This study proposes and tests a model that applies the concept of restorative justice to the enactment of revenge and forgiveness in organizations. The model draws from theories of cognitive attribution and consistency, as well as more recent theories of revenge in organizations, to describe the process by which a personal offense triggers revenge and forgiveness cognitions and behavior. Attributions of blame were predicted to directly influence the contemplation of revenge and forgiveness strategies. In turn, these cognitions were hypothesized to be the immediate precursors of behavior. It was also predicted that the likableness of the offender would be positively associated with both revenge and forgiveness cognitions. Finally, blame attribution was expected to be influenced by offense severity. To test these predictions, a survey was administered to one hundred and eighty employees of a government agency. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the significance of the pathways in the model and compare its fit to theoretically plausible rivals. Although the theoretical model fit the data well, a less constrained alternative showed a superior fit. In both the theoretical model and less constrained alternative, all but two of the predicted pathways in the model were upheld. The implications of the findings for organizations are discussed and future research directions are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M.1979. Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
2.
Al-Mabuk, R. H., Enright, R. D., & Cardis, P. A.1995. Forgiveness education with parentally love deprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 34: 427–443.
3.
Anderson, J. G., & Gerbing, D. W.1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411–423.
4.
Axelrod, R.1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Bar-Elli, G., & Heyd, D.1986. Can revenge be just or otherwise be justified?Theoria, 52: 68–86.
6.
Baron, R. A.1988. The negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 199–207.
7.
Bentler, P. M.1990. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238–246.
8.
Bentler, P. M.1995. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (3): 400–404.
9.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G.1980. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588–606.
10.
Bies, R. J.1987. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
Bies, R .J. & Moag, J. S.1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations:43–53. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12.
Bies, R. J. & Tripp, T. M.1995. Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T .R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations:246–260. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. 1996. The many faces of revenge: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In J. Greenberg & S. L. Robinson (Chairs.), Antisocial behavior in organizations. Research, theory, and applications. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH, August 1996.
14.
Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Kramer, R. M.1997. At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations:18–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Bollen, K. A.1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
16.
Brown, R.1986. Social psychology. New York: Free Press.
17.
Brown, S. D., & Peachey, D. E.1984. Evaluation of the victim services program in the region of Waterloo, Ontario. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.
18.
Buss, A.1961. The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley.
19.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W.1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105.
20.
Cash, W. S., & Moss, A. J.1972. Optimum recall period for reporting persons injured in motor vehicle accidents. Vital and Health Statistics, 2 (50). Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
21.
Cloke, K.1993. Revenge, forgiveness and the magic of mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 11: 67–78.
22.
Cohen, J.1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Cohn, E. S., & Rabinowitz, V. C. 1980. Restitution: The egalitarian sentence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Psychology Society, Boston, June.
24.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T.1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
25.
Cloke, K.1993. Revenge, forgiveness and the magic of mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 11: 67–78.
26.
Crino, M. D.1994. Employee sabotage: A random or preventable phenomenon?Journal of Managerial Issues, 6: 311–330.
27.
Daly, J. P.1991. The effects of anger on negotiations in mergers and acquisitions. Negotiation Journal, 7 (1): 31–39.
28.
Deutsch, M.1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31: 137–150.
29.
Dion, K.1972. Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children’s transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24: 207–213.
30.
Efran, M. G.1974. The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8: 45–54.
31.
Enright, R. D.1994. Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness: Identity or reciprocity?Human Development, 37: 63–80.
32.
Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C.1992. Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 2: 99–114.
33.
Enright, R. D., Santos, M., & Al-Mabuk, R.1989. The adolescent as a forgiver. Journal of Adolescence, 12: 95–110.
34.
Fandt, P. M., Labig, C. E., & Urich, A. L.1990. Evidence and the liking bias: Effects on managers disciplinary actions. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3 (4): 253–265.
35.
Felson, R. B., & Tedeschi, J. T.1993. A social interactionist approach to violence: Cross-cultural applications. Violence and Victims, 8: 295–310.
36.
Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A.1980–1981. The emergence and transformation of disputes. Law and Society Review, 15: 631–654.
37.
Festinger, L. A.1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
38.
Fiske, S. T.1989. Examining the role of intent: Toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought: The limits of awareness, intention, and control:253–283. New York: Guilford Press.
39.
Fitzgibbons, R. P.1986. The cognitive and emotive uses of forgiveness in the treatment of anger. Psychotherapy, 23: 629–633.
40.
Folger, R., Davison, K., Dietz, J., & Robinson, S. 1996. Workplace violence and aggression as reactions to perceived injustice: They shoot bosses, don’t they? Unpublished manuscript, Tulane University, New Orleans.
41.
Gadacz, R. R.1986. Power and justice. Alberta Law Review, 24: 296–304.
42.
Hadyuk, L. A.1987. Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
Hampton, J.1988a. The retributive idea. In J. G. Murphy, & J. Hampton (Eds.), Forgiveness and mercy:111–161. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Hampton, J.1988b. Forgiveness, resentment, and hatred. In J. G. Murphy & J. Hampton (Eds.), Forgiveness and mercy:35–87. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Hebl, J., & Enright, R. D.1993. Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females. Psychotherapy, 30: 658-667.
