Historically, the relationship between business firms and government has usually been approached in terms of its effects on the process of representative democracy (i.e., the implications of business political activity for the functioning of government). More recently, perspectives on business-government relations have developed within a managerial framework [i.e., from the viewpoint of the corporation and the manager]. This article discusses the consequences of public policies for the competitive environment of the firm, which provides one explanation for political behavior. Firm-level responses include both strategic adaptation and attempts to influence public policy. It discusses a variety of research approaches to understanding the firm S strategic use of public policy processes, as well as suggestions for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astley, W.G. & Fombrun, C.J. (1983). Collective strategy: Social ecology of organizational environments. Academy of Management Review, 8: 516-587.
2.
Barrows, D.S. & Morris, S. (1989). Managing public policy issues. Long Range Planning, 22: 66-73.
3.
Baysinger, B.D. (1984). Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9: 248-258.
4.
Bimbaum, P.H. (1984). The choice of strategic alternatives under increasing regulation in high technology companies. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 489-510.
5.
Blau, R.T. & Harris, R.G. (1992). Strategic uses of regulation: The case of line-of-business restrictions in the U. S. communications industry. Pp. 161-189 in J. Post (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance andpolicy, Vol. 13. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
Boddewyn, J.J. & Brewer, T.L. (1994). International business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19: 119-143.
7.
Brenner, S.N. (1980). Corporate political activity: An exploratory study in a developing industry. Pp. 197-236 in L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8.
Buchanan, J., Tollison, R. & Tullock, G. (Eds.). (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Press.
9.
Byrnes, J. (1985). Diversification strategies for regulated and deregulated industries. Boston: Lexington Books.
10.
Carter, N.M. (1990). Small firm adaptation: responses of physicians’ organizations to regulatory and competitive uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 307-333.
11.
Clawson, D. (1993). Review of Mizruchi, The structure of corporate political action: Interfirm relations and their consequences. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 332-334.
12.
Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A. & Bearden, J. (1986). The logic of business unity: Corporate contributions to the 1980 congressional elections. American Sociological Review, 51: 797-811.
13.
Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A. & Bearden, J. (1992). Money talks: PACs and political influence. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Conference Board. (1988). Managing federal government regulations. New York: Conference Board.
15.
Cory, K.D. & McWiiliams, A. (1994). Raising rivals’ costs: An application of resource-based theory. Unpublished working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
16.
Dean, T.J. & Brown, R.L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Managemenf Journal, 38: 288-303.
17.
Derthick, M. & Quirk, P. (1985). The politics of deregulation. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
18.
Drtina, R.E. & Herbert, T.T. (1989). Formulating the firm’s political action strategy: A corporate budgeting perspective. Akron Business and Economic Review, 20: 21-37.
19.
Dutton, J.E. & Ottensmeyer, E. (1987). Strategic issue management systems: Forms, functions, and contexts. Academy of Management Review, 12: 355-365.
20.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 24: 532-550.
21.
Epstein, E.M. (1980). Business political activity: Research approaches and analytical issues. Pp. 1-55 in L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CTJAI Press.
22.
Epstein, E.M. (1984) PACs and the modern political process. Pp. 399-496 in B. Bock, H.J. Goldschmid, I.M. Millstein & F.M. Scherer [E&l, The impact of the modern corporation. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
Gale, J. & Buchholz, R.A. (1987). The political pursuit of competitive advantage: What business can gain from government. Pp. 31-42 in A. Marcus, A. Kaufman & D. Beam (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy: Perspectives from industry and academia. New York: Quorum Books.
24.
Getz, K.A. (1991). Selecting corporate political tactics. Pp. 242-273 in B. Mitnick (Ed.), Corporate political agency. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Greening, D.W. & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 467-498.
26.
Grier, K.B., Munger, M.C. & Roberts, B.E. (1991). The industrial organization of corporate political participation. Southern Economic Journal57: 727-738.
27.
Grier, K.B., Munger, M.C. & Roberts, B.E. (1994). The determinants of industry political activity, 1978-1986. American Political Science Review, 88: 911-926.
28.
