Infrastructure is best envisioned as services that come from a set of public works, not as physical facilities. In concept, infrastructure can expand rural economies by raising productivity levels, allowing expansion in the use of other resources, and attracting resources. Empirical research evidences that at the margin, the net effect of the three factors is for infrastructure to have only a modest effect on economic performance. Infrastructure investments will normally have their biggest impact in economically integrated and intermediate rural areas. Nonetheless, a basic complement of infrastructure is essential to support economic activity, but this set should be seen as accommodating rather than causing growth. Local, market-based approaches are normally the best way to develop the infrastructure and to ensure that an area has the basic infrastructure that can be maintained, supported, and used effectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apogee Research, Inc.1991. Case studies of the link between transportation and economic productivity. Report prepared for the Federal Highway Administration.
2.
Aschauer, David A.1989. Is public expenditure productive?Journal of Monetary Economics23: 177-200.
3.
Aschauer, David A.1990. Why is infrastructure important? In Is there a shortfall in public capital investment? edited by Alicia H. Munnell, 21-50. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
4.
Aschauer, David A.1998. The role of public infrastructure capital in Mexican economic growth. Economia-Mexicana7: 47-78.
5.
Berndt, Ernst R.
, and Bengt Hansson. 1991. Measuring the contribution of public infrastructure capital in Sweden. Paper presented at the seminar of the Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research, 5-6 March, Saltsjobaden, Sweden.
6.
Canullo, Giuseppe
. 1992. Industrialization of rural areas: The Italian NEC model. In Businesses and jobs in the rural world, 151-164. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
7.
Costa, Jose da Silva
, Richard W. Ellson, and Randolph C. Martin. 1987. Public capital, regional output, and development: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science27: 419-437.
8.
Cronin, Francis J.
, Elisabeth K. Colleran, Paul L. Herber, and Steven Lewitzky. 1993. Telecommunications and growth: The contribution of telecommunications infrastructure investment to aggregate and sectoral productivity. Telecommunications Policy17: 677-690.
9.
Cummings, R.
, W. Schulze, S. Gerking, and D. Brookshire. 1986. Measuring the elasticity of substitution of wages for municipal infrastructure: A comparison of the survey and hedonic approaches. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management13: 266-276.
10.
Deno, Kevin T.1988. The effect of public capital on U.S. manufacturing activity: 1970 to 1978. Southern Economic Journal55: 400-411.
11.
Deno, Kevin T.
, and Randall W. Eberts. 1989. Public infrastructure and regional economic development: A simultaneous equations approach. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper no. 8910.
12.
Diamond, Jack
. 1990. Government expenditure and growth, Finance and Development27: 34-36.
13.
Eberts, Randall W.1987. Estimating the contribution of public capital stock to metropolitan manufacturing production. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper no. 8610 (revised).
14.
Eberts, Randall W.1990. Public infrastructure and regional economic development. Economic Review26: 15-27.
15.
Eberts, Randall W.1991. Some empirical evidence on the linkage between public infrastructure and local economic development. In Industry location and public policy, edited by Henry W. Herzog, Jr., and Alan M. Schlottmann, 83-96. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
16.
Ethier, Wilfred J.1982. National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. American Economic Review72: 389-405.
17.
Fernald, John G.1999. Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Economic Review89: 619-638.
18.
Ford, Robert
, and Pierre Poret. 1991. Infrastructure and private-sector productivity. OECD Economic Studies17: 63-89.
19.
Fox, William F.
, Henry W. Herzog, Jr., and Alan M. Schlottmann. 1989. Metropolitan fiscal structure and migration. Journal of Regional Science29: 523-536.
20.
Fox, William F.
, and Matthew Murray. 1990. Local public policies and interregional business development. Southern Economic Journal57: 413-427.
21.
Garcia-Mila, Teresa
. 1989. Some empirical evidence on government purchase multipliers. Economics Letters31: 375-380.
22.
Garcia-Mila, Teresa
, and Therese J. McGuire. 1992. The contribution of publicly provided inputs to states’ economies. Regional Service and Urban Economics22: 229-241.
23.
Glomm, Gerhard
, and B. Ravikumar. 1992. Public versus private investment in human capital endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy100: 813-834.
24.
Gramlich, Edward M.1994. Infrastructure investment: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature32: 1176-1196.
25.
Hansen, Niles
. 1965. Unbalanced growth and regional development. Western Economic Journal4: 3-14.
26.
Harmatuck, Donald J.1996. The influence of transportation infrastructure on economic development. Logistics and Transportation Review32: 63-76.
27.
