This research note examines the impact of individuals and institutions on research in entrepreneurship for the period since the Academy of Management accorded division status to entrepreneurship in 1987. It includes research in publications rated appropriate quality or above as entrepreneurship research outlets by MacMillan’s (1993) survey. Nineteen different publications, containing 472 entrepreneurship articles were reviewed, Rankings adjusted and unadjusted for journal quality are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, W. & McKenzie, P. (1978). Leading accounting departments revisited. The Accounting Review, 53: 135-138.
2.
Barman, S., Tersine. R.J. & Buckley, M.R. (1991). An empirical assessment of the perceived relevance and quality of POM-related journals by academicians. Journal ofOperations Management, 10(2): 194-212.
3.
Bazley, .I. & Nikolai, L. (1975). A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. The Accounting Review, 50: 605-610.
4.
Benjamin, J. & Brenner, V. (1974). Perceptions of journal quality. The Accounting Review, 49: 360-362.
5.
Coe, R.K. & Weinstock, I. (1984). Evaluating the management journals: A second look. Academy ofManagement Journal, 27(3): 660-666.
6.
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing - Its theory and application in science, technology, und humanities. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7.
Hawkins, R.G., Ritter, L.S. & Walter, I. (1973). What economists think of their journals. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 8/(4): 1017-1032.
8.
Heck, J. & Cooley, P. (1988). Most frequent contributors to the finance literature. Financial Management, (Autumn): 100-108.
9.
Henry, W. & Burch. E. (1974). Institutional contributions to scholarly journals of business. Journal of Business, 47: 56-66.
10.
Liebowitz, S.J. & Palmer, J.P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 22(1): 77-88.
11.
Macmillan, I.C. (1989a). Editor’s note: Toward a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(5): 289-290.
12.
Macmillan, I.C. (1989b). Delineating a forum for business policy scholars. Struregic Management Journal, 10(4): 391-395.
13.
Macmillan, I.C. (1991). Editor’s note: Delineating a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(2): 83-87.
14.
Macmillan, I.C. (1993). The emerging forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 377-381.
15.
MacMillan, I.C. & Stem, I. (1987). Defining a forum for business policy scholars. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 183-186.
16.
Moore, W. J. (1972). The relative quality of economics journals: A suggested rating system. Western Economic Journal, 10(2): 156-169.
17.
Morrison, A.J. & Inkpen. A.C. (1991). An analysis of significant contributions to the international business literature. Journal of InternationalBusiness Studies, 22(1): 143-152.
18.
Ricks, D. (1985). International business research: Past, present, and future. Journal of International Business Studies, 16(2): 1-4.
19.
Sharplin, A.D. & Mabry, R.H. (1985). Therelative importance of journals used in management research: An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38(2): 139-149.
