We analyze the correlates and characteristics of grievance procedures covering nonunion employees in 19.5 private firms. These remedial voice procedures tend to exist in larger and completely nonunion firms that place a high value on their human resources. Although these procedures guarantee employees the right to file grievances and contain considerable procedural formality, most of them give management the lion S share of process control and decision control over employee complaints.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aram, J. D. & Salipante, P. F. Jr. (1981). An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict. Academy of ManagementReview, 6: 197-204.
2.
Berenbeim, R. (1980). Nonunion complaint systems: A corporate appraisal, Research report no. 770, Conference Board, New York.
3.
Boroff, K. (1990). Loyalty-A correlate of exit, voice, or silence? Pp. 307-314 in J. F. Burton, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the forty-second annual meeting. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
4.
Bureau of National Affairs. (1979). Policies for unorganized employees. Personnel Policies Forum Survey No. 125, Burea of National Affairs, Washington, DC, April.
5.
Child, J. (1973). Predicting and understanding organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18: 168-185.
6.
Coombe, J. (1984). Peer review: The emerging successful application. Employee Relations Law Journal, 9: 659-671.
7.
Dalton, D. R. & Todor, W. D. (1982). Win, lose, draw: The grievance process in practice. Personnel Administrator, 26(3): 25-31.
8.
Delaney, J. T. (1986). Impasses and teacher contract outcomes. Industrial Relations, 25: 45-55.
9.
Delaney, J. T. & Feuille, P. (1992). The determinants of nonunion grievance and arbitration procedures. Pp. 529-538 in J. F. Burton, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual meting. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
10.
Delaney, J. T., Lewin, D. & Ichniowski, C. (1989). Human resource policies and practices in American firms, BLMR 137. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs.
11.
Dertouzous, J. N., Holland, E. & Ebener, P. (1988). The legal and economic consequences of wrongful termination. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
12.
Dilts, D. A. & Deitsch, C. R. (1989). Arbitration win/loss rates as a measure of arbitrator neutrality. Arbitration Journal, 44(3): 42-47.
13.
Donohue, J. J. & Siegelman, P. (1991). The changing nature of employment discrimination litigation. Stanford Law Review, 43: 983-1033.
14.
Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95: 1401-1440.
15.
Ewing, D. W. (1989). Justice on the job: Resolving grievances in the nonunion workplace. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L. & Sarat, A. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming Low&Society Review, 15: 631-654.
17.
Feuille, P. & Delaney, J. T. (1992). The individual pursuit of organizational justice: Grievance procedures in nonunion workplaces. Pp. 187-232 in G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
Feuille, P., Delaney, J. T. & Hendricks, W. (1985). The impact of interest arbitration on police contracts. Industrial Relations, 24: 161-181.
19.
Folger, R. & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Pp. 141-183 in K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
Freeman, R. B. & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do?New York: Basic Books.
21.
Gerhart, P. F. (1976). Determinants of bargaining outcomes in local government labor negotiations. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 29: 331-351.
22.
Gordon, M. E. & Miller, S. J. (1984). Grievances: A review of research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 37: 117-146.
23.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Pp. 111-157 in B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.
Greenberg, J. & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. Pp. 235-256 in P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Ichniowski, C. & Lewin, D. (1988). Characteristics of grievance procedures: Evidence from nonunion, union, and double-breasted businesses. Pp. 415-424 in B. B. Dennis (Ed.), Proceedings of the fortieth annual meeting. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
26.
Kilgour, J. G. (1978). Responding to the union campaign. Personnel Journal, 57: 238-242, 269.
27.
Kochan, T. A. & Block, R. N. (1977). An interindustry analysis of bargaining outcomes: Preliminary evidence from two-digit industries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91: 431-452.
28.
Kochan, T. A. & Wheeler, H. N. (1975). Municipal collective bargaining: A model and analysis of bargaining outcomes. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 29: 46-66.
29.
Lawler, J. J. (1990). Unionization and deunionization. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
30.
Lewin, D. (1987). Dispute resolution in the nonunion firm: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31: 465-502.
31.
Lewin, D. (1990). Grievance procedures in nonunion workplaces: An empirical analysis of usage, dynamics, and outcomes. Chicago-Kenf Law Review, 66: 823-844.
32.
Lewin, D. & Peterson, R. B. (1988). Themodern grievance procedure in the United States. New York: Quorum Books.
33.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
34.
Morales, G. & Humphrey, K. (1992). The enforceability of agreements to arbitrate employment disputes. Labor Law Journal, 43: 663-670.
35.
McCabe, D. M. (1988). Corporate nonunion complaint procedures and systems. New York: Praeger.
36.
Mesch, D. J. & Dalton, D. R. (1992). Unexpected consequences of improving workplace justice: A six-year time series assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 1099-1114.
37.
Oldham, G. R. & Hackman, J. R. (1981). Relationships between organizational structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 66-83.
38.
Peterson, R. B. & Lewin, D. (1990). The nonunion grievance procedure: A viable system of due process?Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3: 1-18.
39.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
40.
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R. & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13: 65-105.
41.
Saunders, D. M. & Leek, J. (1989). Formal upward communication procedures: Organizational and employee perspectives. Unpublished manuscript, McGill University, Montreal.
42.
Scott, W. G. (1965). The management of conJ7icr: Appeal systems in organizations. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
43.
Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. & Minton, J. (1992). Organizational justice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
44.
Slichter, S. H., Healy, J. J. & Livernash, E. R. (1960). The impact of collective bargaining on management. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution,
45.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, (1992). Employment and Earnings, 39(January): 2-29.
46.
U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission. (1971). 5rhannualreport. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47.
U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission (1990). Combined annual report fiscal years 1986, 1987, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
