Abstract
This article contrasts the composite view of the relationship between multidimensional constructs and their facets/dimensions with the factor view. The composite view assumes that facets are components of the composite constructs, while the factor view assumes that facets are manifestations of latent constructs. An empirical study is used to illustrate the fact that these two views will lead to different conclusions about the relationship of constructs in covariance structure analyses. It is suggested that researchers must examine the theoretical basis of their topic in order to determine whether the factor or composite view is more suitable for the multidimensional construct of interest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