46.
Heider, F.1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21: 107–112.
47.
Heider, F.1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
48.
Homans, G. C.1961. Social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
49.
Horney, K.1950. Neurosis and human growth. New York: Norton.
50.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M.1995. Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E.1965. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology vol. 2: 220–266. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D.1993. LISREL IV: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods (4th ed.). Moorseville, IN: Scientific Software.
53.
Kim, S. H., & Smith, R. H.1993. Revenge and conflict escalation. Negotiation Journal, 9: 37–43.
54.
Landy, D. & Anderson, E.1969. The influence of the character of the criminal and victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5: 141–152.
55.
Lerner, M. J.1977. The justice motive in social behavior: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45: 1–52.
56.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T.1978. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85: 1030–1051.
57.
Leventhal, G. S.1976. Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut (Ed.), Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown NJ: General Learning Press.
58.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R.1986. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
59.
MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Leandre, R. F.1993. The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 114 (1): 185–199.
60.
Marongui, P., & Newman, G.1987. Vengence: The fight against injustice. New Jersey: Roman and Littlefield.
61.
McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L., Jr.1995. Promoting forgiveness: A comparison of two brief psychoeducational group interventions with a waiting-list control. Counseling and Values, 40: 55–66.
62.
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D.1992. Distributive and procedural justice on predictions of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3): 626–637.
63.
Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N.1990. What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30: 13–149.
64.
Miller, D., & Vidmar, N.1981. The social psychology of punishment reactions. In S. Lerner & M. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior:145–167. New York: Plenum Press.
65.
Monahan, F.1949. Women in crime. New York: Washburn.
66.
Montville, J. V.1993. The healing function of conflict resolution. In D. J. D. Sandole & H. van der Merwe (Eds.), Conflict resolution: Theory and practice:112–128. New York: Manchester University Press.
67.
Morrill, C.1992. Vengeance among executives. Virginia Review of Sociology, 1: 51–76.
68.
Murphy, J. G.1988. Forgiveness and resentment. In J. G. Murphy & J. Hampton (Eds.), Forgiveness and mercy:14–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J.1988. Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Netemeyer, R., Johnston, M., & Burton, S.1990. Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 148–157.
71.
Newcomb, T. M.1968. Interpersonal balance. In R. E. Abelson et al. (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
72.
Peachey, D. E.1989. What people want from mediation. In K. Kressel, D. G. Pruitt & Associates (Eds.), Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention:300–321. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73.
Pedhazur, E. J.1997. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
74.
Pingleton, J. P.1989. The role and function of forgiveness in the psychotherapeutic process. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17: 27–35.
75.
Podsakoff, P. M.1982. Determinants of a supervisor’s use of rewards and punishments: A literature review and suggestions for further research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29: 58–83.
76.
Podsakoff, P. M., Williams, L .J., & Todor, W. D.1986. Effects of organizational formalization on alienation among professionals and nonprofessionals. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 820–831.
77.
Power, F. C.1994. Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness: Identity or reciprocity?: Commentary. Human Development, 37: 81–85.
78.
Sampson, E. E.1975. On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31: 45–64.
79.
Sanchez, J. I., Korbin, W. P., & Viscarra, D. M.1995. Corporate support in the aftermath of a natural disaster: Effects on employee strains. Academy of Management Journal, 8 (2): 504–521.
80.
Shaver, K. G.1985. The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
81.
Skarlicki, D. O., & Folger, R.1997. Retalitation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82 (3): 434–443.
82.
Soloman, R. C.1990. A passion for justice: Emotions and the origins of the social conduct. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
83.
Strasser, J. A. 1984. The relation of general forgiveness and forgiveness type to reported health in the elderly. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
84.
Stuckless, N., & Goranson, R.1992. The vengeance scale: Development of a measure of attitudes toward revenge. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7: 25–42.
85.
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M.1982. Asking questions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
86.
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M.1974. Response effects in surveys: A review and synthesis. Chicago: Aldine.
87.
Swingle, P.1969. Ethnic factors in interpersonal bargaining. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 3 (2): 136–146.
Terris, W., & Jones, J.1982. Psychological factors related to employees’ theft in the convenience store industry. Psychological Reports, 1: 1219–1238.
90.
Thurstone, L. L.1947. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
91.
Trainer, M. F. 1981. Forgiveness: Intrinsic, role-expected, expedient, in the context of divorce. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston.
92.
Umbreit, M. S.1989. Crime victims seeking fairness, not revenge: Toward restorative justice. Federal Probation, 53: 52–57.
93.
Vecchio, R. P.1995. It’s not easy being green: Jealousy and envy in the workplace. In G. R. Ferrris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
94.
Vidmar, N., & Crinklaw, L.1974. Assignment of responsibility for an accident: A methodological and conceptual critique. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 6: 112–130.
95.
Wade, S. H. 1989. The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, California.
96.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E.1994. An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications to organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9 (3): 323–331.
97.
Wong, W. P. T., & Weiner, B.1981. When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40: 650–663.
98.
Woodman, T. 1991. The role of forgiveness in marital adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller, Theological Seminary, California.
99.
Wortman, C. B.1976. Casual attributions and personal control. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
