Statistical methods play an important role in salary discrimination litigation. Regression analysis is the most widely used method in this application. In regression analysis, group differences in salary are evaluated among employees who have been matched on measured “merit” variables (e.g., years of job experience). Difficulties often arise because important merit variables may be unmeasured, or because the available measures of merit are fallible. An alternative approach in this case lies in the use of several latent variable path models that have been proposed for the salary problem (Birnbaum, 1979; McFatter, 1987). The theoretical and practical implications of these models are discussed. The use of the models is illustrated in real data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ali, M.M. & Silver, J.L. (1985). Tests for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions under heteroscedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80: 730-735.
2.
Birnbaum, M.H. (1979). Procedures for the detection and correction of salary inequities. Pp. 121-144 in T.R. Pezzullo & BE. Brittingham (Eds.), Salary equity. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.
3.
Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations_ with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing mode1 fit. Pp. 136-162 in K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Conway, D.A. & Roberts, H.V. (1983). Reverse regression, fairness, and employment discrimination. Journal of Business and Economic Statistic, 1: 75-85.
Draper, N. & Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis, (2nd ed.) New YorkWiley.
9.
Finkelstein, M.O. & Levin, B. (1990). Statistics for lawyers. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Gastwirth, J.L. (1988). Statistical reasoning in law und public policy. Boston: Academic Press.
11.
Goldberger, AS. (1984). Reverse regression and salary discrimination. Journal of Human Resources, 19: 293-318.
12.
Gollob, H.F. (1984). Detecting sex bias in salaries. American Psychologist, 39448-451.
13.
Gregory, K.L. (1991). A reconsideration of bias in employment testing from the perspective of factorial invariance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
14.
Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81: 945-970.
15.
Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL VII user’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
16.
Levin, B. & Robbins, H. (1983). Urn models for regression analysis, with applications to employment discrimination studies. Law and Contemporary Problems, 46: 247-267.
17.
Marascuilo, L.A. & Levin, J.R. (1983). Multivariate statistics in the social sciences: A researcher’s guide. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
18.
Mauro, R. (1990). Understanding L.O.V.E. (Left Out Variables Error): A method for estimating the effects of omitted variables. Psychological Bulletin, 108: 314-329.
19.
McDonald, R.P. & Marsh, H.W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 247-255.
20.
McFatter, R.M. (1987). Use of latent variable models for detecting discrimination in salaries. Psychological Bulletin, 101: 120-125.
21.
Meredith, W. & Millsap, R.E. (1992). On the misuse of manifest variables in the detection of measurement bias. Psychometrika, 57: 289-311.
22.
Millsap, R.E. (1995). Measurement invariance, predictive invariance, and the duality paradox. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30: 517-605.
23.
Millsap, R.E. & Everson, H. (1991). Confirmatory measurement model comparisons using latent means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26: 419-497.
24.
Millsap, R.E. & Meredith, W. (1994). Statistical evidence in salary discrimination studies: Nonparametric inferential conditions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29: 339-364.
25.
Millsap, R.E. & Meredith, W. (1992). Inferential conditions in the statistical detection of measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16: 389-402.
26.
Peterson, D.W. (1986). Measurement error and regression analysis in employment cases. Pp. 107-131 in D.H. Kaye & M.H. Aicken (Eds.), Statistical methods in discrimination litigration. New York: Dekker.