Harris, R.A. (1989). Politicized management: The changing face of business in American politics. Pp. 261-285 in R.A. Harris & S.M. Milkis (Eds.), Remaking American politics. San Francisco: Westview Press.
29.
Heinz, J.P. (1993). The hollow core: Private interests in national policy making. Cambridge: Harvard.
30.
Hillman, A. & Keim, G. (1995). International variation in the business government interface: Some institutional and organizational considerations. Academy of Management Review, in press.
31.
Jacobs, D., Useem, M. & Zald, M.N. (1991). Firms, industries and politics. Pp. 141-165 in P. Washburn (Ed.), Research in political sociology, Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32.
Jick, T. (1979). Mixing quantitative and qualiative methods: triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602-611.
33.
Keim, G. (1985). Corporate grassroots programs in the 1980s. California Management Review, 28: 110-123.
34.
Keim, G.D. & Baysinger, B. (1988). The efficacy of business political activity: Competitive considerations in a principal-agent context. Journal of Management, 14: 163-180.
35.
Lehne, R. (1993). Industry and politics: United Slates in comparative perspective. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
36.
Lenway, S.A. (1985). The politics of U.S. international trade: protection, expansion and escape. Boston: Pitman.
37.
Lenway, S.A. & Rehbein, K. (1991). Leaders, followers, and free riders: An empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 893-905.
38.
Leone, R.A. (1981). Government regulation of business: Developing the managerial perspective. Boston: Harvard University.
39.
Leone, R.A. (1986). Whoprofits: Winners, losers and government regulation. New York: Basic Books.
40.
Lindblom, C.E. (1977). Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Lowi, T.J. (1969). The end of liberalism. New York: W.W. Norton.
42.
Mahon, J.F. (1983). Corporate political strategies: An empirical study of chemical firm responses to superfund legislation. Pp. 143-182 in L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate socialperformanceand policy, Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
43.
Mahon, J.F. (1989). Corporate political strategy. Business in the Contemporary World, (August): 50-62.
44.
Mahon, J.F. (1993). Corporate political sculpting. Pp. 187-212 in B. M. Mitnick (Eds.), Corporate political agency: The construction of competition in public affairs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Marcus, A.A. & Kaufman, A.M. (1988). The continued expansion of the corporate public-affairs function. Business Horizons, (March-April): 58-62.
46.
Marcus, A., Kaufman A. & Beam, D. (1987). Business strategy and public policy: Perspectives from industry and academia. New York: Quorum Books.
47.
Marsh, S.J. (1994). An exploratory study of the impact of anti-dumping actions on the performance of U.S. firms. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Dallas, Texas.
48.
Marx, T. G. (1990). Strategic planning for public affairs. Long Range Planning, 23: 9-16.
49.
McCaffrey, D.P. (1982). Corporate resources and regulatory pressures: Toward explaining a discrepancy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 398-419.
50.
McCaffrey, D.P. (1983). Regulation: Notes on a stochastic process perspective. Pp. 55-69 in R.H. Hall & R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy. London: Sage.
51.
McCormick, R.E. (1989). A review of the economics of regulation: The political process. Pp. 16-37 in R.E. Meiners & B. Yandle (Eds.), Regulation and the Reagan era. New York: Holmes and Meier.
52.
Mitnick, B.M. (1981). The strategic uses of regulation and deregulation. Business Horizons, 24: 71-83.
53.
Mitnick, B.M. (1991). Chasing elephants among chickens on a tilted field: Pluralism and political contestability in the work of Edwin Epstein. Pp. 181-206 in J. Posr (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
54.
Mitnick, B.M. (1993). Corporate political agency. Newbury Park: Sage.
55.
Mizruchi, M.S. (1992). Thestructure of corporate political action: Interfirm relations and their consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Mizruchi, M.S. & Koenig, T. (1986). Economic sources of corporate political consensus: An examination of interindustry relations. American Sociological Review, 51: 482-491.
57.
Neustadtl, A. & Clawson, D. (1988). Corporate political groupings: Does ideology unify business political behavior?American Sociological Review, 53: 172-190.
58.
Oster, S.M. (1982). The strategic use of regulatory investment by industry subgroups. Economic Inquiry, 20: 604-618.
59.
