Pressures for early consensus during group decision processes often lead to poor choices. However, consensus as an outcome of group decision processes is often desirable for implementing choices. We propose and test hypotheses that structured decision making techniques designed to enhance the expression of cognitive conflict will, paradoxically, (1) strengthen group consensus about and individual acceptance of the group S eventual choices, and (2) increase member satisfaction with the group. Faced with a realistic managerial scenario, nineteen groups in this study deliberated using the structured, conflict-enhancing dialectical inquiry (DI) approach; nineteen used the consensus (C) approach. Group consensus on the decision, individual acceptance of the decision, and member satisfaction with the group were higher in the DI than in the C conditions. We discuss implications for group decision aids and for future laboratory and field studies of group consensus on a course of action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennis, W G. & Shepherd, H.H. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9: 415-437.
2.
Bettenhausen, K.L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2): 345-381.
3.
Bourgeois, L.J. III. (1980). Performance and consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1: 227-248.
4.
Bourgeois, L.J. III. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 548-573.
5.
Brodwin, D.R. & Bourgeois, L.J. III. (1984). Five steps to strategic action. California Management Review, 26(Spring): 176-190.
6.
Castore, C.H. & Mumighan, J.K. (1978). Determinants of support for group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22: 75-92.
7.
Cateora, P.R. (1990). Harvey Wallbanger popcorn. Pp. 730-733 in P.R. Cateora, International marketing, 7th ed.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
8.
Cosier, R.A. & Rose, R.L. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19: 378-391.
9.
Cosier, R.A. & Schwenk, C.R. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 4: 69-74.
10.
David, F.R., Pearce, J.A. & Randolph, W.A. (1989). Linking technology and structure to enhance group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 233-241.
11.
Dess, G.G. (1987). Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 259-277.
12.
Dess, G.G. & Keats, B.W. (1987). Environmental assessment and organizational performance: An exploratory field study. Academy of Management Proceedings: 21-25.
13.
Evan, W.M. (1965). Conflict and performance in R&D organizations. Industrial Management Review, 7: 37-46.
14.
Feldman, D.C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9: 47-53.
15.
Fisher, B.A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision making. Speech Monographs, 37: 53-66.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 108-119.
18.
Folger, R. & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Pp. 141-183 in K.R. Rowland & G.R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J. & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 2253-2261.
20.
George, J.M. (1990). Personality, affect and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107-116.
21.
Gero, A. (1985). Conflict avoidance in consensual decision processes. Small Group Behavior, 16: 487-499.
22.
Greenberg, J. & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. Pp. 235-256 in P.B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23.
Grinyer, P. & Norburn, D. (1975). Planning for existing markets: Perceptions of executives. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 138: 70-97.
24.
Hackman, J.R. (1990). Creating more effective work groups in organizations. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work [and those that don’t]: Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hare, A.P. (1976). Handbook of smallgroup research. New York: Free Press.
27.
Hayes, L. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83: 628-648.
28.
Hedberg, B.L.T., Nystrom, P.C. & Starbuck, W.H. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 41-65.
29.
Hoffman, L. R., Harburg, E. & Maier, N.R.F. (1962). Differences and disagreement as factors in creative group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64: 206-214.
30.
Hoffman, L. & Maier, N.R.F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solving by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62: 401-407.
31.
Innami, I. (1992). Comparative effectiveness and working mechanism of the consensual conflict resolution, devils advocacy and dialectical inquiry interventions. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Las Vegas.
32.
Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Jehn, K.A. (1991). Benefits and detriments of group conflict. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Miami.
35.
Kelman, H.C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2: 51-60.
36.
Kelman, H.C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25: 57-78.
37.
Levine, J.M. & Moreland, R. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 585-634.
38.
Lott, A.J. & Lott, B.E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64: 259-309.
39.
Mason, R.O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15: 403-414.
Miller, K.I. & Monge, P.E. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 121-753.
42.
Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93: 23-32.
43.
Pace, R.C. (1990). Personalized and depersonalized conflict in small group discussions: An examination of differentiation. Small Group Research, 21: 19-96.
44.
Peters, T.J. (1988). Thriving on chaos. New York: Knopf.
45.
Priem, R.L. (1990). Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 469-478.
46.
Priem, R.L. & Price, K.H. (1991). Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making. Group and Organization Studies, 16: 206-225.
47.
Putnam, L.L. (1986). Conflict in group decision making. Pp 175-196 in R.Y. Hirokowa & MS. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rahim, M.A. (1983). Measurement of organizational conflict. Journal of General Psychology, 109: 188-199.
50.
Reicken, H.W. (1952). Some problems of consensus development. Rural Sociology, 17: 245-252.
51.
Rosenberg, M. (1968). ?“/re logic of survey analysis. New York: Basic Books.
52.
Schweiger, D.M. & Finger, P.A. (1984). The comparative effectiveness of dialectical inquiry and devil’s advocacy: The impact of task biases on previous research findings. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 335-350.
53.
Schweiger, D.M. & Sandberg, W.R. (1989). The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 31-43.
54.
Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R. & Ragan, J.W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 51-71.
55.
Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R. & Rechner, P. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 745-772.
56.
Schwenk, C.R. (1988). The essence of strategic decision making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
57.
Schwenk, C.R. (1990). Effects of devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47: 161-176.
58.
Semler, R. (1989). Managing without managers: How an unorthodox company makes money by avoiding decisions, rules, and executive authority. Harvard Business Review: 76-84.
59.
Shaw, M.E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of smallgroup behavior, 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
Shea, G.P. & Guzzo, R.A. (1987). Groups as human resources. Pp. 323-356 in K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
61.
Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
62.
Stasser, G., Kerr, N.L. & Davis, J.H. (1980). Influence processes in decision-making groups-a modeling approach. Pp. 431-477 in P.B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63.
Staw, B.M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 274.
Steiner, I.D. (1982). Heuristic models of groupthink. Pp. 503-524 in M. Brandstatter, J.H. Davis & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making. New York: Academic Press.
66.
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P. & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Application and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45: 120-133.
67.
Tjosvold, D. (1987). Participation: A close look at its dynamics. Journal of Management, 13: 739-750.
68.
Tjosvold, D. & Field, R.H.G. (1985). Effect of concurrence, controversy, and consensus on group decision making. Journal of Social Psychology, 125(3): 355-363.
69.
Torrance, E.P. (1957). Group decision making and disagreement. Social Forces, 35: 314-318.
70.
Triandis, H.C., Hall, E.R. & Ewen, R.B. (1965). Member homogeneity and dyadic creativty. Human Relations, 18: 33-54.
71.
Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63: 384-389.
72.
Vroom, V.H. & Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press.
73.
Wall, V.D. & Nolan, L.L. (1987). Small group conflict: A look at equity, satisfaction, and styles of conflict management. Small Group Behavior, 18: 188-211.
74.
Watson, R., De Sanctis, G. & Poole, MS. (1988). Using G.D.S.S. to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12: 463-478.
75.
White, S., Dittrich, J. & Lang, J. (1980). The effects of group decision making process and problem situation complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 428-440.
76.
Whyte, G. (1989). Groupthink reconsidered. Academy of Management Review, 14: 40-56.
77.
Wooldridge, B. Jr & Floyd, S.W. (1990). The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 231-241.
