: Evidence from American Indian cases. Working paper series, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.
3.
Bureau of Indian Affairs
. 1989. Indian service population and labor force estimates. Washington, DC: Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior.
4.
Bureau of Indian Affairs
. 1997. Indian service population and labor force estimates. Washington, DC: Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior.
5.
Chiras, Daniel D.
, and Julie Herman. 1997. Sustainable community development: A systems approach. In Rural sustainable development in America, edited by Ivonne Audirac, 107-127. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6.
Cornell, Stephen
, and Marta Cecilia Gil-Swedberg. 1995. Sociohistorical factors in institutional efficacy: Economic development in three American Indian cases. Economic Development and Cultural Change43: 239-268.
7.
Cornell, Stephen
, and Joseph P. Kalt. 1992. Reloading the dice: Improving the chances for economic development on American Indian reservations. In What can tribes do? Strategies and institutions in American Indian economic development, edited by Stephen Cornell and Joseph P. Kalt, 1-59. Los Angeles: American Indian Studies Center, University of California.
8.
Cornell, Stephen
, and Joseph P. Kalt. 1995. Where does economic development really come from? Constitutional rule among the contemporary Sioux and Apache. Economic Inquiry33: 402-426.
9.
Cornell, Stephen
, and Joseph P. Kalt. 1997. Successful economic development and heterogeneity of governmental form on American Indian reservations. In Getting good government: Capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries, edited by Merilee S. Grindle, 257-296. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.
10.
Cornell, Stephen
, and Joseph P. Kalt. 1998. Sovereignty and nation-building: The development challenge in Indian Country today. American Indian Culture and Research Journal22: 187-214.
11.
Cornell, Stephen
, and Joseph P. Kalt. 2000. Where’s the glue? Institutional bases of American Indian economic development. Journal of Socio-Economics29: 443-470.
12.
DiMaggio, Paul J.
, and Walter W. Powell. 1991. Introduction. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 1-38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Egnal, Marc
. 1996. Divergent paths: How culture and institutions have shaped North American growth. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Ferrara, Peter J.1998. The Choctaw revolution: Lessons for federal Indian policy. Washington, DC: Americans for Tax Reform Foundation.
15.
Fitchin, Janet M.1991. Endangered spaces, enduring places: Change, identity, and survival in rural America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16.
Galston, William A.
, and Karen J. Baehler. 1995. Rural development in the United States: Connecting theory, practice, and possibilities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
Hustedde, Ronald J.1991. Developing leadership to address rural problems. In Rural community economic development, edited by Norman Walzer, 111-123. New York: Praeger.
18.
Jensen, Michael
, and William Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics3: 305-360.
19.
Jorgensen, Miriam R.
, and Jonathan Taylor. 2000. Patterns of Indian enterprise success: A statistical analysis of tribal and individual Indian enterprise performance. Report to the National Congress of American Indians, Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development.
20.
Kendall-Miller, Heather
. 1998. Re: Supreme Court decision in State v. Venetie. Memorandum, Native American Rights Fund, Anchorage, Alaska, 22 February.
21.
Knack, Stephen
, and Philip Keefer. 1995. Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics7: 207-227.
22.
Krepps, Matthew B.
, and Richard E. Caves. 1994. Bureaucrats and Indians: Principal-agent relations and efficient management of tribal forest resources. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization24: 133-151.
23.
La Porta, Rafael
, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishney. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance52: 1131-1150.
24.
La Porta, Rafael
, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishney. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy106: 1113-1155.
25.
Murray, Michael
, and Larry Dunn. 1996. Revitalizing rural America: A perspective on collaboration and community. New York: Wiley.
26.
National Congress of American Indians
. 1998. Addressing tribal employment responsibilities under welfare reform: A national forum. Manuscript of executive summary of discussion on 14 June 1998, National Congress of American Indians, Washington, DC.
27.
Nelson, Peter B.
, and William B. Beyers. 1998. Using economic base models to explain new trends in rural income. Growth and Change29: 295-318.
28.
North, Douglass C.1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Oberschall, Anthony
. 1990. Incentives, governance, and development in Chinese collective agriculture. In Social institutions: Their emergence, maintenance and effects, edited by Michael Hechter, Karl-Dieter Opp, and Reinhard Wippler, 265-289. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
30.
Ostrom, Elinor
. 1992. Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
31.
Pevar, Stephen L.1992. The rights of Indians and tribes: The basic ACLU guide to Indian and tribal rights. 2d ed.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32.
Radin, Beryl
, Robert Arganoff, Ann O’M. Bowman, C. Gregory Buntz, J. Steven Ott, Barbara S. Romzek, and Robert H. Wilson. 1996. New governance for rural America: Creating intergovernmental partnerships. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
33.
Rona-Tas, Akos
. 1998. Path-dependence and capital theory: Sociology of the post-communist economic transformation. East European Politics and Societies12: 107-131.
34.
Rural America
. 1998. Agriculture fact book. Available at http://www.usda.gov/news/pubs/fbook98/ch4
35.
Rural Sociological Society Task Force on Persistent Rural Poverty
. 1993. Persistent poverty in rural America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
36.
Shively, Robert W.1997. Small town economic development: Principles of organization. Economic Development Review15 (3): 43-46.
37.
Stark, David
. 1996. Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology101: 993-1027.
38.
U.S. Bureau of the Census
. 1993. 1990 census of population, social and economic characteristics: American Indian and Alaska native areas. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