Herzog, Henry W., Jr.
, and Alan M. Schlottmann. 1989. High-technology location and worker mobility in the U.S. In Knowledge and industrial organization, edited by Ake E. Andersson, David F. Batten, and Charlie Karlsson, 219-232. New York: Springer.
28.
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas
. 1994. Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics76: 12-21.
29.
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas
, and Mary E. Lovely. 1996. Scale economies, returns to variety, and the productivity of public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics26: 105-123.
30.
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas
, and Amy Ellen Schwartz. 1994. Infrastructure in a structural model of economic growth. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.
31.
Hulten, Charles R.
, and Robert M. Schwab. 1991. Public capital formation and the growth of regional manufacturing industries. National Tax Journal44: 121-134.
32.
Hulten, Charles R.
, and Robert M. Schwab. 1997. A fiscal federalism approach to infrastructure policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics27: 139-159.
33.
Hummelbrunner, Richard
. 1992. Technological change in rural areas: Implications for employment and local initiatives. In Businesses and jobs in the rural world, 164-183. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
34.
Israel, Arturo
. 1992. Issues for infrastructure management in the 1990s. World Bank Discussion Paper no 171.
35.
Jacoby, Jake
. 1994. An informational paper reporting a new highway construction employment estimation model. Mimeo.
36.
Lynde, Catherine
, and James Richmond. 1992. The role of public capital in production. Review of Economics and Statistics74: 37-44.
37.
Martin, Philippe
, and Carol A. Rogers. 1995. Trade effects of regional aid. In Collective articles on expanding membership of the European Union, edited by R. Baldwin, P. Haaparanta, and J. Kiander, 166-188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Morrison, Catherine J.
, and Amy E. Schwartz. 1991. State infrastructure and productive performance. Mimeo.
39.
Munnell, Alicia H.1990. How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance?New England Economic Review September-October, 11-32.
40.
Nadiri, Ishaq M.
, and Theofanis P. Mamuneas. 1991. The effects of public infrastructure and R&D capital on the cost structure and performance of U.S. manufacturing industries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 3887.
41.
Neill, Jon R.1996. Fueling the engine of growth with investment in infrastructure: A lesson from neoclassical growth theory. Journal of Macroeconomics18: 521-529.
42.
Nijkamp, Peter
. 1986. Infrastructure and regional development: A multidimensional policy analysis. Empirical Economics11: 1-21.
43.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
. 1993. Infrastructure policies for the 1990s. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
44.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
. 1997. Communications outlook 1997. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
45.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
. 1998. The OECD job strategy: Technology, productivity, and job creation: Best policy practices. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
46.
Rietveld, Piet
. 1989. Infrastructure and regional development: A survey of multiregional economic models. Annals of Regional Science23: 255-274.
47.
Rowley, Thomas D.
, and Shirley L. Porterfield. 1991. Can telecommunications help rural areas overcome obstacles to development?Rural Development Perspectives8: 2-6.
48.
Rubin, Laura S.1991. Productivity and the public capital stock: Another look. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Economic Activity Section Working Paper Series 118: 18.
49.
Scottish Highlands and Islands Development Board
. 1992. Public infrastructure and entrepreneurship: The case of the Scottish Highlands and Islands. In Businesses and jobs in the rural world, 45-59. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
50.
Shah, Anwar
. 1988. Public infrastructure and private sector profitability and productivity in Mexico. Policy, Planning, and Research working paper, Country Economics Department, The World Bank.
51.
Shah, Anwar
. 1992. Dynamics of public infrastructure, industrial productivity and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics74: 28-36.
52.
Stover, Mark E.1987. The role of infrastructure in the supply of housing. Journal of Regional Science27: 254-267.
53.
Tatom, John A.1991. Public capital and private sector performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review73: 3-15.
54.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
. 1995. Understanding rural America. Agriculture Information Bulletin no. 710. Available at http://www.usda.gov/.
55.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
. 1998. Agricultural transportation challenges for the 21st century: The future adequacy of rural roads. Available at http://www.usda.gov/.
56.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Information Infrastructure Task Force
. n.d. The national information infrastructure: Agenda for action. Available at http://nii.nist.gov/.
57.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration
. 1999. Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America, July.
58.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information and Rural Utilities Service (USDA) Administration
. 2000. Advanced telecommunications in rural America: The challenge of bringing broadband service to all Americans.
59.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics
. 1997. Transportation statistics. Annual report to Congress. Available at http://www.dot.gov/.
60.
Wylie, Peter J.1996. Infrastructure and Canadian economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics29: S350-S355.
