Causal mapping has long been valued as a tool for exploring individuals’ idiosyncratic beliefs. in this paper we do three things to make these benefits more utilizable by researchers. First, by detailing a replicable elicitation technique, we lay the ground for systematic and objective comparison of these beliefs: Systematic analysis and comparison require systematic elicitation. Secondly, through a careful analysis of what a causal map means, we have been able to refine a way of comparing maps which uses all of the available information within the maps and is objective in the sense that all subjective aspects of the method are made explicit (e.g., the pool of constructs, the interpretation of missing information, etc.). Thirdly, we discuss and extend various tools for analyzing the distance based measures which the comparison yields. In addition, a brief example of the use of the method is sketched.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackermann, Fran, Cropper, Steve & Eden, Colin. (1992). Graphics COPE users guide’, Report. Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
2.
Axelrod, Robert (Ed.) (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Barr, Pamela S., Stimpert, J.L. & Huff, Anne S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 15-36.
4.
Bellman, R.E. & Zadeh, L.A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science.
5.
Bougon, Michel G. & Komocar, John M. (1990). Directing strategic change: A dynamic wholistic approach. Pp. 135-163 in Anne S. Huff (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought. New York: Wiley.
6.
Bougon, Michel G., Weick, Karl E. & Binkhorst, Din. (1977). Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht jazz orchestra. Academy of Management Review, 22: 606-639.
7.
Breiger, Ronald L., Boorman, Scott A. & Arabie, Phipps. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12: 328-383.
8.
Child, John, Markóczy, Lívia & Cheung, Tony. (1994). Managerial adaptation in Chinese and Hungarian strategic alliances with culturally distinct partners. In Sally Stewart (Ed.), Joint ventures in the People’s Republic of China, Vol. 4 of Advances in Chinese industrial studies. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
de Leeuw, Jan & Heiser, William. (1982). Theory of multidimensional scaling. Pp. 285-316 in P.R. Krishnaiah & L.N. Kanal (Eds.), Classification, pattern recognition and reduction of dimensionality, Vol. 2 ofHandbook of statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10.
Eden, Colin. (1992). On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies.
11.
Eden, Colin, Ackermann, Fran & Cropper, Steve. (1992). The analysis of cause maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 309-324.
Ford, Jeffrey D. & Hegarty, W. Harvey. (1984). Decision makers’ beliefs about the causes and effects of structure: an exploratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 271-291.
14.
Füstös, László & Kovács, Erzsébet. (1989). A számítógépes adatelemzés statisztikai módszerei (Computational methods for statistical data analysis). Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó
15.
Ginsberg, Ari. (1992). Review of A.S. Huff 1990 Mapping strategic thought. Academy of Management Review, 17: 145-148.
16.
Hall, Roger I. (1984). The natural logic of management policy making: Its implications for the survival of an organization. Management Science, 30(8): 905-927.
Huff, Anne S. (Ed.) (1990). Mapping strategic thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Kim, Jae-On & Mueller, Charles W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. London: Sage.
21.
Langfield-Smith, Kim M. & Wirth, Andrew. (1992). Measuring differences between cognitive maps. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(12): 1135-1150.
22.
Laukkanen, Mauri. (1992). Comparative cause mapping of management cognitions: A computer database method for natural data. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration Publications.
23.
Markóczy, Lívia. (1994). Barriers to shared belief: The role of managerial characteristics, environmental factors, and strategic interest. Paper presented at Meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas.
24.
Markóczy, Lívia. (forthcoming). States and belief states. International Journal of Human Resource Management.
25.
Markóczy, Lívia & Goldberg, Jeff. (1992). On identifying managerial types based of beliefs about business. Researchpaper Z7/92, Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
26.
McKeithen, Kathrine B., Reitman, Judith S., Rueter, Henry H. & Hirtle, Stephen C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 307-325.
27.
Roberts, Fred S. (1976). The questionnaire method. In Robert Axelrod (Ed.), Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Ross, Robert T. (1934). Optimum orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25: 375-382.
29.
Sandy, Robert. (1989). Statistics for business and economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Siegel, Sidney. (1956). Nonparametric statistics: for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Thulasiraman, K. & Swamy, M.N.S. (1992). Graphs: Theory and algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
Tversky, Amos. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychology Review, 84: 327-352.
33.
Wish, Myron & Carroll, J. Douglas. (1982). Multidiminsional scaling and its applications. Pp. 317-345 in P.R. Krishnaiah & L.N. Kanal (Eds.), Classification, pattern recognition and reduction of dimensionality, Vol. 2 of Handbook of statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
