Meta-analyses were conducted to examine the antecedents of personal goal level, and the antecedents and consequences of goal commitment based on 78 goal-setting studies. Meta-analyses of the antecedents of personal goal level indicated that prior performance and ability were significantly related to personal goals whereas knowledge of results had a marginally significant relationship with personal goal level. The relationships of three antecedent variables with goal commitment were found to be statistically significant (i.e., self-efficacy, expectancy of goal attainment, and task difficulty), whereas task complexity had a marginally significant relationship with goal commitment. The results of the meta-analyses on the consequences of goal commitment showed goal commitment to significantly affect goal achievement. A model was developed that integrated the results of the meta-analyses with conceptually derived variables and relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Campbell, D. J.1982. Determinants of choice of goal difficulty level: A review of situational and personality influences. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55: 79-95.
2.
Cook, R. D.1977. Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics, 19: 15-18.
3.
Earley, P. C.1986. Supervisors and shop stewards as sources of contextual information in goal setting: A comparison of the United States with England. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 111-117.
4.
Evans, M. G.1986. Organizational behavior: The central role of motivation. Journal of Management, 12: 203-222.
5.
Glass, G. V., McGraw, G., & Smith, M. L.1981. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Klein, H. J.1987. Goal commitment and goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 212-220.
7.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. 1987. Error in the meta-analysis of correlations: The mean. Unpublished manuscript.
8.
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F L., & Jackson, G. B.1982. Metaanalysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S.1985. A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37: 16-78.
10.
Latham, G. P., & Marshall, M. A.1982. The effects of self-set, participatively set and assigned goals on the performance of government employees. Personnel Psychology, 35: 399-404.
11.
Latham, G. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Dossett, D. L.1978. Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 163-171.
12.
Latham, G. P., Steele, T. P., & Saari, L. M.1982. The effects of participation and goal difficulty on performance. Personnel Psychology, 35: 677-686.
13.
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P.1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M.1988. The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13: 23-39.
15.
Lord, R. G., & Keman, M. C.1983. Scripts as determinants of purposeful behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 12: 265-277.
16.
Matsui, T., Okada, A., & Mizuguchi, R.1981. Expectancy theory prediction of the goal theory postulated, "The harder the goals, the higher the performance."Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 377-379.
17.
Mento, A. J., Cartledge, N. D., & Locke, E. A.1980. Maryland vs. Michigan vs. Minnesota: Another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficulty to task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25: 419-440.
18.
Mento, A. J., Steel, R. P., & Karren, R. J.1987. A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 39: 52-83.
19.
Riedel, J.A., Nebeker, D. M., & Cooper, B. L.1988. The influence of monetary incentives on goal choice, goal commitment, and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42: 155-180.
20.
Schnake, M. E., Bushardt, S. C., & Spottswood, C.1984. Internal work motivation and intrinsic job satisfaction: The effects of goal clarity, goal difficulty, participation in goal setting, and choice of task difficulty. Group and Organization Studies, 9: 201-219.
21.
Stevens, J. P.1984. Outliers and influential data points in regression analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 334-344.
22.
Tubbs, M. E.1986. Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 474-483.
23.
Tukey, J. W.1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Vance, R. J., & Colella, A.1990. Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 68-76.
25.
Wagner, J. A., & Gooding, R. Z.1987. Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 524-541.
26.
Wofford, J. C.1982. Experimental tests of the goal-energy-effort requirement theory of work motivation. Psychological Reports, 50: 1259-1273.
27.
Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A.1987. Task complexity as a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 407-415.
