The Theory/Applications Balance in Management Pedagogy: Where Do We Stand?

Abstract

Business schools are expected to be "professional" in the sense that their mission is primarily to prepare people to practice their skills in the business world. Various critics, however, claim that management professors overemphasize theory and research and neglect the practice and applications students need to transfer classroom theory to the world of practice. This study compared an earlier sample with a more recent sample of Academy of Management members concerning the relative emphasis they believed should be placed on theory and applications in management pedagogy and the techniques they used to bring applications into the classroom. Current respondents believed that more emphasis should be placed on applications than the earlier respondents. An unexpected finding, however, was that the more recent respondents reported a lower mean usage of pedagogical techniques that are appropriate for developing students' ability to apply course concepts than the previous group. Possible reasons for these incongruent findings are discussed as well as the implications for management pedagogy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albanese, R. (1989). Competency-based management education. Three operative and normative issues. The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 14(1):16-28.

Allen, M. & Yen, W. ( 1979). Introduction to measurement theory. New York: Brooks-Cole Publishers.

American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business. (1991, April 23). Final report, the AACSB accreditation project. Unpublished document, AACSB.

Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisitioning cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89:369-406.

_. ( 1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Baldwin, T.T. & Ford, J.K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41: 63-105.

Behrman, J.N. & Levin, R.I. (1984). Are the business-schools doing their job? Harvard Business Review, 62(January/ February): 140-147.

Bickerstaffe, G. (1981). Crisis of confidence in the business-schools. International Management, 36(8):19-23.

Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive and affective domains. New York: David McKay Co.

10.

Buckley, M.R. , Wren, D.A. , & Michaelsen, L.K. (1992). The role of managerial experience in the management education process: Status, problems, and prospects . Journal of Management Education, 16(3): 303-313.

11.

Burke, M.J. & Day, R.R. (1986). A cumulative study of the effectiveness of managerial training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71:232-245.

12.

Gagné, R.M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

13.

_. ( 1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction , 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

14.

Gagné, R.M. & Briggs, L.R. (1979). Principles of instructional design, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

15.

Graduate Management Admissions Council. (1990 ). Leadership for a changing world: The future role of management education. Los Angeles, CA: Report of the Commission on Admission to Graduate Management Education, Graduate Management Admissions Council.

16.

Heinze, D. (1980). Fundamentals of managerial statistics. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.

17.

Keys, B. & Wolfe J. (1988). Management education and development: Current issues and emerging trends. Journal of Management, 14: 205-229.

18.

Leavitt, H.J. (1989). Educating our MBAs: On teaching what we haven't taught. California Management Review, 31(3): 38-50.

19.

Mandt, E.J. (1982). The failure of business education—and what to do about it. Management Review, 71(8): 47-52.

20.

Miles, R.E. (1985). The future of business education. California Management Review, 27(3): 63-73.

21.

Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.

22.

Muller, H.J. , Porter, J.L. , & Rehder, R.R. (1988). Have the business schools let down U.S. corporations? Management Review, 77(10): 24-31.

23.

Oviatt, B.M. & Miller, W.D. (1989). Irrelevance intransigence, and business professors . Academy of Management Executive, 3: 304-312.

24.

Payne, S.L. & Brannen, D.E. (1990). Doctoral programs in management and business administration: Investigation of criticisms and reforms. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 14(3): 1-13.

25.

Porter, L. & McKibbin, L.E. (1988). Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century? New York: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Quinn, R.E. , Faerman, S.R. , Thompson, M.P. , & McGrath, R.M. (1990). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework . New York: Wiley.

27.

Results of the membership survey. 1988. Academy of Management Newsletter, 18(January): 3,7.

28.

Serey, T.T. & Verderber, K.S. (1991). Beyond the wall: Resolving issues of educational philosophy and pedagogy in the teaching of management competencies. Pp. 3-19 in J. D. Bigelow (Ed.), Managerial skills: Explorations in practical knowledge. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

29.

Waddock, S.A. (1991). Educating tomorrow's managers. Journal of Management Education, 15(1): 69-95.

30.

Waters, J.A. (1980). Managerial skill development. Academy of Management Review, 5: 449-453.

31.

Wexley, K.N. & Baldwin, T.T. (1986). Management development. Journal of Management, 12: 237-294.

32.

Whetten, D.A. & Cameron, K.S. (1991). Developing management skills, 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman .

33.

Wren, D.A. , Atherton, R.M. , & Michaelsen, L.K. (1980). Theory and applications in management pedagogy: An empirical study. Journal of Management , 6: 21-31.