Ottensmeyer, E.J. & Dutton, J.E. (1989). Interpreting environments and taking action: Types and characteristics of strategic issue management systems. Pp. 203-231 in C.C. Snow (Eds.), Strategy.organization design, and human resource management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
60.
Pashigian, B.P. (1984). The effect of environmental regulation on optimal plant size and factor shares. Journal of Law and Economics, 27: 1-27-
61.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
62.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.
63.
Post, J.E., Murray, E.A., Dickie, R.B. & Mahon, J.F. (1982). The public affairs function in American corporations: Development and relations with corporate planning. Long Range Planning, 15: 12-21.
64.
Preston, L.E. (1986). Business and public policy. Journal of Management, 12: 261-276.
65.
Reagan, M.D. (1987). Regulation: The politics of policy. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
66.
Rehbein, K. & Lenway, S. (1994). Determining an industry’s political effectiveness with the U.S. International Trade Commission, Business and Society, 33: 270-292.
67.
Russo, M.V. (1992). Power plays: Regulation, diversification, and backward integration in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 13-21.
68.
Russo, M.V. (1993). On collective strategy in the public policy domain. PD. 353-374 in P. Shrivastava.A. Huff & J. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, Vol. 9. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
69.
’ Salamon, L.M. & Siegfried, J.J. (1977). Economic power and political influence: The impact of industry structure on public policy. The American Political Science Review, 71: 1026-1043.
70.
Salop, S.C., Scheffman, D.T. & Schwartz, W. (1984). A bidding analysis of special interest regulation: Raising rivals’ costs in a rent-seeking society. Pp. 102-127 in R.A. Rogowsky & B. Yandle (Eds.), The political economy of regulation: Private interests in the regulatory process. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
71.
Schlozman, K.L. & Tierney, J.T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
72.
Shaffer, B. (1992). Regulation, competition, and strategy: The case of automobile fuel economy standards, 1974-1991. Pp. 191-218 in J. Post (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol. 13. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
73.
Shaffer, B. (1993). Thepolitical strategies of vertically related firms: Auto manufacturers and auto dealers. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
74.
Shepsle, K.A. (1980). The private use of public interest. Society, 17: 35-41.
75.
Sorauf, F.J. (1992). Inside campaign finance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
76.
Staber, U. (1985). A population perspective on collective action as an organizational form: The case of trade associations. Pp. 181-219 in S. Bacharah & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations, Vo1.4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77.
Staber, U. & Aldrich, H. (1983). Trade association stability and public policy. Pn. 163-178 in R.H. Hall & R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy. London:-Sage.
78.
Stieglitz, H. (1985). Chief executives view their jobs: today and tomorrow. ReDott #871. The Conference Board; New York:
79.
Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 2: 3-21.
80.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
81.
Ungson, G.R., James, C. & Spicer, B.H. (1985). The effects of regulatory agencies on organizations in wood products and high technology/electronics industries. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 426-445.
82.
Useem, M. (1980). Corporations and the corporate elite. Annual Review of Sociology, 6: 41-77.
83.
Vogel, D. (1984). A case study of clean air legislation 1967-1981. Pp. 309-386 in B. Bock (Eds.), The impact of the modern corporation. New York: Columbia University Press.
84.
Walker, J.L. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America: patrons, professions, and social movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
85.
Wartick, S.L. & Mahon, J.F. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct. Business and Society, 33: 293-311.
Washington representatives 1991: who does what for whom in the nations capital. (1991). Washington, DC: Columbia Books (annual).
88.
Wood, D.J. (1986). Strategic uses of public policy: business and government in theprogressive era. Boston: Pitman.
89.
Wood, D.J. (1991). Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 17: 383-406.
90.
Yoffie, D.B. (1987). Corporate strategies for political action: A rational model. Pp. 43-60 in A. Marcus, A. Kaufman & D. Beam (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy: Perspectives from industry and academia. New York: Quorom Books.
91.
Zeithaml, C.P., Keim, G.D. & Baysinger, B.D. (1988). Toward an integrated strategic management process: An empirical view of corporate political strategy. Pp. 377-393 in J.H. Grant (Ed.), Strategic management frontiers. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
